Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Weight loss chat

A space to talk openly about weight loss journeys and challenges. Mumsnet hasn't checked the qualifications of anyone posting here. You may wish to speak to a medical professional before starting any diet.

Why are you not taking WLI?

225 replies

Pronkey · 16/01/2026 12:18

First of all I do not look down on WLI. In fact I possibly regret not going on them as my weight loss has been very very slow (50 pounds in 18 months). With plenty of step backs after holidays, Christmas etc. I must have lost the same 7 pounds at least three times.

But I chose not to go on them as I have had horrific gallstones ever since my last pregnancy and just could not risk it after they finally went away.

My cravings have definitely reduced since I have made diet and lifestyle changes. Was living off and craving pasta before my weight loss journey. And now I can definitely take it or leave it.

Just curious to hear why you didn’t go down the WLI route?

OP posts:
Passingthrough123 · 17/01/2026 16:44

MrTiddlesTheCat · 17/01/2026 16:35

I think it was because my weight is so high (130 kg) and my body is falling apart. Last year he wanted me to work with the dietician but then breast cancer reared its ugly head and everything went to shit. Now the medical priority is getting my weight down. So the benefits outweigh the risks.

So sorry to hear you've had breast cancer. I hope you're responding well to treatment. I can see now why your GP has prescribed the jabs despite the ED.

MrTiddlesTheCat · 17/01/2026 17:28

Passingthrough123 · 17/01/2026 16:44

So sorry to hear you've had breast cancer. I hope you're responding well to treatment. I can see now why your GP has prescribed the jabs despite the ED.

Thank you, I'm now classed as cancer free although I'm still having rehab therapies. 2026 is going to be my year of recovery.

mondaytosunday · 17/01/2026 17:51

I’m a type 1 diabetic and it’s not approved for people with that.

LoserWinner · 17/01/2026 18:40

Fishingboatbobbingnight · 17/01/2026 13:44

You see this is why some of the replies are completely illogical. Obesity is life threatening. No ifs or buts about it. No ‘unknown’ side effects. At BMI 30-34.9 the average 40 year old will have a life expectancy 4.8years shorter than their healthy BMI equivalent. At BMI 35 that rises to 5.9 years.
So whilst I totally get that if you have a problem pancreas or thyroid cancer in your family why would you put yourself in the pathway of a known risk ? But if you are ALREADY in a substantial known risk to life by being obese , why would you deny yourself the chance to reduce that because of a hypothetical risk despite many millions of people using these drugs for over 4 years for weight loss and many years before in clinical trials. It makes no sense.
In an extreme comparison, think about cancer. Not all cancers are immediately life threatening. However they will shorten your life over time. When diagnosed and offered the miracle drugs of chemotherapy, with their horrendous side effects, would you refuse ?

Nobody is saying that you should “put yourself in the pathway of a known risk”. They are saying that WLIs are not the only, or even necessarily the best, way to lose weight.

I lost 6st. I reduced the risk of death or serious illness from obesity, and I did it for medical reasons.

If people who are spending a fortune on WLIs in the hope of an easy fix for obesity instead of valuing their own health enough to make long term lifestyle changes, they may need to justify it to themselves. I think there’s an element of lost cost fallacy in that kind of reasoning.

MrsLizzieDarcy · 17/01/2026 18:45

I'm type 2 diabetic and on medication. I've lost 4 stone through sheer bloody hard work but can't seem to shift another ounce. I've been rock steady at the same weight for a year. But my GP/diabetic nurse won't prescribe any WLI's and I personally feel it's too risky to try without medical supervision. And IMO a pharmacist doesn't count as someone able to do so. I'm also very worried that I could lose weight but struggle to maintain it like I've been able to maintain natural weight loss.

SilenceInside · 17/01/2026 18:54

@LoserWinner "If people who are spending a fortune on WLIs in the hope of an easy fix for obesity instead of valuing their own health enough to make long term lifestyle changes, they may need to justify it to themselves. I think there’s an element of lost cost fallacy in that kind of reasoning."

I think that the implication that people who choose to use WLI don't value their own health enough is wrong and deeply judgemental. Valuing my health is exactly why I chose to use WLI to move from being morbidly obese to being in the healthy weight range. It's not an "easy fix", it is something that has made long term consistent weight loss possible and achievable for me. I did it for medical reasons too. And it has involved long term lifestyle changes.

Great that you have lost weight without WLI, a brilliant result for you, if it's maintainable of course. But that isn't possible or achievable for everyone, and choosing a medicated approach does not mean that people are deluding themselves about their reasoning, or that they don't care enough about their health.

Wishihadanalgorithm · 17/01/2026 18:56

I really wish I could but I have no gall bladder, have had pancreatitis, thyroid issues and only 1 kidney. All of which means WLI are a big no no.

I know someone who lost about 3 stone and then stopped because of the piece and I
know someone else who lost about 6 stone but they have consistently denied using the jabs (but it’s obvious for so many reasons).

I also have other friends who are on them but they don’t appear to have lost that much. One said once she reduced her dose (because of cost) the cravings came straight back.

I don’t get why there are so many people ashamed to admit they are on the jabs. I’d tell people honestly.

Seymorbutts · 17/01/2026 19:01

I’m on them but I can tell you why my brother and SIL aren’t on them yet constantly complain about being overweight and are “jokingly” very jealous of the amount of weight I’ve lost. DB wants to do it “the proper way” so that he can “feel a sense of achievement” (even though he’s been trying for 10 years and it’s never happened). SIL is scared of the long-term side-effects.

LoserWinner · 17/01/2026 19:01

@SilenceInside Great that you have lost weight without WLI, a brilliant result for you, if it's maintainable of course.

Oh, it is - I have maintained a bmi of 19.5 for several years. Like I said, I made permanent changes.

LoserWinner · 17/01/2026 19:01

Deleted duplicate content

SilenceInside · 17/01/2026 19:13

@LoserWinner that’s a brilliant result for you that very much bucks the trend and makes you an outlier as someone who was obese, has lost the weight and maintained it long term. It’s really very few people who manage that.

fndshalom · 17/01/2026 19:29

It was only a few years ago that people were raving about vaping instead of smoking and look how that went. We won't know the full extent of the damage for some years to come
With weight loss injections I can see the benefits but think it wont be for some years that we start to see damages
I'm eating healthily and smaller amounts and losing 2 lbs a week. I need to lose 2 stone to be my ideal weight . It'll take time and self control and is quite boring but I feel more comfortable knowing I'm only making positive changes to my body rather than the nagging doubt I'd have with injections

SilenceInside · 17/01/2026 19:49

@fndshalom a better comparison would be medications that help smokers quit, like Varenicline for example. It’s also a prescription only medication. Vaping is not a medication and is simply just a less harmful way of getting nicotine, rather than a method of stopping smoking.

countdowntonap · 17/01/2026 20:28

The body WLI achieves (on the whole) isn’t the body I desire.

Silverblue1985 · 18/01/2026 00:10

I had a BMI of 35 so would have qualified (privately).

However, I didn’t go for them (lost 5st the “old” way) because

  • I have bad enough reflux issues as-is so didn’t want to take the risk of that side effect
  • I am relying on the pill working, not for contraceptive reasons but because I’d be ill for three out of four weeks without. Another risk I wasn’t willing to take - I’ve had medication mess up my pill once before and it’s not something I’d like to repeat.
  • I am generally not someone to quickly take medication. Don’t get me wrong, I will if needed based on the benefit and alternatives - but I won’t if there IS a sensible and credible alternative. (Like I’m managing my GERD through diet as much as possible).
  • As such, I don’t want to be on medication for life unless I really have to be. Maintaining is hard enough as it is, but doing it the way without medication, I am already having to deal with “food noise” while losing weight.
  • I had lost 30kg before. Yeah, I put 40kg on again after maintaining for five years. But I couldn’t see why I wouldn’t be able to do it again. (The losing bit only hopefully!)
  • I am restricted enough food-wise as is with my bad reflux - I didn’t want to be even more restricted and at least be able to enjoy the foods I can safely eat without having to worry about potentially not getting on with something due to the jabs.
Daisywhatsyouranswer · 18/01/2026 12:15

SilenceInside · 17/01/2026 15:41

Sorry, I should also have said that I am not interested in persuading anyone who doesn’t want to take WLI to do so or even to consider them.

Me neither, I don’t give a crap. I thought it was a genuine thread, and wouldn’t want a fat person to no use them due to some made up shite or over exaggerated risks. Silly me.

I do wonder if it makes people feel better to post shite or exaggerate rather than say I can’t afford them and I’m fucking miserable.

sonjadog · 18/01/2026 12:46

I can afford them and I am happy. I am also overweight and I don't want to take them. I am and shall continue losing weight without using them. Nothing made up about what I have posted here.

Daisywhatsyouranswer · 18/01/2026 14:29

sonjadog · 18/01/2026 12:46

I can afford them and I am happy. I am also overweight and I don't want to take them. I am and shall continue losing weight without using them. Nothing made up about what I have posted here.

agree totally, doesn’t seem to be any bollox there, good luck on your journey x

Passingthrough123 · 18/01/2026 15:31

Daisywhatsyouranswer · 18/01/2026 12:15

Me neither, I don’t give a crap. I thought it was a genuine thread, and wouldn’t want a fat person to no use them due to some made up shite or over exaggerated risks. Silly me.

I do wonder if it makes people feel better to post shite or exaggerate rather than say I can’t afford them and I’m fucking miserable.

Oh, OF COURSE it must all be made up. God forbid any woman dares to apply critical thinking over her own body and health to decide not to take them.

I can afford to be on jabs for the rest of my life if I wanted to. I won't because of my history of ED.

I'm not alone on this thread in being able to afford them.

Now do pop back to the WLI cult board and leave us non-believers alone.

Pollyparanoia · 18/01/2026 16:49

This is a really interesting question and one I've pondered. I've struggled with negative feelings towards my body the whole of my life and, like a lot of women, the cycle of hope and recrimination of dieting. Post children my weight stabilised in a healthy BMI but menopause has pushed it up, although I'm addressing that now with some success.

There's a notorious Times article about microdosing to lose that stubborn half stone that made me feel really tempted.

My reasons are:

  1. I don't weigh enough to qualify. Could definitely microdose or get from somewhere but I think the fact that I don't qualify should tell me something about their use/misuse.
  2. I don't like the idea of being on them for ever or fearing that I can't lose weight without them.
  3. If I have to choose between fit and not-as-slim-as-I'd-like, I'd choose fit, especially now that I'm in my 50s. I love exercise and sport, but I'm naturally pretty lazy and I think we're evolutionarily programmed to want to conserve energy if we don't need to run for food or our lives. I am so happy when I exercise and I feel so glad to have done it, but at 7am if you ask me whether I'd rather stay in bed or run, I'd always want my bed. Looking good and weight management isn't the only reason why I exercise but it's a big incentive. If I get/stay slim without exercising (and I know that people on WLI do weights etc but given that I'm not overweight to begin with I don't know that I would), then I wonder whether I'd move less. And that would be a bad thing.
Daisywhatsyouranswer · 18/01/2026 17:34

Passingthrough123 · 18/01/2026 15:31

Oh, OF COURSE it must all be made up. God forbid any woman dares to apply critical thinking over her own body and health to decide not to take them.

I can afford to be on jabs for the rest of my life if I wanted to. I won't because of my history of ED.

I'm not alone on this thread in being able to afford them.

Now do pop back to the WLI cult board and leave us non-believers alone.

Edited

Where did I say it was all made up? We all know there’s some right old bullshit being posted on here. Yes of course some is accurate, and good reasons, some is utter cringe worth shite. Trying to pretend that’s not the case makes me wonder, especially about your declaration you can afford it for life.

sure.

Passingthrough123 · 18/01/2026 18:44

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Mosssy · 18/01/2026 18:50

I could take them, even without a gallbladder i think it's still possible. I can afford them and I'm fine with needles... but... i want to lose weight on my own without a crutch. Food is an addiction, my food disorder is in my mind... WLI are just a bandaid with side effects as well and it takes so long on them I could be losing it myself.

LindorDoubleChoc · 18/01/2026 20:53

ohyesido · 16/01/2026 19:02

I saw the question asked and I answered it. Is it invitation only?

Obviously not invitation only but also - OBVIOUSLY - no one is asking a thin person why they aren't taking WLI. So why are you answering? It's just a dick move.

If I saw a thread title "Women over 5'4" do you ..." or "Parents of toddlers would you ..." or "If you're in your 30s have you ..." I wouldn't answer because these questions don't apply to me and no one cares what I answer because I wasn't asked.

Do you see?

Crikeyalmighty · 18/01/2026 21:02

@Talipesmum I’m doing it this way and we are foodie too - still eat the right things and cook well but went down to 2 meals - a 500 cal 11.00am brunch ( usually cottage cheese, ham, hard boiled eggs, Greek yoghurt type thing - and up to 750 in evening . Still make curries, bolognese, chillis , tagines etc - and ample portions too -use cauliflower rice and mix it in.

I did 6 weeks MJ, hated the heartburn and felt like I had morning sickness 4 days a week