Ham pr disasters 58! …things are getting strange….I’m starting to worry….this could be a case for mulder and scully! ..

[jeffgoldblum]

Well ….confusion reigns supreme! , more and more information dribbling out! , still no idea what is going on! ….its time for outside help!

Wasn't there one little girl on MasterChef who she was really unnecessarily harsh on? I seem to remember wincing while watching the clip. I always get the impression that she doesn't like children.

Link Lauren has got it spot on, saying everything we are saying on here, all of this from day one is way too coordinated and she’s using this to try to play the victim and get everyone to forget the past few years, he thinks it’s all about turning her brand around and I agree, I think that’s been her plan all along.

https://youtube.com/shorts/BakB3HmplZU?is=MAhb9RFPu9hNeJcC

As Jeff said, flattered but not interested. It's interesting that you think I was being horrible rather than sympathetic to two children dragged around behind their ghastly parents.

Anyway, first and last engagement with you.

After this current scenario, and on top of the cringeworthy visit to Nottingham, their titles will seem increasingly ironic and irrelevant. KC doesn’t need to fall into the trap of removing them - HaM will just become more and more embarrassing as time goes on.

Does the met have a retention policy?
Eg you have to keep financial information fir 7 years.

I woukd expect them to have some sort of policy for how long they normally keep information that they didn't act on.
Would be interesting to know if that is the case,and whether they'd expect it to be destroyed ages ago, only just, ir not yet.

Exactly. All the RF have to do? Carry on as they've done for the last 7 years. The Sussexes will continue to be hoisted by their own petard.

Turns out they do (this is in response to a FOI request

https://www.met.police.uk/foi-ai/metropolitan-police/disclosure-2023/december-2023/records-management-legislation-guidance-processes/

Oh wow. Isn’t it fascinating reading that article in the cold light of day, today?

I like your thinking on the 2019 letter btw - Meg might not have realised the Met would have logged its ingress into their offices.

It also strikes me, looking at Roslyn’s piece to camera, that she did not in 2018-19 possess the vocabulary used in that letter now attributed to her (based on the parts we have so far seen). Did she have help?

The Guardian in this piece reckons Meg really is fucking off to Australia in 2027 where Poh can do more of her ecstatic-about-Meghan-being-royalty faces.

Having said that, it reads as though it was written by Meg’s PR. Slow hand clap for Guardian journalist Emma Joyce (no, me neither).

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2026/oct/27/meghan-duchess-of-sussex-junior-masterchef-australia-it-ntwnfb

Why are some people in Australia so thrilled with her?

How can it be an 'easy yes'

Either drag the kids over or leave them behind - I can't see how either decision is easy

I assume this came up on the last thread (I only got about halfway before it ran away from me!) but what really annoyed me last night was the stories I read about Meghan being devastated about the news coming out, taking the kids out of the country to try and escape the news, being in floods of tears trying to come to terms with it etc.

I’ve never heard such shit in my life.

By her own account she’s known this horrific information for 8 years. So what is there to come to terms with??

The media storm around her right now is entirely of her own making because if she’d just kept her mouth shut then there’s no chance it would be anywhere near as big as it is.

And finally it’s another way to make herself the victim in this whole dreadful situation, as well as continuing to feed the media and keep the story going.

I’m sick to the back teeth of the journalists that are peddling their narrative without any critical thought.
In the very best case scenario of this whole rotten mess, Meghan has been selfish and utterly uncaring towards any child or family but her own, because she knew something awful for nearly a decade and did absolutely nothing to try and see if it was being investigated properly.

And if you believe her version of “assuming” it had been investigated, if nothing had happened after that many years, wouldn’t you come to the conclusion maybe there was no evidence of wrongdoing and therefore you were hasty to cut your father off? Rather than double down on the accusations in 2025?

Honestly there’s more holes in the whole thing than a sieve and she’s being let to get away with murder on this by the MSM for the most part who are swallowing the utter nonsense they’re given fed.

(Also it’s half term and the Sussex PR told us weeks ago they were taking the kids to Portugal on holiday so this is a planned holiday not a desperate bid to escape the UK)

Definitely churnalism there (for the poster who mentioned this, the term comes from Nick Davies, former Guardian journo, ironically)

For me it would be hard to leave young DC but I know I'd have been leaving them with their competent, loving dad and in their secure and familiar home. Plus I don't have a fixation on me and my DH being 'salt and pepper who move together' or a worry that his family might get to him in my absence!

I maintain that another move so soon is the last thing those children need. Even though their mother being away is also not ideal.

And if Meghan kept a copy of a letter without the knowledge of the police, her office, and the letter writer, and the letter contained sensitive material about a named other person, and Meghan took this document secretly to the US and back here to a private residence in the Cotswolds storing it in her personal stash: has she broken GDPR / the Data Protection Act? Roslyn’s dead, but the subject Thomas Snr isn’t.

And if you believe her version of “assuming” it had been investigated, if nothing had happened after that many years, wouldn’t you come to the conclusion maybe there was no evidence of wrongdoing and therefore you were hasty to cut your father off? Rather than double down on the accusations in 2025?

100% agree. Essentially she's weaponising CSA to justify cutting her father off. This all stinks of collusion with her brother. What the end game is I have no idea but she's front and centre in the press again and everyone's talking about her. Not the royal tour or anything else the royals are doing.

Why she went into acting when she's a natural at PR I have no idea.

They probably aren't, at least not many. No doubt they just get her foisted upon them, like the rest of us.

I can't see the benefit to anyone. She can't cook and she can't deal with people.
The only thing is her royal title and I'm surprised Australians go for that.

This is utterly bizarre. Why would they give her a copy? Something is really fishy here.

There are so many more questions than answers. The HaMs have made a complete cluster fuck of this situation.

Complete collusion... she literally had her statement out hours after his bombshell with the same publication.

They must be quite desperate to want a shady old creature like her. Clearly the show is struggling and they have to just take what they can get.

Yes, I suppose it gets attention.

HAM got what they want. Front and centre of headlines again. This is a win for them

"Look at how the media loves us! you HAVE to take us back! never mind that everything we do is like watching a motorway pile-up, we're STARS!!"

Except if you read the comments, no one believes her. All these YouTube videos with reporters saying poor Meghan and enormous pushback in the comments.

I'm wondering if the investigation will cast doubt on the whole case.