Turph, I wonder if following the President's Club expose they decided to bring in some woke diversity consultants to ensure Ocado retained a caring/sharing image. Unfortunately these consultants forgot to point out that the law talks about sex rather than gender, and that women were not that keen on having their statutory protections shared with a whole Noah's Arc of diversity: transgender, transsexual, gender-queer (GQ), gender-fluid, non-binary, gender-variant, crossdresser, genderless, agender, nongender, third gender, two-spirit, bi-gender, trans man, trans woman,trans masculine, trans feminine and neutrois.
Presumably like Credit Suisse they thought that, say accepting that a man might turn up in a dress a couple of days a week to demonstrate his feminine side was mildly amusing, and showed how tolerant they were.
So women: adult humale females, no longer exist. Indeed the very definition is hate speech and something that super-woke Ocado went out of their way to confirm they would not tolerate.
Well sorry. Women consider themselves women, and are not convinced by the man in a dress or some of his gender diversity chums. They want current single sex spaces to remain protected. They dont like the idea of boys/Presidents club misogynists, along with their nasty Doctor friend, using their power to take these spaces from them.
Christmas is coming, turkey orders are being prepared. If Ocado want our custom the least they should do is admit they got it wrong. Stonewalls own figures suggest that significantly fewer than 20% of the population believe in gender self ID. They can then get together with their billboard pals and give Posie a new poster.
Adult human female from adult human male.
And perhaps throw a bit of their advertising budget MN's way.