I'm still struggling to see the relevance of the tantric massage and secret life angle. You seem to be saying that by establishing she has lied that affords some sort of insight, well everybody lies sometimes. Also and this is probably tied to the daily fail bias, but did one of her friends point blank ask her: "are you a secret tantric massage provider?" To which she replied in the negative. Otherwise it looks like she kept a side of her life private to certain friends/family, and I think that's a stretch to call it lying.
I think that being the case in a court setting that piece of evidence would be torn to pieces by any defense counsel that was even half awake.
You are of course right about her father, were I in his position I really don't know what I would do.
Going back to Mr Falsly accused, again that is merely my opinion of him. It seems he achieved his objective and not only "destroyed" her, but has seen fit to drag her name through the mud in the media after the fact. Honestly the only two salient facts that point to his innocence are the best sex texts, and the cctv footage. Those may indeed exonerate him in a legal sense, but not necessarily in a moral one.
To put it another way if someone comes at me in a physical alteration and I apply an appropriate amount of force to render them unable to further injure me or others, that's fine. If once having disabled them I proceed to repeatedly kick them in the head I've gone too far. Metaphorically he has done that here, she was a genuine threat to him, I accept that and he set out and achieved in utterly obliterating her in response.
Even if he is indeed innocent, and I won't debate that point as an awful lot does point in that direction, I still think he treated this poor woman abominably.