I don't think life, or politics, are quite so simple and clear-cut. Many socialists - especially of older generations - very much believe in, and practice, fiscal restraint; having learned their values in the school of hard knocks. If you haven't got, you cannot spend. Having had very little in life teaches you the true value of 'having', I would argue. It can also teach you compassion and empathy.
At the same time, some of those who have suffered most can often be the harshest of critics. No excuses for lazy or irresponsible behaviour. And yet this does not necessarily make you right wing - because you still are able to retain the ability to recognise the larger perspective, and the system under which you operate and live.
We are not all born equal - in terms of opportunity and privilege. And most often no matter how conscientious one is - one often cannot rise to the status and position of those born in more materially fortunate circumstances. In this way - socialism is a materialist analysis of society; and a structural one.
Regarding the issue of human rights to life: I believe, through experience, that no matter how painful or difficult, a woman must have, and does have, the right to determine whether or not she chooses to become a mother; whether or not to continue with a pregnancy.
In this women must accept total responsibility for the choices and decisions they make. As we all must. If there is no external authority - imposing moral judgements -then we must all become truly responsible.
For me - a lot of right wing views and positions are incredibly judgmental and moralistic - and in a way which strips the individual of their own moral responsibility and authority.