"Acceptance without exception" - isn't that Stonewall's motto?
There have been lone LBG voices expressing their disquiet about embracing the 'Kink' Community (furry, fetish, paraphilia, voyeurism, sado-machoism and other -isms). Both Jess Bradley and Aimee Challoner were both very keen to ensure that they were lining up this next 'most oppressed and marginalised' group of heterosexual men once the GRA reforms were in the bag. I wonder why?
I see that the LBGT Foundation (Manchester based health and support service) advertises its regular Kink Nights where men people can explore their private world in a safe space. The aim is to make their sexual experiences more enjoyable but the obligatory lube and safe sex messages are included.
I wonder whether the hard-pressed local authorities and NHS trusts in Greater Manchester ever look at some of the projects that they fund and ask WTF? Just because it's got LBGT in the title doesn't make it progressive or an appropriate way to spend taxes, surely?
Is this another example of infiltration?
LBG's flirtation with the Paedophile Information Exchange in the 1970s is being resurrected in the media. It's inclusion of people with trans-related paraphilia, furries and fetishes will come back to bite them on the arse, unless they act soon. Is there nothing that they won't accept without exception?