Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Linda Bellos arrested **Title edited by MNHQ to make clear that she was in fact 'interviewed under caution'**

354 replies

Terfragette69 · 01/05/2018 16:03

So it would appear that Linda has been arrested and interviewed for saying she would protect herself if the tra's attacked.... What the actual fuck?? This is getting ridiculous we need to act!

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
Wanderabout · 01/05/2018 23:33

Just to be clear, that's being prepared to use self-defence against actual physical attack. Not punching someone because they disagree with you.

AngryAttackKittens · 01/05/2018 23:33

This is the second time that a small older woman specifically has been framed as a threat. If they keep doing that people might notice how absurd the idea that those women are a threat to large, healthy young male humans are is.

LaSqrrl · 01/05/2018 23:53

2nd rule of misogyny: Women saying no to men is a hate crime.

I would add, when women act in (or even declare their intention) to defend themselves from male violence, it is considered an offensive act.

Icantreachthepretzels · 02/05/2018 00:09

I'm going to ask if you've actually seen the pug video.

No of course I haven't seen it. The first I heard about it was the article you linked - where even the person defending him wasn't that sure. And nothing in that article made me feel any sympathy for the man or want to check his video out. I suspect Graham Linehan was completely on the money.

It's very obviously a joke. An offensive joke, but a joke nonetheless.
And the context of 'a joke' was not deemed good enough. The 'why' - not the 'what'.

The point is joke or not he said it. And that offended some people. So they complained about his actual words.
Linda Bellos did not say what the 'evidence' of her seemed to claim, it was some of her words taken away from others which changed the meaning of what she had said. This was deliberately done by someone else. In order for people to take offence at her words, they had to get rid of the rest of her speech. Which is completely different to taking offence to the actual words that pug guy spoke.

Wherever you stand on pug guy's right to free speech - the Linda Bellos case is not the same thing - and people cannot be held responsible when a third party edits their words. And no judge has ruled that they can.
However this is now a complete derail and I apologise to all other posters.

AnitaLovesVictor · 02/05/2018 01:11

I'm going to assume that this will play out the same way Posie Parker's interview under caution did. The CPS will not make charges.

N Yorks police are being over-zealous, and the TRAs are taking great pleasure in putting the frighteners on women - to shut them up.

If I'm wrong, I'll be outside that court supporting Linda. Peacefully of course. I won't be wearing a mask, or bring any scary looking dogs. My dog looks like a giant cuddly toy.

AngryAttackKittens · 02/05/2018 01:21

If could be I'd be there too. Good luck trying to spin a group of women standing around being supportive as being as scary as a bunch of young men in antifa gear and masks.

(Don't have a dog but if I was closer I'd bring the Bernese that lives up the road. If you were caught in an avalanche he could possibly be trained to bring you brandy? So scary.)

TotallyLibrarianPoo · 02/05/2018 02:20

@GeorgeFayne re: the men financing this movement.

I've been sharing that link as well, and was shocked the other day to discover that many of the highlighted links no longer work. I know they did originally when I first found it here on MN. Not sure who would be responsible and when/how they deleted the links.

IdentifiesAsMiddleAged · 02/05/2018 06:41

Who knew small middle-aged-or-older-women were such a threat?

IIIustriouslyIllogical · 02/05/2018 08:12

No of course I haven't seen it.

OK, fair enough. I could tell.

It's the thin edge of the wedge though & the ramifications are massive - especially when "hate speech" can be invoked for calling someone with male chromosomes & full working male genitals a Man.

You'd have to be either massively derailed by the "nazi" topic of the case or wilfully stupid to ignore that though!

I'll stop "derailing" now though..... Wink

Floisme · 02/05/2018 08:21

I am small and in late middle age. If I had a cat and grew herbs, I'd be starting to get worried.

BeyondParody · 02/05/2018 08:32

Talk about this peak transing people, a friend of mine who has been vocally self ID has reacted to my fb status about it...

Kyanite · 02/05/2018 08:39

I find it very concerning. There is also a Change.Org petition to have any deviation from the trans mantras to be regarded as abuse. Language about ourselves is being controlled.

Linda Bellos arrested **Title edited by MNHQ to make clear that she was in fact  'interviewed under caution'**
Wanderabout · 02/05/2018 08:54

There is also a Change.Org petition to have any deviation from the trans mantras to be regarded as abuse.

Seriously?

BeyondParody · 02/05/2018 09:01

'Female' was the appropriate language when talking about biology five minutes ago, now it's xx?

I'm transwoman and you are woman.
Transwoman? No, it's transwoman, you are ciswoman
Trans_woman? No, it's woman, you are female
Woman? No, it's female, you are xx
Female? No it's xx, you are...left with no way to define yourself as literally every word has been appropriated.

Rufustheconstantreindeer · 02/05/2018 09:01

icantreach

I think your posts have been very interesting

Rufustheconstantreindeer · 02/05/2018 09:04

kyanite

Christ all fucking mighty!!

I'm getting perturbed again...

You won't like me when I'm perturbed

Popchyk · 02/05/2018 09:15

All that time spent trawling through women's conversations and this is the worst example of alleged transphobia that they can find?

I suspect that they are getting quite desperate now. All the talk of literal genocide for months and the only example they have is Linda Bellos saying she'd defend herself if attacked.

Laughable really.

AngryAttackKittens · 02/05/2018 09:20

Rufus, are we about to see your less polite offline personality? Cause that sounds kind of fun.

Grin
AngryAttackKittens · 02/05/2018 09:21

But yeah, the sum total of months of digging for evidence of "TERFS" being dangerous monsters is one small older woman saying that if she was physically attacked she'd attempt to defend herself. What, she wouldn't just meekly say "I accept my punishment" and stand there waiting to be thumped? Shocking. Women are so unladylike these days!

Ellenripleysalienbaby · 02/05/2018 09:22

Fucking hell that screenshot Kyanite. Telling a woman she is not allowed to refer to herself as woman, that she 'should' be calling herself.... XX?

Seriously, what is happening here? I feel like such an old gimmer saying this, but the world is going mad!

AngryAttackKittens · 02/05/2018 09:24

"Hello, I am currently a set of letters because my officially issued number is still in the post. The last traces of my humanity will be stripped away soon so don't be alarmed."

Rufustheconstantreindeer · 02/05/2018 09:26

angry

Its not for me Grin

Things get broken, children get terrified, dh hides

Its not pretty

(I dont lose my temper often...but when i do its a doozy Grin)

Ellenripleysalienbaby · 02/05/2018 09:27

Yes, what would they expect Linda to say after another woman, with similar opinions to her own, has just been punched in the face at Speakers Corner?

'If one of those bastards comes anywhere near me, I will....... let them smack me right in the face. Like a woman should'.

??? Confused

Kyanite · 02/05/2018 09:30

Some transwomen are even saying that they are more woman than those born a woman, as they have gone through transitioning.

These pics are from change.org -

Linda Bellos arrested **Title edited by MNHQ to make clear that she was in fact  'interviewed under caution'**
Linda Bellos arrested **Title edited by MNHQ to make clear that she was in fact  'interviewed under caution'**
AngryAttackKittens · 02/05/2018 09:34

If the principle that not sharing someone's beliefs is a violation of their rights was made law can you imagine what religious extremists would do with it?