Jess Bradley, first transgender student officer, suspended after flashing photos

[CaitlynsCat]

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6003331/Britains-official-transgender-student-officer-suspended.html

"Shocking images on the site show an individual flashing while sitting in a train carriage, in a public park and at a bus stop.

Another photograph shows male genitals being exposed in an office close to a curved wooden desk that is strikingly similar to a picture of a work desk that Ms Bradley posted on her Facebook page. "

The photo have been archived on archive.is, you can search there under the domain exhbitionizm.tumblr.com and include lots of flashing shots.

Bradley has commented:

" I appreciate at this time there is a lot of speculation about my conduct and I am able to tell you that I am confident that none of my behaviour has been unlawful, and that I have not engaged in sexual activity with anyone, or in the view of anyone, without their consent. "

Once they've committed or attempted a crime obviously, didn't think I had to spell the basics out. Or do you think we should be arresting people for precrime??

minority report was a dystopian horror not an instruction manual!

The TRA argument has been that any individual exposing a penis in a woman’s changing area or private space would be doing so only incidentally. That we should accept that exposure the same way we accept brief glimpses of vulvas in female changing areas.

Many woman have protested this concept because it doesn’t feel incidental to us. It feels like someone is intentionally trying to bring us into their game of exposed genitalia. Now we find that one of the advocates for allowing that “incidental” exposure is indeed an exhibitionist trying to force us to be unwilling participants.

Perhaps society should be giving more weight to women’s learned instincts.

I would remind everyone that trying to deny the rights of trans people for the actions of an individual meets the definition of collective punishment, a war crime under the Geneva convention.

What rights do transgenders want that they do not already have, besides unfettered access to women and girls in various states of undress?
No one has that right.

It is particularly obvious when they are masturbating while making eye contact.

"unfettered access to women and girls in various states of undress? No one has that right."

Unless communal changing areas stopped existing, it seems that women and girls have that right...

You could look it up, that word, unfettered.

I would remind everyone that trying to deny the rights of trans people for the actions of an individual meets the definition of collective punishment, a war crime under the Geneva convention
Impressive. So any risk analysis or identification of trends could constitute a war crime. Someone tell the insurance industry quick! An 18 year old boy in a modified high powered car is not an additional financial risk, because charging him £3500 for his insurance is denying his right to vehicular expression based on the acts of other, unrelated individuals.

Some funny person has made this bloody hilarious meme (sorry if it's already posted, have only just skimmed the thread) -

STOP NOW we have committed war-crimes.

DESIST you big fannies.

The Geneva-fucking-Covemtion compels you.

Thanks for that genderskeptic, I would hate to transgress international law.

Phew.

The Geneva Convention

Materialist of course.

We are at war.

At least they admit it now.

I do enjoy a bit of thick-man baiting.

Always have.

My mother told me to pluck the low-hanging fruit.

Bring it on genderskeptic.

I await your erudite response.

Interestingly there's been no response from Owen Jones to my Tweet. No ban either.

Dear old Dr Harrop has been going a bit wild though.

I wonder whether the "philogynistic" comic "Twisted Romance" that Bradley has an upcoming story in will still include his contribution.

I wonder what kind of 'twisted' this exhibitionist likes his romance stories to be. I wonder what we'll be expected to excuse from him for fear of being called sex-negative.

The Geneva Convention oh FFS
Someone sounds more than a little testerical.

The Geneva Convention

Oh my days, I've heard it all now.

genderskeptic, you're missing the point. Bradley is not some random transwoman. Bradley has the ear of government, provides training in the public and private sectors, and is a spokesperson for the movement, appearing in print & on TV regularly.

I know it would be very convenient to have a Stalinist purge and pretend this never happened, but it did. And it demonstrates with quite devastating simplicity why women are worried. So no, you don't get to sweep this under the carpet and pretend it doesn't matter, because it absolutely does matter.

I go away for one weekend and war breaks out lol

Anyway, now that you've broken the duck on supporting Bradley on this thread, genderskeptic, perhaps some others will feel confident weighing in. I am also awaiting my enlightement about Why Women Are Wrong About This

I've found someone trying to defend Jess. Good luck with your "nasty terf rumours, leave her alone!" tweets, Katie.

Crikey, 24 pages in waiting for a defender of the indefensible, and one arrives citing the Geneva Convention. I mean, we all knew this case would be a hard one for the genderists to defend, but even by their shark-jumping standards that's a whole special level of stupid.

Interesting turn of phrase "trying to make her feel shame"- as though they don't or shouldn't - quite contrary to what would be expected ........

Geneva Convention