University of Reading needs to give its head a wibble at that outrageous victim-blaming, sceptical statement.
These incidents aren't "alleged incidents". To say that the incidents are 'alleged' implies that the victim is not believed.
The term 'allegation' is used when there is a perpetrator who has to answer the allegations, and the police/prosecutor/media has to be mindful of the 'innocent until proven guilty' principle. You do not use the word before you've got a perpetrator, and to throw doubt on the victim's account.
The scepticism and victim-blaming is compounded by the University saying that it wants 'more details' and that it condemns all forms of harassment. It does not accept Rosa Freedman words, then?
We are used to hearing instititutions blaming "both sides" (sic) - as though there had ever been a case of a feminist harassing a trans activist, or intimidating TRAs. To see the University of Reading calling Rosa's testimony an allegation, and implying that there were two sides to the story, is outrageous.
I wouldn't want my daughter to be a student there, if that's how they handle reports harassment and threatening behaviour.