Potential Systemic Safeguarding failures in NSPCC / Childline illustrated by appointment & ending of relationship with Munroe Bergdorf Thread 2

[R0wantrees]

link to previous thread: www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3605120-Munroe-Childline-s-first-LGBT-campaigner

NSPCC statement by CEO Peter Wanless
www.nspcc.org.uk/what-we-do/news-opinion/munroe-bergdorf

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3609218-Hi-from-Safe-Schools-Alliance-UK

Datun is sounds like bliss! Please leave my name at the door. I have sloe and !

Is there ? I think I need lots.

sorry cross posted summer

Wellllll.....

.... After James Kirkups article, this was published in the last 15mins by the BBC

www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-48643467
Munroe Bergdorf: NSPCC explains transgender activist decision

It's the article they should have done from the very beginning...

... What day is it again? When did this story break?

youkiddingme great minds! Here, some just for you.

We could all do with some good female company and a stiff drink after all that's come to light after the last couple of days. Particularly as this could well be just the top of the iceberg.

Well well BBC, forced to do a proper article huh. Only, they left out an important bit I thought. Here they say:

it had tried to make direct contact with Ms Bergdorf before announcing it was removing her from the campaign, but was unable to do so and the announcement "should have been delayed"

But forgot to add that her publicist did know and NSPCC made amendments to the first statement at their request.

But forgot to add that her publicist did know and NSPCC made amendments to the first statement at their request.

So... this comment at the end of the BBC article?

"her spokesperson accused the charity of "bowing down to pressure from a transphobic lobby running a hate campaign"."

NSPCC & BBC should be explaining why its a Safeguarding no no for adults (however prominant, admired or regarded as attractive) to solicit private messages from children regardless of their intentions.

This should be a key aspect of reporting.
NSPCC have the opportunity
BBC have a responsibility

If Munroe & Munroe's PR team are determined to keep claiming transphobia then clearly they still dont understand /care about Safeguarding children online, particularly children who are part of the LGBT+ community.

Exactly.

No one appears to be talking about bergdorf encouraging children to contact them in private messages, in direct violation of the NSPCC policy for adults not to contact children via private messages.

Not to mention Bergdorf approving of a 10-year-old twerking on an adult only club.

I wonder why that is?

It’s also strange the article describes Munroe as a leading figure in the LGBT+ community. Why would that community want someone who has lost 3 prominent roles now, for their behaviour that is seen as homophobic in some cases, racist, and now a child safeguarding issue. This is not the person who should be ‘prominent’.

And here we have the Hayward Art Gallery and Gendered Intelligence promoting porn for primary children. Transgender Trend's latest and very chilling blog:

www.transgendertrend.com/gendered-intelligence-training-teachers-kiss-my-genders/

When is society going to wake up to what is being done to children?

Bluddyell just come from reading that account on the TGT blog - WTF are the Hayward thinking about ?

Well I just read that about th3 Hayward gallery. And gendered intelligence

So the guy leading the talk is having 1 to 1 talks with a 9 year old

And as to the fact there is no age restrictions on children seeing men with spikes in their arses and rape scenes

FFS FFS FFS

It’s also strange the article describes Munroe as a leading figure in the LGBT+ community. Why would that community want someone who has lost 3 prominent roles now, for their behaviour that is seen as homophobic in some cases, racist, and now a child safeguarding issue.

Munroe Bergdorf is a prominant trans person.

Trans rights activists have been pushing the 'LGBT+ community' to be good allies. Its bizarre that Bergdorf gets a free pass by those who are gay, lesbian, parents, adults concerned for Safeguarding & those who deplor racism.

Is this very successful extreme forced teaming?

The CEO of Gendered Intelligence is Jay Stewart, a female who identifies as a male.

Wasn't Jay Stewart the one involved at the science museum's do you have a pink brain or a blue brain exhibition?

As I remember they came on here and couldn't competently answer a single bloody question.

Interestingly, CEO Stonewall Ruth Hunt; CEO GI Jay Stewart; CEO Scottish Trans Alliance, James Morton [another female who identifies as male]

Have these females been groomed by the males with whom they work?

Fucking hell that 'art' training session.

I knew there was a reason I got out of the art world. Reminds me of the art show in flea bag. Contrived.

A deleted post referred to the fact that as boundaries are so blurred in queer theory, as that exhibition shows, safeguarding issues can become very easily linked to 'trans.' Which isn't fair on the trans community nor healthy for children to learn about.

Dressing it up as 'Art, innit' doesn't make it any better or healthier boundary wise.

That Haywood Gallery exhibition is just revolting

So the guy leading the talk is having 1 to 1 talks with a 9 year old

Just, wtaf?

Went to have a look at the Hayward website.
If you're 13-17 you can participate in a workshop based on this exhibition.
www.southbankcentre.co.uk/whats-on/138048-manifesto-making-workshop-2019

There is a content warning on the page that the exhibition contains nudity and some sexual content.

Doesn't mention the rape scenes, erect penis or spikes.

That Haywood Gallery exhibition is just revolting

That exhibition is perversion!

And group tickets for primary schools are free! (see further down this page)

www.southbankcentre.co.uk/whats-on/exhibitions/hayward-gallery-art/kiss-my-genders#484541

Hope any primary teachers do a preliminary visit first!