Mary I give in. You seem quite determined to misunderstand me.
That's fine, but it is odd that you do as I agree with you, for the most part. We may disagree over the science, which I believe needs to catch up before any decisions are made about any penalties, categorisations or condemnations are made.
It is, in my opinion, that transwomen do not compete against women, for all the reasons you outline. In my mind that is stating the blindingly obvious!
But it is also correct, in my opinion, that more science is needed to understand the wide variation in intersex individuals before making any decisions about their comeptitive niche. It is obvious that there is an advantage from testosterone, I have stated that more than once (I taught sport science for long enough to know what it is ands how it affects performance).
BUT the advantage is not the same for all, the effects vary. It is incumbent upon the AIIF etc to know fully what it is they are banning, sidelining, categorising, before they go ahead with any irreversible changes. They should be seen to be doing more, better than the current statement - as I also said way back upthread!
If all of that means that some or all intersex athletes are also banned from competing against female athletes, so be it! BUT do the science first. Make it a fully informed decision, Make sure that any possible loopholes are closed, prevent any unecessary prolonging of the situation.
THAT is, as far as I can see, is the upshot of Dutee Chand's court decision.