Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Linford Christie's reaction

319 replies

Mankyfoot · 11/03/2019 08:59

C'mon Linford Grin

Linford Christie's reaction
OP posts:
JessicaWakefieldSVH · 12/03/2019 14:23

I think most people both male and female would object to that. The pundits on athletics programmes would find it almost impossible to comment without discomfort.

So? We’re talking about whether or not the paying public would stop, which would create a financial reason for stopping males participating in women’s sport. I’m questioning that.

Aeroflotgirl · 12/03/2019 14:23

I think that it would be very difficult to take woman's sport seriously, when biological men are trouncing women at their own sport.

DoctoressPlague · 12/03/2019 14:23

It's different because the transgression isn't staring you in the face in the same way as the unfairness of males beating women in women's sports.

JessicaWakefieldSVH · 12/03/2019 14:25

You're implying that most top flight sportmen are evil abusers. Which is a bit unfair.

Are you flipping kidding me? Are you really NAMALT right now? Jesus.

Paddy Jackson is currently playing professional rugby.
Danny Care and Mike Brown continued to play for their country despite a 2008 rape claim that is not dissimilar to the Belfast rape trial. I have a thread on this. My god.

JessicaWakefieldSVH · 12/03/2019 14:28

I certainly wouldn't pay to watch a very one sided race, or a low level race unless I had a personal interest in one of the competitors.

I wouldn’t either. I also stopped watching rugby and football because watching and applauding men who get away with abusing women made me feel physically ill.

A man who chased and beat his gf on the street a few months ago, just laced up and played in the best rugby club in the world and was awarded man of the match, with his coach who’s poss the next All Blacks coach, calling him a great human. The player avoided even a conviction because the judge didn’t want to take away his right to provide for his family. He’s 22 with no kids.

JessicaWakefieldSVH · 12/03/2019 14:29

It's different because the transgression isn't staring you in the face in the same way as the unfairness of males beating women in women's sports.

I see your point. That’s answering the question I originally asked, somewhat. I just wonder if people will stop watching in large enough numbers to make a difference.

I mean, who on earth can watch Paddy Jackson and applaud after reading what he did??

LangCleg · 12/03/2019 14:30

I certainly wouldn't pay to watch a very one sided race, or a low level race unless I had a personal interest in one of the competitors.

There will be less funding because ticket sales will decrease and advertisers will look for higher viewing figures.

So all the work women have done fighting for more visibility will be lost.

JessicaWakefieldSVH · 12/03/2019 14:36

LangCleg

Gosh, that’s a very good point I hadn’t considered. This is terrible for women in every direction. It’s enraging!

JessicaWakefieldSVH · 12/03/2019 14:37

Does anyone know what the rules are in rowing? Can you self ID as a woman in rowing too? Imagine the boat race, with the women’s event only recently actually being televised, with males in the women’s boats...

derxa · 12/03/2019 14:39

Paddy Jackson is currently playing professional rugby. Danny Care and Mike Brown continued to play for their country despite a 2008 rape claim that is not dissimilar to the Belfast rape trial. I have a thread on this. My god. I'm sure they're hideous men but they're men playing in a men's sporting category. It's not unfair in a sporting sense as a transwoman playing women's rugby would be. It may be morally repugnant but it's not unfair.

EcclesThePeacock · 12/03/2019 14:45

Suggestive though that quite a lot of sports spectators don't give a shit about women's rights.

JessicaWakefieldSVH · 12/03/2019 14:48

derxa

You’re changing the issue there. We aren’t talking about what’s fair or not. And I’d disagree it’s fair btw, revictimising women by allowing pro sportsmen to retain every benefit they had before an assault is unfair. It’s unfair to play them instead them instead of other men who are both players and not hurting women. But that’s not the question.

I asked if the unfairness of this would be enough for people to stop watching and paying for sport, in large enough numbers to make a financial impact. Sports fans tolerate quite a lot just to keep being entertained. How many times have you heard someone say that men’s rugby, as an example, is more entertaining and better quality than women’s? It’s not true, but it’s what a lot of fans men and woman, think. Maybe they’d like to see transwomen dominate the sport too?

DoctoressPlague · 12/03/2019 14:57

But there's no unfairness in the sense that the rapist doesn't have an advantage in competition, to put it crudely. Whereas when males compete against women in women's sports, spectators can see the unfairness play out before their eyes.

derxa · 12/03/2019 15:02

Yes Doctoress That's what I meant.

CaptainMarvelBunting · 12/03/2019 15:04

I'm not sure people do generally watch sport because of an over riding appreciation for fair competition. They watch it to be entertained.

If a referee decision goes against their team, people get very exercised about fairness. If it goes for their team, even if it's proved to be in error, you don't see people clamouring for a replay.

Males in women's sports will get traction if it is waved through by governing bodies, because any dominant force in a sporting event will gain followers and there is big money involved in the top end.

Relying on the goodwill of people for whom this is a lucrative business, is about as fucking naive as I can imagine, tbh.

Rufusthebewilderedreindeer · 12/03/2019 15:10

I agree completely with captain

andyoldlabour · 12/03/2019 15:11

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

JessicaWakefieldSVH · 12/03/2019 15:14

I'm not sure people do generally watch sport because of an over riding appreciation for fair competition. They watch it to be entertained.

Yes, that’s my argument, much better worded than I could :)

DoctoressPlague · 12/03/2019 15:14

True, Captain. If anything, it'll be the farce that results from the unfairness that will turn off spectators, not the immorality of it. (Although some might be attracted by the farce.)

JessicaWakefieldSVH · 12/03/2019 15:16

andyoldlabour oh, thanks, I suspected as much

Rufusthebewilderedreindeer · 12/03/2019 15:17

Oooh sorry jessica

Quite obviously i agree with you too

JessicaWakefieldSVH · 12/03/2019 15:21

That’s ok, I didn’t word it well!

Another unfair thing that happens in rugby, sorry that’s the sport I’m into, is that the rich countries can buy players from poorer countries and improve their teams chances. You can literally see the unfairness when huge Māori or Pacific Islanders stand alongside English or Irish players, playing against their actual home teams who have been significantly weakened as rich nations buy the top players. People do say it’s unfair... but nobody is actually stopping watching. I mean, I am for that reason too but not many are. Fans will say, yeah that’s not fair, but their desire to be entertained and for their team to win, surpasses any sense of fairness.

Doyoumind · 12/03/2019 16:31

RM needs to brush up on her geography.

Linford Christie's reaction
Doyoumind · 12/03/2019 16:32

Trying to post a close up but it won't let me.

EcclesThePeacock · 12/03/2019 16:33

And on logic.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is closed and is no longer accepting replies. Click here to start a new thread.

Swipe left for the next trending thread