The ONLY reason women have specific legal rights is because we have female bodies.
It’s why we have maternity rights, it’s why we have single SEX spaces and it’s why we are entitled to be medically examined/intimately searched and politically represented by other people with female bodies.
If ‘woman’ is really a psychological state, rather than a biological state, why would these laws and protections for female bodies exist?
And for what reason would a person seek legal rights that they cannot legitimately make use of (due to not having a female body)?
I cannot come up with anything nice and only one or two neutral-ish things. Yet the list of not-nice things is ever growing.
Luckily the TRA have given us a more or less serviceable rebrand - if we just drop the ‘assigned’ bit, we can be FAB 😍
Prisons and refuges, changing rooms, sports and toilets for FAB people will encompass transmasc and female-bodied non-binary people so no one will be excluded on the basis of gender identity (or race or disability or age or nationality or fertility status and people with disorders of sexual development will sometimes need some medical tests but drs are really good at discerning FAB disorders from MAB disorders nowadays, so in a country with socialised health care, they aren’t a problematic gotcha for law makers).
Sorted. We can use this classification for crime statistics and medical research and monitoring things like wages and mortality rates.
Of course, FAB is a bit unwieldy to use all the time, so those of us without a trans identity will no doubt continue to use the traditional terms for FAB people when referring to ourselves - ‘women’ and ‘girls’.
Thanks for the inspiration, Liz.