That JFK one is an interesting part of the rabbit hole - where CTs diverge and may or may not contain some truth in one respect, but be completely ridiculous in others. Some may believe that the false paths are deliberately begin and promoted by those who don't want you to find the true one!
I think the official narrative of the assassination of JFK leaves some very big legitimate questions open for consideration. The actual logistics of his shooting and how the bullet arrived in him; and Executive order 11110, which was going through having been issued by JFK (and mysteriously repealed after his death), which big, powerful bankers may well not have wanted, just for two.
However, I personally (and I would guess the vast majority of us) have no doubt that JFK did indeed die that day and thus was gone out of the picture.
Talking of EO 11110, the Titanic is another one that some people question, whereby some very powerful people who were opposed to the establishing of the Federal Reserve, and could have thwarted the plan, happened to be on the ship and died when it went down. Might the two be linked; or might they have been just separate tragedies/lone-wolf crimes that happen to have some interesting coincidences?
There's also the separate CT about the Titanic, whereby it was secretly switched with another (known to be damaged) ship in order to fraudulently claim a huge amount of insurance money.
Are both Titanic CTs true; are they both false; is one true and the other false - and if so, was the false one spread deliberately to take the heat off the true one?! Whatever the truth of it all, I really don't see why people should be slapped down and instantly told that they're lunatics just for asking questions.