SardineQueen, you keep repeating over and over how 'ridiculous' and 'bizarre' the salesman was, and you are implying that I am somehow 'ridiculous' and 'bizarre' by defending him.
You may think his actions sexist- like I have said constantly throughout this thread, there are -for once!- valid points for the 'he is a sexist pig' and for 'hey, he's just a bad salesman' or 'it's usual for a couple to be involved in a joint purchase together'. ALL valid for and againsts.
But in a patriarchal society where marriage is promoted- not least because the govt can fob off support for one adult to another. Let's face it, single mothers are villified because the state cannot fob off support for them onto a big, strong man (matter of fact NOT a slagging off of single mothers so no flaming, please)- and that marriage, to be fair, is seen as a life-changing event which explicitly declares that a couple wish to be seen as a couple in every aspect of life (for that is what they are doing when getting married) it is most definitely NOT bizarre or ridiculous for somebody to use these reasons in 'defence' of the salesman.
So, disagree and offer alternative views but don't say the salesman's views are 'bizarre' because in a patriarchal society where two people who marry are seen as a joint unit, his views are entirely reasonable.
Why do you think so many feminists are against marriage? They are against it because it promotes views like two people are responsible for one another, but, given the context of the society in which he lives, his views AND mine about this matter are not bizarre at all.
Hence my :' don't like it, don't get married' view is reasonable in this context.