Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Can we allow Harry and Meghan a clean sheet

337 replies

Noras · 20/08/2026 12:21

Just that really.

When they come back should we just judge them by their future behaviour, not the past and try to be positive.

After the events of the last few days with Jason Arday it might help the RF if the media and social media allowed them to get on with things in a positive way. Frankly the only person who should be aggrieved is the Princess of Wales and maybe the King but he clearly want peace now what with his illness.

Let’s see if they can be positive and an asset to the UK and the RF.

OP posts:
irfgy · 22/08/2026 15:22

sunflowersintheday · 22/08/2026 15:05

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/the-royal-wedding-how-the-uks-newspapers-reacted-to-meghan-markle-and-prince-harrys-nuptials-a3843861.html
Such a positive response, wasn't there?
I remember what a lovely, happy day it was. The crowds turned out to cheer them! A really lovely occasion

that both H and M dismissed as a spectacle for the world.

sunflowersintheday · 22/08/2026 15:27

irfgy · 22/08/2026 15:22

that both H and M dismissed as a spectacle for the world.

They did, I'd forgotten that. Plus the real wedding was three days earlier?

Rhaidimiddim · 22/08/2026 22:04

Laughpuddles · 21/08/2026 23:29

So many haters from mumsnet. So sad
😞

Oh, the scoldings have started!

Rhaidimiddim · 22/08/2026 22:08

BoredZelda · 22/08/2026 14:41

Have you forgotten the ridicule?

You mean M ridiculing it in the OW interview as a spectacle for the masses? No.

Rhaidimiddim · 22/08/2026 22:10

Are we still allowed to refer to pigeons these days on RF threads?

JesseDavisGonnaHangOnInThereNSoul · 22/08/2026 22:11

Rhaidimiddim · 22/08/2026 22:08

You mean M ridiculing it in the OW interview as a spectacle for the masses? No.

Didn't turn down a £32 million wedding for a registrar affair ..funnily enough.

sunflowersintheday · 22/08/2026 22:28

Rhaidimiddim · 22/08/2026 22:08

You mean M ridiculing it in the OW interview as a spectacle for the masses? No.

😂😂

ThatCyanCat · 22/08/2026 23:43

sunflowersintheday · 22/08/2026 15:27

They did, I'd forgotten that. Plus the real wedding was three days earlier?

No, that was a kind of exchange of vows that may have meant a lot to them personally/spiritually, but was not legally binding.

Backtoschooloncemore · 23/08/2026 00:35

ThatCyanCat · 22/08/2026 23:43

No, that was a kind of exchange of vows that may have meant a lot to them personally/spiritually, but was not legally binding.

That is not what they said though.

ThatCyanCat · 23/08/2026 07:05

Backtoschooloncemore · 23/08/2026 00:35

That is not what they said though.

No, but it's what happened. If memory serves, the Archbishop of Canterbury confirmed it because otherwise it would have been illegal for him to sign a marriage certificate that he knew was false.

I liked them both initially, very much. I do remember thinking it was so crass and rude for her to be so sneery about the wedding, essentially insulting everyone who watched it because they felt so much goodwill and pleasure for the couple, and then so fucking stupid to say they had already got married when they hadn't. Yes of course it's a "spectacle". You're marrying a prince! This stupid interview you're doing is also a spectacle!

sunflowersintheday · 23/08/2026 07:18

ThatCyanCat · 23/08/2026 07:05

No, but it's what happened. If memory serves, the Archbishop of Canterbury confirmed it because otherwise it would have been illegal for him to sign a marriage certificate that he knew was false.

I liked them both initially, very much. I do remember thinking it was so crass and rude for her to be so sneery about the wedding, essentially insulting everyone who watched it because they felt so much goodwill and pleasure for the couple, and then so fucking stupid to say they had already got married when they hadn't. Yes of course it's a "spectacle". You're marrying a prince! This stupid interview you're doing is also a spectacle!

Absolutely. It was an incredible day, I absolutely loved it, and the crowds came out in force to cheer and wave, it was such a happy occasion. .
Meghan was very sneery about it, you are right, and I thought that was very arrogant, rude and unpleasant. They could have had any wedding they wanted, a low key one would have been fine.
In Spare, Harry said she wanted either Westminster Abbey or St Paul's Cathedral. So, a lot of contradiction going on there.

Viviennemary · 23/08/2026 08:08

sunflowersintheday · 23/08/2026 07:18

Absolutely. It was an incredible day, I absolutely loved it, and the crowds came out in force to cheer and wave, it was such a happy occasion. .
Meghan was very sneery about it, you are right, and I thought that was very arrogant, rude and unpleasant. They could have had any wedding they wanted, a low key one would have been fine.
In Spare, Harry said she wanted either Westminster Abbey or St Paul's Cathedral. So, a lot of contradiction going on there.

Edited

SHe moaned about the musty smell in the church. Sneered at the £30m wedding and said the it wasn't even her real wedding anyway and they actually got married the day before in a private ceremony. Was rude to the Queen's dresser. Was horrible to Kate and binned her flowers.

I think it would be a mistake to move on and say everything is fine. It's not fine. Why cant she forgive her father and move on. And he did nothing compared to the upset she's caused.

ThatCyanCat · 23/08/2026 08:23

I remember also feeling irrationally irritated that they had supposedly had this little private ceremony so they could have a small, intimate thing that was just them - but it was so important to her that everyone knew about it! "We didn't want this big spectacle, so let me tell Oprah Winfrey in an interview watched by millions all about the tiny private thing so everyone knows how private we are!"

Reminds me of being at school when teachers would say they needed children to be quiet so we'd all start shouting, "I'M QUIET!"

sunflowersintheday · 23/08/2026 08:25

ThatCyanCat · 23/08/2026 08:23

I remember also feeling irrationally irritated that they had supposedly had this little private ceremony so they could have a small, intimate thing that was just them - but it was so important to her that everyone knew about it! "We didn't want this big spectacle, so let me tell Oprah Winfrey in an interview watched by millions all about the tiny private thing so everyone knows how private we are!"

Reminds me of being at school when teachers would say they needed children to be quiet so we'd all start shouting, "I'M QUIET!"

😂😂
Very true! As we know, if they wanted a quiet, low key wedding, that's what they could have had.

Mylovelygreendress · 23/08/2026 08:55

Viviennemary · 23/08/2026 08:08

SHe moaned about the musty smell in the church. Sneered at the £30m wedding and said the it wasn't even her real wedding anyway and they actually got married the day before in a private ceremony. Was rude to the Queen's dresser. Was horrible to Kate and binned her flowers.

I think it would be a mistake to move on and say everything is fine. It's not fine. Why cant she forgive her father and move on. And he did nothing compared to the upset she's caused.

Her father isn’t a billionaire or even a millionaire PLUS who knows what he might let slip if he ever meets Harry ??

MrsFinkelstein · 23/08/2026 09:54

Rhaidimiddim · 22/08/2026 22:10

Are we still allowed to refer to pigeons these days on RF threads?

Not sure, but there's definitely a blizzard of feathers and chess pieces right now.

Viviennemary · 23/08/2026 10:49

Backtoschooloncemore · 23/08/2026 00:35

That is not what they said though.

No it's not. But wise Queen Elizabeth said 'recollections may vary' about a few things. In other words somebody lied. No prizes for guessing who.

Baital · 23/08/2026 11:11

ThatCyanCat · 23/08/2026 08:23

I remember also feeling irrationally irritated that they had supposedly had this little private ceremony so they could have a small, intimate thing that was just them - but it was so important to her that everyone knew about it! "We didn't want this big spectacle, so let me tell Oprah Winfrey in an interview watched by millions all about the tiny private thing so everyone knows how private we are!"

Reminds me of being at school when teachers would say they needed children to be quiet so we'd all start shouting, "I'M QUIET!"

Many decades ago I worked in a day centre for adults with learning disabilities. One service user would come into the busy canteen and say, very loudly "stop looking at me, everyone!"

Whereupon, of course, everyone would turn and look at her 😀

I get similar vibes from some of H&M's announcements 😂

LifeIsTooShort247 · 23/08/2026 11:39

👀6 years later....same rehashing of comments....

Bill Murray Well Its Groundhog Day Again GIF
SaraHoliday · 23/08/2026 11:50

Noras · 20/08/2026 12:21

Just that really.

When they come back should we just judge them by their future behaviour, not the past and try to be positive.

After the events of the last few days with Jason Arday it might help the RF if the media and social media allowed them to get on with things in a positive way. Frankly the only person who should be aggrieved is the Princess of Wales and maybe the King but he clearly want peace now what with his illness.

Let’s see if they can be positive and an asset to the UK and the RF.

Hmmmmmm....

If they 'blend in' and live the 'normal' life they said they so much wanted - yes.

If they expect to be treated like a celebrity with an entourage of security not funded by themselves - no.

I find a lot of what Harry and Meghan say, does not match their actions.

Time will tell!

HumptyDump · 23/08/2026 11:52

No

Backtoschooloncemore · 23/08/2026 12:15

SaraHoliday · 23/08/2026 11:50

Hmmmmmm....

If they 'blend in' and live the 'normal' life they said they so much wanted - yes.

If they expect to be treated like a celebrity with an entourage of security not funded by themselves - no.

I find a lot of what Harry and Meghan say, does not match their actions.

Time will tell!

‘Celebrity’ is the only source of income. They could live off their current assets but income from a few tens of millions doesn’t really buy you a private jet lifestyle these days. They would have to downgrade to first class or even maybe slum it in business class.

upinaballoon · 23/08/2026 12:19

ThatCyanCat · 22/08/2026 23:43

No, that was a kind of exchange of vows that may have meant a lot to them personally/spiritually, but was not legally binding.

The usual practice run for couples who are going to be married in the C of E, as long as there are enough vicars around, but I have known churchwardens run through the service with couples.
Of course it might have meant a lot to her, but it was smaltzy tosh for the American market, a huge piece of rudeness to the Archbishop of Canterbury and an insult to the many people in the UK, who, at that point, wished them both very well. No, I know, not all, but many, many of us.

OliveMyLove · 23/08/2026 14:07

It was an odd choice to describe the wedding this way in an interview sure to go global. I can see saying it to a friend. But they chose or perhaps even demanded the spectacle then mocked it.

When people demand know why they are disliked it baffles that they don’t see how off-putting and obnoxious they’ve been. They aren’t special, anyone speaking this way would end up offending many people.

Look at Timothée Chalamet’s recent debacle pitting the movies against ballet and opera. He lost public respect with just one little thoughtless remark and those offended will see it as a character defining moment.

Last night my aged father told me he couldn’t stand Frank Sinatra. He doesn’t remember exactly why but said he thought too much of himself.

sunflowersintheday · 23/08/2026 14:39

No reflection. No thinking; "hang on, the taxpayer has subsidised this, people have come out to cheer and wave and wish us well, how touching, how lovely".
Nope. No appreciation whatsoever.
Just entitlement and greed.

Swipe left for the next trending thread