Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

PR disasters thread 24

563 replies

BigWillyLittleTodger · 15/07/2026 16:04

What more summer shenanigans await us from the Montecito duo?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
15
Bredaa · Yesterday 12:35

LipglossAndLies · Yesterday 11:45

Criticising someone's action is one thing but saying you wanted more material to ridicule them sounds more like a pattern of mockery and starts to resemble the kind of behaviour you're condemning 💁‍♀️

Disagree. Holding anyone to account who has the privilege of a huge global platform with a policy agenda that they monetise for personal gain, in order to observe and comment that their words are meeting their actions is not bullying.

However impacting, persistently and consistently so many employees trying to scratch a living that some have had to resort to professional help to alleviate the mental injury inflicted is bullying as reported by many witnesses and victims.

Being entertained at the absurd pantomime of content served up almost daily from the delusional fools is pure comedy gold. I actually can’t believe they do this for free and at the same time inadvertently directly line the pockets of the press they hate and are also unable to generate a revenue stream for themselves with the PR they generate. You couldn’t make it up.

BasiliskStare · Yesterday 12:43

@Bubblesgun
Meghan ( amongst others ) advertises clothes she wears on an application called OneOff. I believe the model is that the platform and she share a % of the sales. Times she has done this include the dress she wore to the hospital visit in Australia and the outfit she wore to Bondi beach.

Bubblesgun · Yesterday 12:46

BasiliskStare · Yesterday 12:43

@Bubblesgun
Meghan ( amongst others ) advertises clothes she wears on an application called OneOff. I believe the model is that the platform and she share a % of the sales. Times she has done this include the dress she wore to the hospital visit in Australia and the outfit she wore to Bondi beach.

It includes the one she wore at the children hospital 😱 i find that very shocking. Am I alone in thinking that.
i mean they gone low since they left the RF but i couldnt imagine there was an even lower level
of low.

i really detest what those 2 represent. They have no values

AnAutumnCrow · Yesterday 13:06

This is an interesting point. Was WLM really designed to be a ‘Daytime’ show? With its crew of 80 professionals and ‘magical’ guests and Prince Harry’s cameo and the Duchess of Sussex at the helm?

I thought at the time it was being marketed very firmly as being ‘Primetime’. A big deal. Something special. An 8pm ‘must watch’.

Now it’s in the same bracket as doggie peg legs and cleaning your patio slabs?

I think @Bredaa is right that this is Netflix trying to scrape some RoI via publicity, but I doubt it’s going to make Meghan happy to have her work downgraded so publicly. It’s basically another (inevitable) humiliation, even if it wins.

HoldMyWine · Yesterday 13:12

I just looked at the One Off instagram account, it only has 20k followers. Hardly a big money spinner.

BigWillyLittleTodger · Yesterday 13:21

Bubblesgun · Yesterday 12:46

It includes the one she wore at the children hospital 😱 i find that very shocking. Am I alone in thinking that.
i mean they gone low since they left the RF but i couldnt imagine there was an even lower level
of low.

i really detest what those 2 represent. They have no values

No you are very much not alone in thinking that

Meghan Markle made the navy Karen Gee "Priscilla" dress she wore to the Royal Children's Hospital in Melbourne shoppable on the AI-powered fashion platform OneOff.

  • The Partnership: Meghan is an investor and participant in oneoff where she features personal edits of her public looks.
  • The Outfit: The $1,250 Australian-designed dress from her April 14 trip was uploaded to the platform alongside shopping links.
  • The Backlash: The move drew criticism from commentators who viewed commercializing her tour outfits immediately after public charity visits as tone-deaf.
OP posts:
Lunde · Yesterday 13:24

Bubblesgun · Yesterday 12:28

@BigWillyLittleTodger i had posted a question on the last thread which got no answer so posting here.

is true that MM uses an app that allows her and other celebs to post their outfits they wore at events, the app then have clickable links
for the public to buy the outfits. Then 20% is divided between the celeb and the app.

if thats true, apparently MM uses it and keeps thr money she wore at charity events. It s her prerogative of course, but i do find it quite crass because she could give the money to the charity she was supporting that day instead of keeping it to herself.
a) it s not like she needs the money and b) it s really crass to monetise a charity event like that.

is that true? What do you all think?

i cant remember for the life of me where i read it. So cant post a link.

thank you

It is true.

There was a lot of criticism on the threads that covered the faux Aussie tour
-she merched the outfits she wore to the children's hospital - including the visit to the eating disorder clinic
-within an hour of leaving the Bondi beach massacre site visit - she had uploaded her outfit including the shirt that appeared to mimic concentration camp garments (IIRC there was a huge backlash and she took that one down)
-she also merches her kids' clothes - despite giving earnest speeches on Swiss roundabouts on the dangers of SM and keeping your children off it because of online bullying

🙄

Starryfifty · Yesterday 13:27

There are no depths the pair of them will plummet

Lunde · Yesterday 13:28

AnAutumnCrow · Yesterday 13:06

This is an interesting point. Was WLM really designed to be a ‘Daytime’ show? With its crew of 80 professionals and ‘magical’ guests and Prince Harry’s cameo and the Duchess of Sussex at the helm?

I thought at the time it was being marketed very firmly as being ‘Primetime’. A big deal. Something special. An 8pm ‘must watch’.

Now it’s in the same bracket as doggie peg legs and cleaning your patio slabs?

I think @Bredaa is right that this is Netflix trying to scrape some RoI via publicity, but I doubt it’s going to make Meghan happy to have her work downgraded so publicly. It’s basically another (inevitable) humiliation, even if it wins.

I think you are right - it was marketed as a Prime Time evening show

Being put in the Day Time category is a serious downgrade of her aspirations - the sort of lightweight programme to be slotted in between Lorraine, Loose Women and Cash in the Attic etc

binkie163 · Yesterday 13:36

Not sure if I read it on here or a news article. The award she has been entered into is not just for filler daytime TV but sponsored by Purina dog food...... brilliant.
Maybe they will market her dog biscuits 😂
If this is wrong I apologise but it gave me a huge chuckle.

Puzzledandpissedoff · Yesterday 13:41

Just popping on to say someone's sent me a PM, but for whatever reason I can no longer open the file so don't even know who it's from Sad

It's been like this for me for a while - have asked HQ but no response - and I didn't want to appear rude to whoever sent this so just thought I'd mention it

Lunde · Yesterday 13:41

binkie163 · Yesterday 13:36

Not sure if I read it on here or a news article. The award she has been entered into is not just for filler daytime TV but sponsored by Purina dog food...... brilliant.
Maybe they will market her dog biscuits 😂
If this is wrong I apologise but it gave me a huge chuckle.

Yes - I wrote about this earlier. Being one of the "5 finalists" alongside a dog food company produced show was not the type of aspirational, lifestyle programming she had in mind 😂😂😂It seems to suggest a dearth of quality submissions ...

I looked up the dog food show and there is a trailer on the website 😉

https://www.purina.com/a-different-breed

DaisyDooley · Yesterday 13:45

The simple fact that nobody knows if they are still here/back in California shows that they do have the ability to come and go without drama.
They create the drama themselves then complain about it.
There were no crowds to greet Harry at the events which his ‘spokesperson’ had announced well in advance he was going to. People don’t care enough anymore to turn out to see them because we all know he is not a working royal, he is not a member of the royal family he is simply a member of the Mountbatten Windsor family.
He is the past, not the present or the future and so people are not bothered.
He has no relevance in the UK anymore.

AnAutumnCrow · Yesterday 13:50

Puzzledandpissedoff · Yesterday 13:41

Just popping on to say someone's sent me a PM, but for whatever reason I can no longer open the file so don't even know who it's from Sad

It's been like this for me for a while - have asked HQ but no response - and I didn't want to appear rude to whoever sent this so just thought I'd mention it

The whole PM system is a shambles on MN, so I never use it. It might possibly be usable if you open the desktop version of MN on a massive PC monitor??

BemusedAmerican · Yesterday 13:52

GoldThumb · Yesterday 10:22

I feel like I need to watch wizard of paws now!

Me too. Talk about someone who is changing lives for the better! Helping an animal lead a happier life versus broccoli holiday wreaths. No contest at all.

Puzzledandpissedoff · Yesterday 13:57

AnAutumnCrow · Yesterday 13:50

The whole PM system is a shambles on MN, so I never use it. It might possibly be usable if you open the desktop version of MN on a massive PC monitor??

I'm on a desktop, AnAutumnCrow, or rather a laptop with a large screen, and it still doesn't work Sad

Glad to hear it's not just me though ...

BemusedAmerican · Yesterday 14:01

I just watched the "A Different Breed" trailer and that also looks great. All my cats have eaten Purina cat food and have lived to their late teens. We are a Purina household. I'm going to watch the two animal movies.

Bredaa · Yesterday 14:07

Lunde · Yesterday 13:28

I think you are right - it was marketed as a Prime Time evening show

Being put in the Day Time category is a serious downgrade of her aspirations - the sort of lightweight programme to be slotted in between Lorraine, Loose Women and Cash in the Attic etc

Edited

Interesting do we know what time or the day it was broadcast?

Is she being duplicitous, fraudulent and duplicitous again if it was broadcast in the evening?

AnAutumnCrow · Yesterday 14:10

Bredaa · Yesterday 14:07

Interesting do we know what time or the day it was broadcast?

Is she being duplicitous, fraudulent and duplicitous again if it was broadcast in the evening?

There’s some threads on this board from back then that might be illuminating to look back on? @Atlasvue was very brave and watched the whole lot. She also gave an astute analysis which was extremely entertaining!

binkie163 · Yesterday 14:12

Lunde · Yesterday 13:41

Yes - I wrote about this earlier. Being one of the "5 finalists" alongside a dog food company produced show was not the type of aspirational, lifestyle programming she had in mind 😂😂😂It seems to suggest a dearth of quality submissions ...

I looked up the dog food show and there is a trailer on the website 😉

https://www.purina.com/a-different-breed

Thanks 😀 I definitely get information overload

Bredaa · Yesterday 14:14

binkie163 · Yesterday 13:36

Not sure if I read it on here or a news article. The award she has been entered into is not just for filler daytime TV but sponsored by Purina dog food...... brilliant.
Maybe they will market her dog biscuits 😂
If this is wrong I apologise but it gave me a huge chuckle.

She missed a trick here - she could have partnered with a Guinea pig foraging food company (which is what her flower sprinkles actually are) - she would shift all that stock that’s rotting away on her shelves.

MyDogClive · Yesterday 14:16

But do the dogs eat flower sprinkles?

Rhaidimiddim · Yesterday 14:23

MyDogClive · Yesterday 14:16

But do the dogs eat flower sprinkles?

If another dog has wee-ed on them first, probably

LipglossAndLies · Yesterday 14:28

Aprilfountain · Yesterday 12:07

It's really not - I'm a news junkie so I like to check out the newspapers each day and if Ham are doing anything at all, they make very sure that they get the maximum publicity they possibly can!

I just find it strange because with digital news there are so mnay ways to still be a news junkie and filter what you see, customise your feeds, mute topics, choose the sources you follow or just scroll past.

Are you saying as a news junkie you are wanting to reading every article of every newspaper you look at?

AnAutumnCrow · Yesterday 14:37

Please don’t feed the pigeons. Not even left over flower sprinkles. They may be out of date.

Swipe left for the next trending thread