Please or to access all these features

The royal family

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Earl Spencer's book on Diana is stolen

635 replies

JustHereForTheShitsAndGiggles · 16/09/2026 01:04

Warning - DM link ahead...
Copies of Earl Spencer's sensational book about Princess Diana have been stolen from a lorry – just before its exclusive serialisation in the Daily Mail.
The memoir – Swan Song: Diana, My Sister – includes revelations about Diana's deeply unhappy marriage with the then Prince of Wales.
It also describes the crisis that engulfed the Royal Family after her death in a car crash almost 30 years ago.
Last night a publishing insider said: 'Earl Spencer has kept his silence for nearly 30 years and what he has to say about the King's reaction when Diana died is utterly devastating.'
But, in an astonishing development, the Mail can reveal that a truck packed with thousands of copies of the book was broken into after it was parked overnight in a lay-by in the Netherlands earlier this week.
Just four copies, which had been wrapped in black plastic to hide their contents, were stolen in what publishing sources believe could have been an audacious plot to steal the highly anticipated book of the year before it hits the shelves.

Earl Spencer's bombshell new book is stolen: Several copies of Earl's explosive book about his sister Diana - and how King reacted to her death - are taken in raid on a Dutch lorry | Daily Mail Online

Copies of Earl Spencer's book about sister Diana are taken in raid

The memoir - Swan Song: Diana, My Sister - includes revelations about Diana's deeply unhappy marriage with the then Prince of Wales.

https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-16134057/Earl-Spencers-bombshell-new-book-stolen-copies-Earls-explosive-book-sister-Diana-King-reacted-death-taken-raid-Dutch-lorry.html

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
OneLilacHedgehog · 17/09/2026 19:14

Fondmemories · 17/09/2026 19:11

Exactly this. What an absolute shit show. His father also probably doesn't have long to live.

He could walk away from the monarchy?

SeptemberRains · 17/09/2026 19:14

@Uricon2
Yes, and his own 13 year old son is in Eton - the same age and in the same school that he was when Diana’s Panorama interview was broadcast.

Uricon2 · 17/09/2026 19:15

OneLilacHedgehog · 17/09/2026 19:14

He could walk away from the monarchy?

He could, I'm sure he won't, but if anyone is an innocent party in all this it's him.

TishToshByGosh · 17/09/2026 19:23

The 'revelations' so far are nothing but opinion and hearsay. Charles (Windsor) 'sounded' giddy and elated after Diana's death - so what? He was probably still in shock at that point - meaningless.

'A close friend of Diana's' claimed Charles told Diana he didn't love her before the marriage - come on, that's pathetic, a tenth-rate 'source'.

The comment about forgetting Diana - BP have effectively denied this - so one Charles's word against the others.

KittyCorncrake · 17/09/2026 19:28

TheOvertGardener · 16/09/2026 01:58

Sounds like PR

This

Puzzledandpissedoff · 17/09/2026 19:46

Uricon2 · 17/09/2026 19:10

The person I feel most sorry for in all this is William, a wife who has been seriously ill, stuck between his father, his brother and now his uncle and further hurts alleged against his mother brought into the public gaze.

I really wouldn't blame him if he ever said " B*llocks to all this", TBH.

I couldn't agree more, Uricon2; whatever the reality William at least has managed to keep his image "clean" and I can't imagine he's pleased

Cucurella · 17/09/2026 20:08

I’ve met Charles Spencer through work. Good looking, charming, but a horrible individual. A nasty piece of work and I’m old enough to remember the terrible ‘joke’ he made about his first wife Victoria. A woman with an eating disorder.

I don’t have any sort of biased view about the royal family, but I believe this book is about nothing other than money. Deplorable. And I believe the timing of Harry and Meghans return to the UK is linked to this.

Charles is an elderly man who has cancer, who was divorced from Diana when she died. And William doesn’t need this.

It’s a family story being sold for money and clicks but there are real people with emotions involved in this and it’s an absolute shitshow. And sadly it will do nothing to improve relations between William and Harry.

CathyorClaire · 17/09/2026 20:19

Even William disgracefully repeating the ‘paranoid’ lie

Yes.

And I'd add the equally disgraceful pressure he placed on the publicly funded BBC to suppress the Panorama interview. One of the few records we have in Diana's own words and one which should be freely available to both historians and the nation who paid for it alike.

As for Spencer's claims I'm on the fence.

That's not to say I couldn't see the notoriously petulant C3 hissing outrageousness down a telephone line but I think we need more context than we're ever going to get in one-sided reports of a private conversation.

foxylady2 · 17/09/2026 20:21

In case you don't have it already here its is - part 1.

WORLD EXCLUSIVE
‘On the night Diana died Charles sounded giddily elated… like a lottery winner’
PART ONE
By Charles Spencer,
Princess Diana's brother

I was at my home in Cape Town, alone with my four children, when I learnt that my sister had been killed.
The phone next to my bed rang in the middle of the night. It was my sister Jane, calling to let me know that Diana (whom we called by her childhood family nickname Duch, short for Duchess) had been involved in a car crash in Paris.
She apparently had an injury – it might possibly be a broken leg, but nothing more than that.

Diana wearing an iconic royal heirloom, the Lover's Knot tiara, and a white Catherine Walker dress on an official visit to Hong Kong, 1989
Jane’s husband, Robert Fellowes, was the Queen’s Private Secretary, so I felt confident that he would have access to accurate information.
Despite the reassurance, I padded quietly downstairs and turned on the kitchen TV.
The gravity of the crash had yet to sink in. The tone was, as had somehow become normal since her divorce a year earlier, patronising, misogynistic and dismissive.
Such constant, carping criticism had long been encouraged by Diana’s enemies in the Palace. There was no compassion for a human who must be in distress.
Jane and I spoke frequently as the situation became more worrying. The brutality of the crash became clear when it was confirmed that Diana’s boyfriend, Dodi Fayed, and the French driver of their car, Henri Paul, had died instantly, on impact.
And then, on perhaps our fifth or sixth call that night, when escalating dread had us both floundering a bit for words, I heard my brother-in-law, Robert, talking in the background on the work line in their home. ‘Oh, no!’ he half bellowed, half sighed in disbelief.

Dodi Al Fayed and Diana entering the Ritz Hotel in Paris, on the day they were killed in a car crash
And Jane, witnessing the completeness of his shock, relayed to me, in a soft voice: ‘That’s it… it’s curtains… Duch is dead…’

‘Rest assured,’ Charles hissed, ‘we’ll forget Diana soon enough!’

To many, the death of an icon who had become a backdrop to their lives might have been too bewildering to comprehend that morning. But to me, awake for hours, it was immediately clear that the paparazzi had recklessly endangered, then snuffed out, Diana’s life, claiming the driver and Dodi as collateral damage.

Police remove the crumpled wreckage of the Mercedes-Benz which had been carrying Diana and Dodi from the Pont d'Alma tunnel
The phone rang constantly. Prince Charles caught me as I crossed the landing upstairs.
Unlike my other callers, who were stunned, barely able to articulate their condolences and offers of help, he sounded giddily elated – like a lottery winner, I remember thinking at the time.
He let me know he had informed William and Harry of their mother’s death, first thing that morning, in their bedrooms at Balmoral. It all sounded strangely matter-of-fact, given the enormity of the disaster.
Looking back now, I suspect the prince’s first reaction must have been to think more of how this event might free him to marry the woman he loved, rather than appreciating the loss of one he did not. It can be hard to feel too much sympathy for an ex-spouse, or those who care for them profoundly, after bitter divorce.

A distraught Earl Spencer addresses journalists gathered outside his Cape Town home on the day his sister died

I was chosen to be the point of contact for my family when it came to Diana’s funeral arrangements.
Once it was correctly decided, after my family appreciated the public need for it, that Diana’s service should be a full-blown national ceremony, Buckingham Palace and Prince Charles’s offices felt entitled to take the lead.
Diana remained theirs, in Buckingham Palace’s eyes, even in death. Her family, despite her divorce, were simply expected to fall into line with any royal decisions.
It is at moments like this that even the most ardent monarchist finds that questions about arrogance and entitlement arise.
My sisters knew that Diana had always wanted Mozart’s Requiem to be played for her, after her death. But when I passed this on, it was rejected as a possibility: ‘No part of a requiem can be played at a Church of England funeral,’ I was told.

Diana and Charles in South Korea, in November 1992, on their final royal tour together. The couple announced their separation the following month
I later found out that was not the case – the first of several untruths that the authorities would push my way at that time.
Meanwhile, there were very serious tensions between the two principal royal teams: the Queen’s, in Buckingham Palace, and Prince Charles’s, in St James’s Palace. These were caused by the heir to the throne’s growing frustrations at being a middle-aged man still waiting to reign.

Against this backdrop, there was no thought of anyone in the Royal Family talking to me directly about the funeral arrangements. As was usual, such a delicate and personal interaction was farmed out to a courtier.
Lieutenant Colonel Malcolm Ross proved to be a classic, clipped voiced Old Etonian Guards officer whose role at Buckingham Palace, then, was Comptroller of the Lord Chamberlain’s Office. This placed him in charge of ceremonial and official events that the Queen was to attend.
He always treated me with extreme courtesy. When, during our first conversation, he passed me his condolences on Diana’s loss, he clearly meant it.
There were others in the Palace, I already knew, who were relieved – ­indeed, pleased – that she had gone.

A sea of flowers left by the public built up in front of Kensington Palace, Diana's former residence, in the days after her death
During one of our phone calls, Colonel Ross seemed about to ring off when he added: ‘Oh! Another thing. It’s been decided that the two young princes will walk behind the princess’s coffin.’
‘Well, that’s not going to happen,’ I said, in a ­matter-of-­fact tone. It was a suggestion that struck me as utterly barbaric, and quite out of the question.
By this stage I had learnt that Diana had left me as her sons’ guardian. This was a role without legal function while the other parent lived, but it made me feel empowered to speak on Diana’s behalf with William and Harry in mind. I knew that she would never have wanted her boys to have to undertake such a public ordeal.
‘Well, the Prince of Wales says it is,’ Ross repeated, assuming that would end the matter.
‘No,’ I said. ‘I’m afraid it’s not happening. Diana would never have wanted to put them through anything so ghastly.’

On the day before Diana's funeral, Charles accompanies his sons at Kensington Palace to view flowers and mementoes left by mourners
Ross, clearly perplexed now, politely and speedily said his goodbyes.
A few minutes later, my direct line rang again. It was Prince Charles, sounding markedly less upbeat than when we had last spoken, on the morning of Diana’s death.
‘I gather you’ve got a problem with the funeral arrangements,’ he said testily.
‘No, I don’t think so,’ I said, my mind on the structure of the service as it was coming together.
‘But I gather you’ve said you don’t want William and Harry to walk behind Diana’s coffin.’
‘Well, of course not, sir. Diana would never have wanted that.’
‘But I did it at Lord Mountbatten’s funeral!’
‘But you were 30, sir, and he wasn’t your mother.’
He went nuts. ‘That’s the problem with your family. They’ve got no bloody sense of duty!’ he started, before descending into a general rage.
As he ranted, I thought of my family and its long history of duty.
Of my father, a soldier and a courtier who years before, as an equerry, had had a romantic connection with the future Queen Elizabeth II, which was ended by Lord Mountbatten.

He summoned my father and told him that any ambitions he had for securing her affections were out of the question. He must end whatever nonsense he was part of.
Perhaps Mountbatten was clearing the way for his nephew, Prince Philip. Whatever, my father, brought up on a code of respect for the Royal Family and having spent years in the military obeying senior officers, stepped aside as commanded.
Afterwards, he loathed Mountbatten with a passion.
I thought of my two grandmothers – stalwart servants and companions to this bellowing buffoon’s grandmother. Also of all the generations of Spencers who had served King, Queen and Country dutifully, as ambassadors, admirals, courtiers, politicians and viceroys.
Above all, I thought of Diana, who had been the epitome of duty during her time as princess. However complicated the course of her public life, she had always tried to put her duty to the Queen first.
Prince Charles continued his stream of anger, without me interrupting. Then he stopped.
I assumed the pause signalled an effort to bring himself under control, but then he unleashed down the phone what I have always taken to be his pent-­up contempt for Diana, and his horror that the world was so bowled over by her death: ‘Rest assured,’ he hissed, ‘we’ll forget her soon enough!’

CathyorClaire · 17/09/2026 20:24

I really wouldn't blame him if he ever said " Bllocks to all this", TBH.*

I wish he would.

But he won't.

foxylady2 · 17/09/2026 20:24

I was so stunned that it took me a few seconds to reply. ‘I can’t believe you just said that,’ I said flatly, before hanging up.I later found out, from a friend in Downing Street, that among the senior figures in the Queen’s and Prince Charles’s households there had been a lot of discussion about who should walk behind the coffin.
Prince Charles was insisting that he wanted to do so. It is hard to see why, given his feelings for Diana. Also, an ex is never expected to act as chief mourner at their former spouse’s funeral. But he was adamant.
Sir Robin Janvrin, the Queen’s Deputy Private Secretary, told the committee planning the funeral that if Prince Charles went ahead, then I must be persuaded to walk with him.
This was out of fear that, if Prince Charles walked alone, members of the public might shout abuse at him. The committee realised that if they could persuade William and Harry to be there too, that would surely guarantee against insults flying.

How to deal with Prince Charles’s odd wish to walk behind Diana’s coffin exercised many minds for some time.
Colonel Ross got back in touch with me, the day before the funeral.
‘Good news! Princes William and Harry have decided that they want to walk behind their mother’s coffin,’ he reported, with cheery relief in his voice, ‘provided their grandfather Prince Philip walks beside them.’
I replied that I was fine with this, while making a handwritten note of my proviso: ‘as long as they are not being dragooned’ into doing so. I was assured by Colonel Ross that this was not the case.

From the start, as her brother, I felt reassured that my sister’s love for the heir to the throne was not only true, but almost palpable.
Diana had grown up with a clear objective in mind: to marry for love. She was sure that this was the most important thing, so she could avoid the divorce that had overtaken our parents and devote herself to the children she was always so keen to have.

foxylady2 · 17/09/2026 20:26

On the day of Diana’s wedding I woke early and went to Clarence House, where I found her already in her wedding dress, sitting quietly in front of a mirror.
Only much later would I discover that, as she confided to a close friend, her husband-­to-­be had told her the previous day that she needed to know he was very happy to marry her, but he was not actually in love with her.
Diana had to absorb that hammer blow while also feeling certain that Prince Charles was entering their marriage with his heart elsewhere.
A month after her engagement, she had been photographed in tears saying goodbye to Prince Charles as he was about to board a plane on official business.

Newspapers cooed with delight at what they thought to be the pain of a lovestruck innocent being parted from her fiancé.
The truth was very different. Diana was completely at sea, having found a bracelet that Prince Charles had bought for Camilla.
A month or so after that, she became so concerned she even tried to break off their engagement.
The catalyst was Prince Andrew’s 21st birthday party, hosted by the Queen and Prince Philip at Windsor Castle, at which I was also one of the 650 guests.
Prince Charles had returned that day from an official trip to New York and Diana had been greatly looking forward to being reunited and spending the party at his side.

But he had shown next to no interest in her, and she – deeply hurt, confused and increasingly concerned – ­danced with others, including me, instead.
Immediately after that evening of escalating heartbreak, Diana went to see my father. She told him she could not go through with marriage to a man who clearly did not love her.
My father was appalled and said it was impossible to pull out of such an enormous commitment at that point.
Maybe he had spent too many years in thrall, and in service, to the Queen to put his duty as a father first.
He always adored Diana, but what she was proposing was counter to the code on which he had been brought up, and which he never seemed to question.
He could not agree to her breaking her engagement, and so deeply embarrassing the Royal Family.
She would tell me much later that on the day of her wedding she had been in the throes of her eating disorder for five months.
She had recoiled from her engagement day photographs feeling that, at ten and a half stone, her 5ft 10in frame looked heavier than she wanted it to.
Her insecurity was increased a few days after the engagement announcement when Prince Charles had squeezed her waist and said, ‘Oh, a bit chubby here, aren’t we?’
This was a comment she found devastating (she would later share with me that her waist shrank from 29 to 23½ inches between her engagement and her marriage).
Meanwhile, the royal machine swung into action to claim her life. A letter was sent to our long-term family GP, Mike Bloomer, a close friend of my mother and stepfather, informing him that he was no longer to tend to Diana: the royal doctors would be taking over her care now.
But Dr Bloomer, offended by the Palace’s highhandedness, wrote back, objecting. He said he had known Diana for most of her life, and this would surely make him useful to her still.
He was quickly slapped down, and dismissed without Diana’s approval.

She was handed over to Dr John Batten, a 58-­year-­old who had been the Queen’s physician since 1974 – a man she did not know at all.
This was, I believe, a monumental blunder.
Mike Bloomer had successfully helped people we knew well with similar dependency battles to the one Diana was now facing. He could hardly have done worse than the medical team my sister was reluctantly committed to. I am sure that he would most likely have done better.

Her weight loss had returned with a vengeance after she gave birth to William, less than a year after her wedding.
Diana would later tell me how she had been fine in the days immediately after the birth. Then she suddenly began to feel isolated and trapped. She believed that her husband was sometimes too busy for her, and on other occasions that he was critical.
She told me he had married a 20-year-old but seemed always to wish she was nearer to 35, in character and outlook.
What may have been intended by him as helpful suggestions – as to clothing, how to interact with members of the public, and what pastimes to ­pursue – were taken as reproaches by a young wife who felt that she was trying her very best.
I am convinced now that Diana had ADHD, and that as part of that condition she suffered from Rejection Sensitive Dysphoria (as do I). This is an intense emotional pain in the face of others’ rejection or criticism, which amplified her wounded response to her husband’s suggestions.
As someone who has been divorced three times (from women who are all double divorcées), I am fully aware, from personal knowledge, and the experience of those I have loved, how challenging marriage can be.
I am not hypocritical enough to judge or criticise anyone else’s marital record. I am merely recording how my sister felt and am not assessing whether she was right or not.
She told me that things became very difficult indeed in the marriage early on, and I am sure that both spouses despaired of the other at times.

foxylady2 · 17/09/2026 20:28

Everything must have been so much harder for each of them, starting out in a union where the world was demanding a narrative of make-­believe perfection when the reality could only be different. I feel huge sympathy for them both. It must have been intolerable.
Diana told me there was even talk of a temporary separation, early on, and experts were summoned to see what therapeutic support could be given.
The newlyweds were advised to compose a contract, with both spouses finding areas where they might surrender a little to the other, so the relationship could survive.
There was, at this time, concern at Diana having explosive outbursts when she was at her unhappiest. Palace witnesses to these spoke up for Prince Charles, as they would, and said that at times Diana struck them as troubled.
When members of our family were questioned, they were adamant that Diana had never exhibited any such behaviour before the wedding.
It is a sad fact that, in her later years, Diana drove herself more than once to Beachy Head, the highest chalk sea cliff in England, while contemplating ending it all. Her love for her sons stopped her from going further.

ne day Diana asked me at very short notice to join her for lunch at San Lorenzo, her favourite London restaurant. She looked down at the table and said, ‘Carlos, I’m going to get divorced.’
I was silent for a moment. I had known things were bad, but not this bad.
‘Well, Duch,’ I carefully replied, ‘you of course have my full support… I know you’ll have thought this through. But my main worry is the public. I fear they won’t forgive you. They’ve bought into a fairytale, and I reckon they may ­well – wrongly – blame you for destroying their fantasy.’
She looked up at me, nodded, and said quietly: ‘But, Carlos, my husband is in love with his valet.’
I gulped. ‘Well, I guess, in that case, you really don’t have a choice.’
She did not name the member of staff, and I never asked her who it was, or why she would believe such an improbable thing.
It was not important: the end of her marriage, and of her dreams, was.

Part two coming tomorrow...

CathyorClaire · 17/09/2026 20:32

My sisters knew that Diana had always wanted Mozart’s Requiem to be played for her, after her death.

This seems quite a surprising thing for a 36 year old to have both considered and then passed on to elder siblings.

BasiliskStare · 17/09/2026 20:36

@CathyorClaire "That's not to say I couldn't see the notoriously petulant C3 hissing outrageousness down a telephone line but I think we need more context than we're ever going to get in one-sided reports of a private conversation."

Well quite . Agree. This is a book which surely has to be read with an eye to - is this unreliable narrator. ? So PoW sounded "giddily elated" and then related what had happened with the children the night before and it sounded "matter of fact".

I had read CS was a credible author. He may be and of course for purely commercial reasons the DM are going to serialise the crowd pleasing bits. Too many uses of bellowed / bellowing in one short excerpt , Spencer, I say with my red pen aloft . ( This excerpt may be made up of bits from further apart in the book , I realise) 😊

foxylady2 · 17/09/2026 20:41

Crikey O'Reilly Charles is gay ! That wasn't on my 2026 bingo card.

She looked up at me, nodded, and said quietly: ‘But, Carlos, my husband is in love with his valet.’
I gulped. ‘Well, I guess, in that case, you really don’t have a choice.’
She did not name the member of staff, and I never asked her who it was, or why she would believe such an improbable thing.

JustAnotherWhinger · 17/09/2026 20:45

His comment about Lord Mountbatten warning his then-equerry father off QEII because he wanted her to marry Philip doesn’t fit time wise.

He was equerry to George VI 1950-1952, then QEII 52-54.

She married Philip in 47.

Noodledog · 17/09/2026 20:45

My sisters knew that Diana had always wanted Mozart’s Requiem to be played for her, after her death. But when I passed this on, it was rejected as a possibility: ‘No part of a requiem can be played at a Church of England funeral,’ I was told.

I'm pretty certain I remember part of Verdi's requiem was played at her funeral (I remember because I love that piece of music). And also reading at the time that it had been chosen because it was one of Diana's favourite pieces of music.

foxylady2 · 17/09/2026 20:47

Lord Mountbatten was both bisexual and a paedophile and Charles closest confidante so who knows what she meant by that comment.

foxylady2 · 17/09/2026 20:51

I have to say, I find these revelations from Earl Spencer genuinely shocking.

Whatever one thinks of Charles, Diana or the bitter history between them, reading an account from Diana's own brother of those days and of what she had told him about her marriage is deeply disturbing.

The suggestion that Charles was not in love with Diana when they married, Diana's belief that his heart was elsewhere, and particularly her extraordinary statement that her husband was “in love with his valet”, are revelations that I would never have expected to see put into print in this way.

But perhaps most upsetting is Spencer's account of Charles's reaction to Diana's death and the alleged words he later used about her: “We'll forget her soon enough.”

These are, of course, Spencer's recollections and accounts of what Diana told him, and they should be treated as such. They don't prove every interpretation that will inevitably be placed upon them.

Nevertheless, I find the whole thing profoundly sad. Whatever had happened between Charles and Diana by then, she was the mother of his two sons and had died in extraordinarily tragic circumstances.

After everything that has been written about the Royal Family over the past thirty years, I genuinely thought there was little left that could shock me about the Charles and Diana story.

I was wrong.

Noodledog · 17/09/2026 20:55

foxylady2 · 17/09/2026 20:51

I have to say, I find these revelations from Earl Spencer genuinely shocking.

Whatever one thinks of Charles, Diana or the bitter history between them, reading an account from Diana's own brother of those days and of what she had told him about her marriage is deeply disturbing.

The suggestion that Charles was not in love with Diana when they married, Diana's belief that his heart was elsewhere, and particularly her extraordinary statement that her husband was “in love with his valet”, are revelations that I would never have expected to see put into print in this way.

But perhaps most upsetting is Spencer's account of Charles's reaction to Diana's death and the alleged words he later used about her: “We'll forget her soon enough.”

These are, of course, Spencer's recollections and accounts of what Diana told him, and they should be treated as such. They don't prove every interpretation that will inevitably be placed upon them.

Nevertheless, I find the whole thing profoundly sad. Whatever had happened between Charles and Diana by then, she was the mother of his two sons and had died in extraordinarily tragic circumstances.

After everything that has been written about the Royal Family over the past thirty years, I genuinely thought there was little left that could shock me about the Charles and Diana story.

I was wrong.

It would be interesting to be able to read an account written by Diana about her brother and his behaviour towards her, and I think it would be much more illuminating than this.

Puzzledandpissedoff · 17/09/2026 21:02

foxylady2 · 17/09/2026 20:47

Lord Mountbatten was both bisexual and a paedophile and Charles closest confidante so who knows what she meant by that comment.

I could well be wrong, but took it as a reference to George Smith's allegation that he witnessed a member of the RF engaged in a sex act with staff

Obviously the institution trashed him, and it might have rested there had Michael Peat not made it clear in his ridiculous statement that the royal referred to was Charles, and since this was at the time when Michael Fawcett was seeking an injunction, people put two and two together - possibly incorrectly

Of course George Smith is also now dead, but it was his words on tape which Diana was said to possess, the whereabouts of which aren't known

foxylady2 · 17/09/2026 21:05

Puzzledandpissedoff · 17/09/2026 21:02

I could well be wrong, but took it as a reference to George Smith's allegation that he witnessed a member of the RF engaged in a sex act with staff

Obviously the institution trashed him, and it might have rested there had Michael Peat not made it clear in his ridiculous statement that the royal referred to was Charles, and since this was at the time when Michael Fawcett was seeking an injunction, people put two and two together - possibly incorrectly

Of course George Smith is also now dead, but it was his words on tape which Diana was said to possess, the whereabouts of which aren't known

I has to look this up but Spencer is obviously raking this rumour up with an insider’s eye.

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2004/jun/14/pressandpublishing.themonarchy1

The tortured tale of George Smith, the former royal valet who claimed to have seen Prince Charles engaged in a sexual act, took a new twist yesterday when a Sunday newspaper induced him to temporarily retract the story in the hope of receiving money to pay off his debts.
Mr Smith, a former corporal in the Welsh Guards, and the prince's valet for nine years until being dismissed in 1997, has been relating various claims for several years and last year sold his story to the Mail on Sunday which, it emerged yesterday, paid him £61,000.
His story, that he was raped by another royal servant in 1989 and that he witnessed Prince Charles in a sexual incident, has never been verified.

Royal valet caught in sting backtracks on his retraction

The tale of George Smith, the former royal valet who claimed to have seen Prince Charles engaged in a sexual act, took a new twist yesterday when a Sunday newspaper induced him to temporarily retract the story. By Stephen Bates.

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2004/jun/14/pressandpublishing.themonarchy1

Lalgarh · 17/09/2026 21:08

Someone call Andrew Lownie!

OneLilacHedgehog · 17/09/2026 21:08

Puzzledandpissedoff · 17/09/2026 21:02

I could well be wrong, but took it as a reference to George Smith's allegation that he witnessed a member of the RF engaged in a sex act with staff

Obviously the institution trashed him, and it might have rested there had Michael Peat not made it clear in his ridiculous statement that the royal referred to was Charles, and since this was at the time when Michael Fawcett was seeking an injunction, people put two and two together - possibly incorrectly

Of course George Smith is also now dead, but it was his words on tape which Diana was said to possess, the whereabouts of which aren't known

Yes it was widely said in the press it was Charles.
Although until Charles was mentioned, people assumed it was Edward.

I don't really care if this accusation is true or not. It does appear from other rich aristos that same sex sex is not 7ncommon, even if they partner with the opposite sex.