Ham pr disasters 58! …things are getting strange….I’m starting to worry….this could be a case for mulder and scully! ..

[jeffgoldblum]

Well ….confusion reigns supreme! , more and more information dribbling out! , still no idea what is going on! ….its time for outside help!

Someone said on an earlier thread that H&M are like naughty toddlers - they would rather get negative attention than no attention

I thought that was a very accurate summing up of their behaviour

And they certainly show no signs of maturing which, in their 40's, is a very sad state of affairs

If they divorce I'd imagine a path may be made for Harry or possibly not?

, when on camera.

She comes across well, seems genuinely interested in what she’s doing, not all word salady and taking herself too seriously, not trying too hard to the point where you wince.

Maybe Cooking On TV in Australia is the reset that can permit that version of herself back.

But if he has dementia as is reported, he isn’t going to be able to do that

@MajesticMeanderings Any publicity is good publicity.

HAM could not say nothing or state it was a private matter as that would go against their "we are not private citizens" leaks/statements following KC clarification on their return to the UK.

With the announcement of the Australia gig, it’s almost like she has moved on from the recent furious surrounding her father, and on to the shallow and fluffy things that are more to her taste, though

Meghan might want to forget that appearance with Matt Lauer who was involved in a sex scandal himself where he promised to help younger women's careers in exchange for sex.

It was an acting role for her - grilling lettuce hardly requires great culinary skill - like the one she got grilling meat in a skimpy outfit for a men's magazine. She used to get a few cooking spots when she was dating/living with celebrity chef Cory Vitiello.

At this stage, I actually can't see a divorce. Harry needs the headlines / publicity / drama as much as her. Would he have that as a single Middle Aged private citizen?

Well, she may not have got the wealth, fame & status she dreamed of but one thing she has truly got is infamy

As in "Infamy, infamy, they've all got it in for me"

Yes it is a very jarring change of subject. It's like "last week I was talking about CSA but forget that because I'm off to Aus to cook with the kids".

I know we hate the gossip sites but there was an interesting one yesterday. Apparently she is freaking out because the FBI wish to interview her about the letters - what she knew and when.

She isn’t responsible for other people’s misdeeds.

It’s an example of a version of her that is in there somewhere, which is a lot less jarring than other versions of her. In the context of cooking on TV

Australian cooking on TV is an opportunity for that version of her to make a come back.

I can’t make them make good choices obviously . But I can see why somebody might try to persuade them that this direction is one of the better ones on the table.

One more quick one , and am happy to be contradicted if I am wrong ( please do ) If M has a job with Australian Masterchef , and H& the children may join her , this doesn't necessarily say that they will be uprooted from school. I don't know how long a season of Masterchef takes to be filmed , but H&the Hamlets could join her for a holiday over Easter or Summer. DH once spent two to three months in the US for work & I managed and then joined him for the holiday. I'm not commenting on what they have signed up for , I'm just saying a one off work thing can be managed with two parents without disrupting the children. I don't know but I am trying to be fair to them.

My pictures are under a lengthy review but they are all pictures that have appeared in the MSM.

Harry at a 2016 Invictus event tweaking a competitors nipple. (reported in the Daily Mirror)

Harry in his 20s on a drunken night out in Namibia licking a male friend's nipple

Harry as a 20 something grabbing an unimpressed Natalie Pinkham boob (the Sun)

@Lunde

How horrific! But don't forget - he's a Prince, and they have Droit de Seigneur over anyone they choose!

Harry won't go. I really don't think he'll ever leave the UK (my sympathies)

Don’t forget the time he slapped a lifeguard on the arse!!

It’s like she (and Harry) don’t seem to understand that there are real world consequences for their actions and their attempts to further their victimhood. They cast aspersions on the royal family with veiled accusations of racism, lack of care when Meghan had suicidal ideations, making them unsafe by not providing security etc. and then come swanning (😎) back saying the equivalent of “it was all nothing, let’s be friends”. Harry gets involved in court cases with no merit because he has hurty feels. Now Meghan wants to cast her father as a paedophile, not because she wants to see justice for those wronged, but because it should make people “feel sorry” for her. Neither of them seem to have any clue that these are serious matters and that other people can’t just leave them behind like the Sussexes seem able to do

He's well into that

My post was a response to a post about the lifeguard being slapped on the arse

The strangest one I've heard is the one about placing a tablet (? paracetamol) on a journalist's tongue - utterly bizarre (even by H's standards)

But my money says he won’t get it! Which is good because he doesn’t deserve any olive branches.
They’ve both been total hypocrites and totally self serving - it’s now all backfired because most people now see them as they really are. ….. what is the MN phrase? If someone shows you who they are believe them!

Or punched the Foo Fighters drummer, or manhandled and threw several horrified young women into a swimming pool at a party.

Loathsome, super-entitled, crude, obnoxious behaviour.

And we have to listen to lectures about MH and self respect from this man.

Oh dear...

I disagree. At that time back in 2019 when MM was an active and high profile working member of the RF - and QE2 was in arguably the deepest and darkest trough with her AMW issues - this may well have been a singular collaboration where both BP and MM goals were aligned - and maybe still are. Bury it, ignore it, lose it.

Maybe they all did believe and hoped it was just a malicious letter with no evidence - and maybe it was at the time but the Mets responsibly was to pass it on not lose it.

The police on day one said they were referring themselves to the IOPC for their handling of it - that hasn’t happened yet.

It’s legitimate to ask who saw this letter and when and what decisions and actions were taken. Only the IOPC will be able to answer that it seems.

You have absolutely no evidence, however you are most determined to blame the RF for something, anything in this.
It's quite extraordinary.