It's also why a lot of professionals in the field are careful to distinguish between the much wider group of child sexual abusers and the smaller subset of genuine paedophiles - because most child sexual abuse isn't carried out by paedophiles in the strict sense of the word, but by men who simply get off on sexual abuse, and pick whatever pool of victims is most readily available and most vulnerable. The key thing is, as you put it, "believing they are entitled to take sexually what they like" - in fact not merely believing it, the coercion, the violation of consent, is the kick for this sort of man.
This!!
Yes you are correct re terminology - I was imprecise - I tend to use pedophile as a descriptor for anyone who sexually victimises a child, whether by watching child pornography or by rape - but that's not accepted generally.
I do think the is what these entitled men want us and the public to be deflected away from though - in fact not merely believing it, the coercion, the violation of consent, is the kick for this sort of man.
They break other's boundaries, sexually as well as in other ways (financially, politically, psychologically etc) - in other words these men are duplicitous intentionally. They get off on it as you say - not only "forbidden sex" eg child rape, but also the violation and distress of target, the humiliation of anyone who tries to prevent them and the high they get from offending in plain sight and getting away with it.