You can see the live traffic data in action as stories slip down the MailOnline pages. Harry doesn’t seem to have much sticking power, which I suppose suggests he generates less traffic than some of the others, especially if the story is positive.
So the main royal story at the moment is the Waleses at Wimbledon. Then comes one about C’s Wimbledon outfits, and one about Samuel Chatto (30th in LoS) getting engaged. Then comes the first one that mentions Harry, but it’s not particularly positive, just the inside take on how the Highgrove trip was handled, sneaking them in etc.
Then before the next H+M mention we have Beatrice and her DH wanting to keep ties with William, then where do socialites go on hols, then William leading the celebrations after the Norway win.
Then at last Meghan pops up, but alas not in a good way, the article is about how she is just as bad as Blake Lively. It’s next to one about the recent victory for free speech, which has a photo of Harry looking glum. The first positive story, which has the video of him humping Alison H, comes after one about how Harry could learn a thing or two from Edward’s approach to things, and one about the Duke of Rutland’s daughter having her suitcase stolen on a train. It does look like he is less interesting to Mail readers than the Duke of Rutland’s daughter’s suitcase, which is not a particularly good return for a supposedly triumphant few days. Stories about Harry do tend to slither down the page pretty rapidly I think.
edited for sense