Am dumping this here from a post I did on another thread tonight, just because I cba to formulate again! Please excuse the formatting, I’m still getting used to using the app as I’ve given up on the glitchy website (which is a whole different thread 😂)
I can’t even with the lengthy word salad posts right now. Just to boil it down.
Nobody expects Meghan to have been a crime fighter, detective, sleuth or whatever dismissive terms have been flung about over the last few days. Whatever way you break it down, it’s really quite simple.
Point 1 - Meghan was told something so awful 7/8 years ago and she cut contact with TM (I’m keeping it simple here and ignoring the fact that she’d already cut contact with him). She’s told it’s being investigated. In the following years there’s the “leaked” letter to her dad (which involved a court case), many interviews/tv shows that I cba to list, H taking the blame for the rift, direct quotes blaming the media. Yes, she got flak over time for the perceived treatment of him - that flak was a result of the narrative that both HaM had put out there themselves. The worst part, if this is true why she cut him off then (note, months after she’d already cut him off), then it is absolutely shocking that she seemingly never followed up/politely asked/however else you want to phrase it ANYONE re how the assured investigation was proceeding. Eight fucking years. Eight years of zilch, nada, nothing. Honestly, I keep reading with incredulity the people saying along the lines of investigations take time/can’t insert herself into an investigation/these things are complicated. No. You do not shrug your shoulders for eight years and not query wtaf is going on with regards to an accusation serious enough to cut your father out of your life (months after you’ve already cut him out of your life, but I’m going with her timeline here!).
Point 2 - For some reason, M decided to writer her Dec 2025 letter to TM. Maybe because of media commentary re her being a tad heartless to her father who yes, had behaved like a shit with some of his interviews. But people were looking at it with the narrative that HaM had fed over the years re cutting him off for colluding with the media. In the light of ALL the public trashing the two of them had done towards the WRF, it obviously looked hypocritical. So, performative delivery of said letter to TM in hospital, by someone from the consulate no less, with the delivery filmed and TM signing a receipt of delivery also filmed. Very OTT and a fair amount of effort on M’s part for this. In that letter M informs him she knows he’s an abuser and he’ll never see her children. So, even if Point One above is completely erased, M put in writing over 10 months ago that he was an abuser. What did she do about it? Because it doesn’t appear she alerted any appropriate agencies/forces/whatever. But it’s now in the public domain that she knew/suspected, at the very least, 10 months ago. And still seems to have done fuck all - apart from a performative, filmed (gosh, shocker), delivery of said letter to TM in hospital having just had his leg amputated. Colour me cynical, but that was a receipt for a “shock” reveal once TM died. Unfortunately, her press clap back last week has fucked things up. So keen to say “and now you know why I don’t speak to him so up yours to the press and public’. She’s invited a whole different level of scrutiny by bring up the 2018/19 letter - no one had a clue about its existence.
Whichever way you spin it, she either knew/suspected for 8/7 years or for 10 months. To seemingly have no interest, beyond “I was told it was being handled” is beyond words. That shit doesn’t fly when you position yourself as [insert long list of everything they’ve called themselves over the years]?
Is M responsible for what her father may have done? No. But she’s totally responsible for her seemingly not bothered/wash her hands of it attitude, whether that was for 8/7 years or 10 months (god, I’m getting tired of trying to cover all the timeline possibilities, fuck knows what it’s like trying to keep on top of it in real time for (HaM).
The above is not even attempting to put into context everything that has come out of their mouths in the intervening years - because it would take hours to to do that 😂. They have offloaded many grievances. The fact that they have, apparently, been silent re possible CSA is beyond words. And by silent, I don’t mean doing what they normally do re their grievances. I mean by, seemingly, not following up with any relevant authority to even ask if there is any progress in a supposed investigation. Everything they’ve done before was shitty - but it was against an institution that has been around forever and has a lot of support and resources. This situation potentially is regarding some of the most vulnerable in society.
TLDR : for the foreseeable, I don’t think there will be any lengthy, pretzel-type post that will dissuade me from thinking that they are awful people and only interested in themselves.