perfectly
You seem to be fairly oblivious to the reasons why women are concerned.
It’s not an issue with science, specifically. Or being militant for the sake of it.
Lots of people are disadvantaged. Disabled people, LGBT. That why we have equality law. Sex discrimination is there for a reason.
To address the structural inequality in society.
And it is predicated on biology. There are only two sexes and one sex disadvantages the other.
Women aren’t disadvantaged by Sagittarians, or tennis players. It’s by men. As a class. Not some nebulous entity that we don’t quite understand.
We know what they do, we know why they do it, and we know how they do it.
Women are oppressed on the basis of their biology, and gender roles are the means by which it is done.
It’s not something that changes however you identify. However men identify, however women identify. It doesn’t change.
So you now have men beating women at sport, men taking women’s jobs in public office, violent men being transferred to female prisons, men being feted as the first ‘women’ to do something, men insisting that men are centred in feminism and demanding the end to sex segregation.
And at the same time, they are insisting that female biology is exclusionary (to men), it is a privilege, not a means of oppression and that sexual orientation doesn’t exist as it prevents men from sexual access to women.
This is men’s sexual rights activism in action. Based on biology. Not the way people think.
The benefit is only going one way.
Show me ANY way this ideology benefits women, or addresses the structural inequality from which they suffer.