That's just another patriarchal mindfuck. "he is genderless"? Can't you see the total internal contradication in that statement. I bet your church never refers to god (not goddess) as she.
Women are just supposed to ignore all the gendering and pretend we're included too.
Christian fathers viewed women as inferior beings to the fully human men:
?Both nature and the law place the woman in a subordinate condition to the man? Irenaeus, Fragment no 32.
?It is the natural order among people that women serve their husbands and children their parents, because the justice of this lies in (the principle that) the lesser serves the greater . . . This is the natural justice that the weaker brain serve the stronger. This therefore is the evident justice in the relationships between slaves and their masters, that they who excel in reason, excel in power.? (Augustine, Questions on the Heptateuch, Book I, § 153.
?Nor can it be doubted, that it is more consonant with the order of nature that men should bear rule over women, than women over men. It is with this principle in view that the apostle says, "The head of the woman is the man;" and, "Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands." So also the Apostle Peter writes: "Even as Sara obeyed Abraham, calling him lord." Augustine, On Concupiscence, Book I, chap. 10.
?The Apostle wants women who are manifestly inferior, to be without fault, in order that the Church of God be pure? Ambrosiaster, On 1 Timothy 3,11.
?Who are there that teach such things apart from women? In very truth, women are a feeble race, untrustworthy and of mediocre intelligence. Once again we see that the Devil knows how to make women spew forth ridiculous teachings, as he has just succeeded in doing in the case of Quintilla, Maxima and Priscilla? Epiphanius, Panarion 79, §1.
Confirmation of the inferior status of women was often seen in the belief that only man, not woman, had been created in God's image:
?You (woman) destroyed so easily God's image, man.? Tertullian, De Cultu Feminarum, book 1, chap. 1.
?How, then, would God have failed to make any such concession to men more (than to women), whether on the ground of nearer intimacy, as the male being in "His own image," or on the ground of harder toil? But if nothing (has been thus conceded) to the male, much less to the female.? Tertullian, On the Veiling of Virgins, chap. 10.
? Women must cover their heads because they are not the image of God . . . How can anyone maintain that woman is the likeness of God when she is demonstrably subject to the dominion of man and has no kind of authority? For she can neither teach nor be a witness in a court nor exercise citizenship nor be a judge-then certainly not exercise dominion? Ambrosiaster, On 1 Corinthians 14, 34.
?So the soil, that is the womb, accepts the human race, and she nourishes what is her own after receiving it , and while nourishing this body, and while giving it a body, distinguishes it into various members?. Jerome, Letter to Pammachius.
?They shut themselves up alone with women and justify their sinful embraces by quoting the lines: ?The almighty father takes the earth to wife; pouring upon her fertilizing rain, that from her womb new harvest he may reap.? Jerome, Letter 133. To Ctesiphon, §3.