For example ; if I refuse to hire sally because she’s Jewish/Muslim/Christian then I am discriminating and quite rightly I should be pulled up on it. If I abuse sally in person due to her religion I’m committing an offence. If I punch sally to the ground while she’s praying at speakers corner I expect to be hauled before the law.
You cannot say that discussion of an ideology is transphobic. It is not. If feminists were bashing trans people in the streets then you’d have a point. But in fact, the violence is both one way and the other way. Where are the feminists punching transwomen? They don’t exist. But TRA activists are threatening and physically hurting feminists. For talking about how this ideology affects women and girls.
This "unless I punch anyone" definition ignores the more insidious impact of dehumanisation and scaremongering.
The post comparing trans campaigners to the Paedophile Information Exchange is still up, FFS. Buffalo Bill from Silence Of The Lambs is seen as a legitimate case study. You seem to be to going down the BNP route of saying "it's not islamophobia because it's rational and proportional". (It's perfectly legal to say that. I've seen it in election literature.)
The ad hominem dismissal of dissenting voices as sealions, trolls, goady fuckers, infiltrators, misogynists or TRAs suggests otherwise. The amount of selective blindness on here is awesome. I think your fears are excessive. That, if nothing else, renders you, literally, phobic, in my book.
I always wonder, don't the people who think that way have families? How do they manage at Christmas, weddings, etc? Do they try to no-platform Auntie Jean Who's Always Going On About Immigrants?
They don't deny she's xenophobic though.