Police interviewing Caroline Farrow under caution and threatening to arrest her for "misgendering"

[Pimmsnlemonade]

twitter.com/CF_Farrow/status/1107787009614065664

And, as she says in the thread:

"Meanwhile a group of people have terrified and harassed my family. Doxed my children, made violent and sexual threats, signed me up to porn accounts, did the same to my husband, threatened to visit here. And tumbleweed..."

Susie Greensays the complaint is because she was called a child abuser.

Scared to comment!

I agree with every word of Carros Tweets.

V Derbyshire prog. disgracceful, showing the tweets that are under investigation, but Caroline Farrow is saying she didn't know yet which tweets she is to be interviewed about!
How can this be right?

So going after Caro because she's a journalist...is that a wise strategy?

Susie, your actions should be scrutinized. And criticized.

Does CF know or not know, at this point, which tweets she will be interviewed about? Can someone please clarify?

Talk about drawing even more attention to your dodgy parenting decisions. Must have spent too long in an echo chamber surrounded by rainbows and unicorns if you think most of the public would support underage reassignment surgery.

Says she reported because she felt morally compelled. Then withdrew the complaint to stop giving Caroline a platform.

If india Willoughby is a woman, then why is she always interviewed about transwomen?

PitPony she didn't know.

So much projection! Making herself a victim, Susie being denied a platformed if she pursued a complain

So Green is complaining that she doesn't have a platform. While on the BBC.

Those tweets were in respect of Susie and her parenting decisions, not an attack on Susie's child, as she keeps citing.

Thanks CaptainMarvel. That was my understanding last time I read this thread and CF's tweets about it last night but thought perhaps she'd been told specifically which tweets earlier this morning and I'd missed it.
So wrong of the BBC!

VD should've been asking SG exactly what was untrue or hateful in those tweets. Terrible interview.

Says she reported because she felt morally compelled. Then withdrew the complaint to stop giving Caroline a platform.

I’m calling BS on that. It was withdrawn after the case on Miranda was dismissed, and they knew damn well this would be too.

I’ve had a strike for saying what I think of castrating children, so I can’t say it, even here. But I’m glad Caro said it. If it is illegal in this country, surely Caro’s views are supported by the laws in this country?

The woman is a menace. Investigation still ongoing according to the police statement. Caroline did not know what evidence was being brought against her. Green withdraws the complaint and then uses national platform to slander Caroline and prejudice ongoing investigation.

I hope Caroline takes this further. Green needs to be sued and prosecuted. Terrible, terrible woman.

Those tweets were factual though. If the facts offend Susie Green then she has a problem and it's not with the tweeter.

Does CF know or not know, at this point, which tweets she will be interviewed about? Can someone please clarify?

This is important. Clarity matters.

OW we have an alleged complainant on BBC both sharing the tweets and saying she has withdrawn the charge.

Many people offering support against alleged investigation into 'misgendering tweets' which may be about something else.

"I don't think hate should stand"

The tweets were harsh but do they constitute hate, do they show Caroline "going after" the Green's?

OW we have an alleged complainant on BBC both sharing the tweets and saying she has withdrawn the charge.

How is this even allowed?

If it was about being called a child abuser, why pick on Caroline? Many, many people have called Susie Green out on that front.
That spectator article highlighted some of those occasions.

The only good part of that segment was Victoria Derbyshire reading out those tweets. How did the BBC get hold of them, if Caroline couldn't? Did Susie Green share them?

Did Susie basically called the police because she was upset about Caroline criticising her actions in language she thought was too harsh? The word castration seems a trigger point, even though it's factually accurate.

Now she's withdrawn the complaint, claiming it's so she can speak about it openly in the media and challenge Caroline.
We can see what's going on. Susie is worried, because calling the police on a journalist for tweets makes her look unhinged and wasting scarce resources.

How old is Susies ‘child’ now? Because I’m sure they must be an adult by now and able to decide for themselves whether they want to spend their lives pursuing journalists into court and patrolling social media for thinkingwrongly.
SG seems extremely controlling to me.