I want to take issue with something that Rawr said up thread.
I posted a site called antifemale receipts. They gather together examples of rage and misogyny.
Rawr said that she couldn't take it seriously because it's just teenagers.
This happens a lot. When you point out these revolting people, you're told they don't count, for one reason or another.
This isn't logical. If paedophiles went onto Facebook and discussed the merits of a three-year-old they would be blocked and banned. The corners of the Internet are where these people lurk. It doesn't mean they don't exist.
And being a teenager does not preclude you from violent crime. A quick look at America in the last few years with gun toting teens massacring their classmates demonstrates that.
Predatory, revolting individuals exist. Whether they are on tumblr, Reddit, or hiding on the dark net. By necessity, they don't post articles in the mainstream media or go on moderated websites.
The specific example I gave lead Rawr to believe that person was a teenager. Firstly she has no way of knowing how old they are. And secondly what difference does it make? It is precisely these people whether young, middle-aged or ancient who are the threat.
Sorry, it's been bothering me. I wanted to get it off my chest (sorry breast).