Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Can we allow Harry and Meghan a clean sheet

337 replies

Noras · 20/08/2026 12:21

Just that really.

When they come back should we just judge them by their future behaviour, not the past and try to be positive.

After the events of the last few days with Jason Arday it might help the RF if the media and social media allowed them to get on with things in a positive way. Frankly the only person who should be aggrieved is the Princess of Wales and maybe the King but he clearly want peace now what with his illness.

Let’s see if they can be positive and an asset to the UK and the RF.

OP posts:
sunflowersintheday · 20/08/2026 15:00

BoredZelda · 20/08/2026 14:59

They did not actually say that. Have you looked it up?

Find me the response from Meghan that said “they were not going to be given titles because of the colour of their skin”.

You need to watch the interview. However, if you think they're above reproach there's really nothing more to say.
Would you like to buy a bridge?.

BunnyBunbunbun · 20/08/2026 15:01

Noras · 20/08/2026 12:21

Just that really.

When they come back should we just judge them by their future behaviour, not the past and try to be positive.

After the events of the last few days with Jason Arday it might help the RF if the media and social media allowed them to get on with things in a positive way. Frankly the only person who should be aggrieved is the Princess of Wales and maybe the King but he clearly want peace now what with his illness.

Let’s see if they can be positive and an asset to the UK and the RF.

A clean sheet regarding what? They are two private citizens. They are related to the royal family, but they have nothing to do with the work of the royal family or the King. They will not be working royals, as in they will have no role in representing the British head of state or the British state. I'm sure they will try to present themselves as quasi-royals in some kind of rival court, scraping odd jobs through their "office of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex" and that squiggly crown symbol they use without permission from the Crown, but they are nothing to do with the institutions of the United Kingdom and will never again have anything to do with them. They can therefore not be considered an asset to the royal family or the United Kingdom because whatever they plan to do has absolutely nothing to do with the royal family or the British state.

It's not clear to me what things you expect them to be getting on with.

sunflowersintheday · 20/08/2026 15:01

AuntieBiotics · 20/08/2026 14:59

She also said that the Archbishop of Canterbury married them in their back garden.

She glossed over the fact that great grandchildren of the monarch were not given "prince" titles in any situation and that was nothing to do with skin colour. Charles became king and ta-da, the titles are granted.

She said the palace took her passport away yet still managed plenty of international travel.

He said in Spare that he was at school when the queen mother died when there are pictures of him skiing in Switzerland with his dad and brother the say before.

Some people just won't believe that they lied.

BoredZelda · 20/08/2026 15:01

sunflowersintheday · 20/08/2026 14:57

It's frankly bizarre that you make such strange judgements about me personally.
You don't know me.
Practise what you preach.

I made no judgment. Simply stated an opinion of an action.

HumberSquid · 20/08/2026 15:02

JudgeJ · 20/08/2026 13:34

If Charles dies in the next 5 years then the heir to the throne will be a minor, Prince George, and maybe Harry sees himself as the senior advisor to George as he will be the next adult in the line of succession. These two never do anything for no reason and once they're here William would find it more difficult to remove him from the l of s .

??? When King Charles dies, William will be King and I'm sure he'll be able to give George any advice he requires. What makes you think Harry would or wants to be involved?

As for the line of succession, why would he be removed? The Royal line is littered with rapists and murderers, many of whom become king, and I've never heard of Harry being accused of a crime. Dear old Andrew is still sitting pretty.

sunflowersintheday · 20/08/2026 15:03

BoredZelda · 20/08/2026 15:01

I made no judgment. Simply stated an opinion of an action.

Well it seems you won't allow others a similar privilege.

desperatemum1234 · 20/08/2026 15:04

Abso-fucking-lutely not. They are awful people.

SummerNocturnal · 20/08/2026 15:06

Clean sheet from me.
If only to see Piers Morgan combust.

They won't get it though.
They'll be hounded.
Why?
Take MN. We have had five fevered threads on them.
They are click bait.
Press know that hence the continued coverage.
I feel sorry for them.
I did back then and I still do.
I wish them 🍀. They are going to need it.

Little public support. Vitriol from many quarters.
Reverse culture shock.
Rapprochement for a prodigal son will not necessarily be forthcoming.
They will soon find who their real remaining friends are.
Estrangement and family feuds are painful and hard to get over. I do not judge. Two things can be true at once and hurt people hurt people. Adverse childhood experiences are real. Trauma can be intergenerational.
Nothing is black/white and anyone who cannot see both sides haven't read enough into it or been through it themselves.

I wish them well because it is going to be hard and time doesn't heal. As a pp has pointed out, they'll be damned no matter what they do and the press are unlikely to take a neutral stance - the public gets what the public wants and much of the time, that's a pitchfork or a conspiracy theory.

BunnyBunbunbun · 20/08/2026 15:08

Rhaidimiddim · 20/08/2026 14:13

Bread and circuses was about providing entertainment to the plebs. The emperors pandered to them by providing free food and entertainment. There was a balance of power there - the emperor had to keep the mob happy, so that his political rivals couldn't turn them against him.

Which is to say, KC3 doesn't get to do what he likes, and who he is seen with now IS our business. If HAM are being backed by anti-Monarchists, they have just landed a hefty blow on the Monarchy. KC3 is now in a really tricky situation where he can be attacked for compromising his constitutional role if he is seen to be too close with H, and attacked for being a oetty, uncaring, unforgiving, unChristian father if he keeps his distance.

This is a very impassioned statement. It's also based on a serious misunderstanding. Harry and Meghan have landed nothing on the monarchy. The monarchy is not at risk because of them. They are insignificant in the broader scheme things and will be a very short section - not even a chapter - in the modern history of the British monarchy.

I'm not sure why so much ire towards the King. If he wants to see his daft son and backstabbing daughter-in-law in private, it's up to him. Why on earth do you think you can tell him what to do in his private life?

Yogabearmous · 20/08/2026 15:10

ALovelyPinkUnicorn · 20/08/2026 12:38

Do you think they would agree to retracting all the lies they told?

This.

Mylovelygreendress · 20/08/2026 15:11

I for one would love to know the real reason for them returning to the racist U.K. !
Suppose we will find out eventually.

Rhaidimiddim · 20/08/2026 15:14

BunnyBunbunbun · 20/08/2026 15:08

This is a very impassioned statement. It's also based on a serious misunderstanding. Harry and Meghan have landed nothing on the monarchy. The monarchy is not at risk because of them. They are insignificant in the broader scheme things and will be a very short section - not even a chapter - in the modern history of the British monarchy.

I'm not sure why so much ire towards the King. If he wants to see his daft son and backstabbing daughter-in-law in private, it's up to him. Why on earth do you think you can tell him what to do in his private life?

I don't think I can tell him.what to do in his private life.

I was trying to make the point that what he does in his private life relating to H will be used by the commentariat to bash him.

Baital · 20/08/2026 15:15

Mylovelygreendress · 20/08/2026 15:11

I for one would love to know the real reason for them returning to the racist U.K. !
Suppose we will find out eventually.

My guess is they have run out of money.

They will still have the income from H's trust funds, but no capital. So will very soon 'decide' to sell Montecito because the UK is now so wonderful and this is their forever home.

That will, hopefully, pay the costs of his lost court cases. They can then live off the trust funds.

BunnyBunbunbun · 20/08/2026 15:19

Rhaidimiddim · 20/08/2026 15:14

I don't think I can tell him.what to do in his private life.

I was trying to make the point that what he does in his private life relating to H will be used by the commentariat to bash him.

The commentariat who bash an elderly man for meeting his daft son and innocent grandchildren in private every now and then are nincompoops and should be ignored.

Rhaidimiddim · 20/08/2026 15:27

BunnyBunbunbun · 20/08/2026 15:19

The commentariat who bash an elderly man for meeting his daft son and innocent grandchildren in private every now and then are nincompoops and should be ignored.

But they won't be. There are clicks and money in headlines about William being furious about his dad inviting H to this and that, or KC3 being mean for not inviting H to this and that.

Every year there's been the Balmoral/Sandringham will-they-won't-they which keeps the clicks coming, and many a MN thread rolling. From now on it will be that on steroids.

Somehow, KC3/ Dad managed to keep the last visit private. I hope whatever carrot or stick he wielded then is good for ongoing, unleaking relations between him and H.

ETA " unleaking"

chickenpotnoodle · 20/08/2026 15:43

No - I think these two have just run out of options, and $$$$'s

Hope they stay away from the press and she stops merching from being 'royal'
Hope the kids find happiness - not their fault who their parents are.

KittyTinker · 20/08/2026 15:50

Lampzade · 20/08/2026 14:00

Whether people like it or not , if they do come back it is because they are needed , trust me ?
The’ powers that be ‘ know that other senior royals are not up to scratch . It is really as simple as that
I hope for their sake that it is just a rumour and they don’t come back after the heinous way they were treated
Archie and Lillibet would be better off in the US

I never trust anyone who says “trust me”.

Mistyglade · 20/08/2026 15:50

Personally I’ve been wondering whether Harry has pushed her into submission because he is so unhappy. I wouldn’t be at all surprised if they aren’t separated ahead of a divorce within the decade if not sooner. He wants to be at home and her clawing her way to the top through her extraordinary skill for social hustling has reached its zenith.

Good luck with the clean sheet and conservative media coverage.

Heyhelga · 20/08/2026 15:52

I think how they are or are not integrated into the royal family will set the tone for how the media and general public will accept them back in the UK.

LipglossAndLies · 20/08/2026 15:55

Even if Harry and Meghan completely stepped out of the spotlight tomorrow, people who are parasocially invested in them would not stop talking.

A good example is when Meghan wasn't seen or posting anything recently for several weeks, people didn't stop speculating and gossiping about her.

Noras · 20/08/2026 16:01

CariadDarling · 20/08/2026 13:37

I can’t believe you actually mentioned Jason Arday in this. Yes he was Autistic. But he was also another fantasist, perhaps even a liar in the real sense also. Was he hounded to his death ? No. He was unwell and I sadly suspect his death would always have been down to suicide.

in not making the argument but many are that eg was hounded by the press and Meghan’s camp have argued the same.

I am neutral - just asking a question

OP posts:
Theunamedcat · 20/08/2026 16:02

Somethings once said cannot be unsaid

she was celebrated welcomed more than catherine was she was NOT hounded by the press like diana camilla and catherine no matter what they claim They never stopped her from working she wasnt chased in the streets upskirted, photos taken of her topless yes the British press said things and some people lost jobs (quite rightly so) but the intensity the frenzy wasnt there they have been quite rightly criticised for their own actions even recently short trip to the UK has been filled with leaks moans and groans for an essentially damp squib of a visit no one camped out by the kings house with a long lens to get photos nothing just a whole load of will she come wont she and she doesn't feel safe yadda yadda press intrusive yadda yadda security SECURITY fucking nonsense honestly its pathetic I don't want to hear about her/his complaints again they literally said Portugal was where kids could be kids so why here why flipping now

Theunamedcat · 20/08/2026 16:03

Noras · 20/08/2026 16:01

in not making the argument but many are that eg was hounded by the press and Meghan’s camp have argued the same.

I am neutral - just asking a question

She wasn't hounded diana was hounded catherine was hounded even camilla was hounded meghan was not

MrsFinkelstein · 20/08/2026 16:03

Lampzade · 20/08/2026 14:00

Whether people like it or not , if they do come back it is because they are needed , trust me ?
The’ powers that be ‘ know that other senior royals are not up to scratch . It is really as simple as that
I hope for their sake that it is just a rumour and they don’t come back after the heinous way they were treated
Archie and Lillibet would be better off in the US

Sure, Jan.

They've decided to return to the UK. Them.

Can you point to where they were invited back?
BP have clearly stated this is a personal decision and there will be no change to their status (as non working Royals).

Lovely to see you once again bringing the worst of the SS Reddit rumours over here.