Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

PR Disasters thread 20

661 replies

OctopusFriend · 02/07/2026 20:13

More to chat about

OP posts:
Thread gallery
18
Starryfifty · Yesterday 19:39

If it's so dangerous, stay at home. Do a video tribute or whatever. Seriously what an absolute farce

sickofsixseven · Yesterday 19:41

Does he think that constantly treating the British people with complete disdain and painting the entire country as full of murderous racists is going to endear himself to the people?

Passingthrough123 · Yesterday 19:42

Thedom · Yesterday 19:34

There are millions of people living very safely in London, I lived there, happily and safely, for many years with my family. There are millions of visitors who come every year safely.

I, like many other parents, am (proudly) sending my 18yo to University in London, very far from home.

Thousands of high profile celebs, ,including Royals, walk around London streets safely every year.

But here is Harry, trying to make out London is a terrorist hotbed. How disloyal can one person be to their home country. Harry has to be the most out of touch Royal Family member since his uncle Andrew.

Another Londoner here who agrees wholeheartedly. Millions of us walk the streets safely every year. To suggest that he and his family wouldn't be safe behind the fortressed gates of Buckingham Palace is both a joke and insulting. He can stay away from the capital and keep staying away as far as I'm concerned.

OctopusFriend · Yesterday 19:42

Starryfifty · Yesterday 19:39

If it's so dangerous, stay at home. Do a video tribute or whatever. Seriously what an absolute farce

It's not even an event! It's "a year to go". Such nonsense.

OP posts:
OctopusFriend · Yesterday 19:43

Passingthrough123 · Yesterday 19:42

Another Londoner here who agrees wholeheartedly. Millions of us walk the streets safely every year. To suggest that he and his family wouldn't be safe behind the fortressed gates of Buckingham Palace is both a joke and insulting. He can stay away from the capital and keep staying away as far as I'm concerned.

His aunts, uncles and cousins use the tube and cycle through London all the time! Totally ridiculous.

OP posts:
OctopusFriend · Yesterday 19:46

Passingthrough123 · Yesterday 19:26

Someone's just suggested BLT on the People.com story that this could be a diversionary ruse and that MM and the kids will fly directly to Sandringham now from Sir Elton's gaff in Nice, which everyone knows is where they really are to see the King, Harry will join them, then the kids will stay there while she hotfoots it briefly to Birmingham on Friday. Nice idea in theory, and would solve a lot of issues but a) I just can't see Queen Cam saying yes to babysitting all week and b) no way could MM set foot in the UK early and not tell everyone.

Edited

Also, the King isn't at Sandringham, he's at Holyrood and on his way to Balmoral.

OP posts:
Passingthrough123 · Yesterday 19:46

OctopusFriend · Yesterday 19:42

It's not even an event! It's "a year to go". Such nonsense.

Oh gawd, we'll have to go through this nonsense all over again in a year's time!

Starryfifty · Yesterday 19:46

OctopusFriend · Yesterday 19:42

It's not even an event! It's "a year to go". Such nonsense.

Oh fuck. 2027 😨

Starryfifty · Yesterday 19:48

Ingriftus have to take note of this lunacy. Get shot of him before the main event. Alternatively, cancel the whole thing

thenightsky · Yesterday 19:50

Starryfifty · Yesterday 19:48

Ingriftus have to take note of this lunacy. Get shot of him before the main event. Alternatively, cancel the whole thing

Yup. If they move now, they can get shut of him before July 2027.

OctopusFriend · Yesterday 19:50

Passingthrough123 · Yesterday 19:46

Oh gawd, we'll have to go through this nonsense all over again in a year's time!

Yes indeed...

OP posts:
OctopusFriend · Yesterday 19:50

Passingthrough123 · Yesterday 19:46

Oh gawd, we'll have to go through this nonsense all over again in a year's time!

Yes indeed...

OP posts:
Mylovelygreendress · Yesterday 19:51

Starryfifty · Yesterday 19:46

Oh fuck. 2027 😨

QC is 80 next July so I suppose we will have to go through the will they/ won’t they attend the party / dinner/ gala/ thanksgiving service or whatever else is planned .
Then in 2028 KC turns 80 …..

Ohpleeeease · Yesterday 19:52

PullTheBricksDown · Yesterday 18:45

New blog post giving a different prediction on how all this will go. I'm not saying this is better informed than anything else, mind: I'm just interested in the stories being circulated

If Prince Harry returns to Britain with Meghan Markle and their children, he won’t be relying on local protection. Instead, sources tell Naughty But Nice he’ll arrive with what insiders are calling his own “army” of private security.

The Sussexes are expected to travel with a large close-protection team, with one insider estimating as many as 10 security officers rotating shifts to provide 24/7 coverage from the moment they land until they leave the U.K.

“This will be one of the biggest private security operations we’ve ever seen surrounding the Sussex family,” one source tells Naughty But Nice. “The team will be with them every minute they’re in Britain. Nothing is being left to chance.”

There’s one crucial difference, however. Unlike the armed police officers assigned to senior working royals, Harry’s privately hired bodyguards cannot carry firearms in the U.K., creating a very different level of protection.

“Harry has never stopped believing his family faces exceptional security threats,” another insider says. “He’s determined to protect Meghan and the children, regardless of the cost.”

🤔

More and more I think this is Meghan Markle’s doing. He didn’t seem to worry too much about his security on his own account, why does he now think his wife and children are at so much risk? Bringing up two young children in an atmosphere of fear and paranoia is unhealthy and irresponsible.

Puzzledandpissedoff · Yesterday 19:57

I don’t know anything about US school terms but would Archie not be at school

Obviously schools vary, @Mylovelygreendress, and I've no idea which one Archie attends, but in Santa Barbara County they generally break up towards the end of June and start again mid August, which is similar to the rest of California

TBH I'm surprised (though glad) that nobody's leaked the school he goes to. With no regard for titles I realise he'll be just another rich kid to locals, and the wealth of the area may mean nobody's bothered about journalists' pay-outs, but I'm still surprised and wonder if those who reckon he's home educated might have a point

Starryfifty · Yesterday 20:01

I think divorce will be announced before July next year

jeffgoldblum · Yesterday 20:02

Puzzledandpissedoff · Yesterday 19:20

What's to say he won't, jeff - just so long as Andrew could pause his own whining long enough to sympathise with him?

As you say Andrew's about the only family member he's not trashed, and any port in a storm and all that

Oh they would have a high old time playing victim Olympics ! , nether acknowledging that their own actions have led to this!

IcedPurple · Yesterday 20:03

Ohpleeeease · Yesterday 19:52

More and more I think this is Meghan Markle’s doing. He didn’t seem to worry too much about his security on his own account, why does he now think his wife and children are at so much risk? Bringing up two young children in an atmosphere of fear and paranoia is unhealthy and irresponsible.

If we were dealing with a rational person, I'd say that maybe he's prepared to take a risk for himself but not for his children. That's a fairly common attitude.

However, we of course are not dealing with a rational person. I agree that it's quite likely Meghan refuses to allow him to take the children to Britain and is using 'security' as an excuse. He's too dumb and too under her spell to challenge this.

And yes, soon enough the children will find out that they are the grandchildren of an actual King but never get to see him. Being told that Harry's home country is too unsafe for them is not very healthy. Neither is being told to turn their back to the camera - while all the adults are allowed to grin and preen - every time Meghan wants to update her Instagram profile.

OctopusFriend · Yesterday 20:03

Starryfifty · Yesterday 20:01

I think divorce will be announced before July next year

Someone was saying 10 years, then MM would do well under California law.

OP posts:
Ferryl · Yesterday 20:07

BasiliskStare · Yesterday 18:45

@jeffgoldblum "Chris ship has either inadvertently or purposefully revealed on “ talking royals “ ( sorry no link!) that ham received head of state level security in third world countries and the poor taxpayers of those countries would be the ones who paid!!! "

Good point.

Proper description of 3rd world countries aside for a moment Was it Columbia where the cost of HAM's trip was largely a taxpayer burden , in the hope they would give donations and the trip would garner more than it cost for the country - but as it turned out they gave about 800 quid in total . ( My figures - it may have been 8,000 I am sure I can google ) but the point is the visit cost more than it gained , and that wasn't meant to be the point.

ETA not arguing about the definition of 3rd world countries , more countries which could scant afford the expenses of H&M being there.

Edited

Was the Columbia trip the one where they donated a drum? Or, knowing what a generous pair they are, it might have been a pair of drums?

I don’t think Meghan and the dc will come, I don’t think there was ever any chance that that was on the cards. What I do think is that they are probably delighted by the furore surrounding this trip. Never in their wildest dreams could they have predicted the level of press stupidity, um I mean press interest in this visit.

I can imagine them both, sat side by side at that uncomfortable looking marble table, laptops balancing on piles of The Bench, counting how many times they get a mention.

PullTheBricksDown · Yesterday 20:09

thenightsky · Yesterday 19:50

Yup. If they move now, they can get shut of him before July 2027.

I'm still waiting for someone with their head screwed on at Birmingham council to get that 'for YOUR safety, we regret...' cancellation press release out there. Come on folks, act fast before they make another bizarre decision.

Lunde · Yesterday 20:14

IcedPurple · Yesterday 18:21

Isn't Eugenie due to give birth any day now? I doubt her whiny cousin is a priority for her right now.

This is true - perhaps this is why the Sussexes have been in Portugal (in Eugenie's house) if she is waiting to give birth in Ivy Cottage at Kensington Palace (opposite Nottingham Cottage where the Sussexes used to live)

Lifestooshort71 · Yesterday 20:15

I've never understood why anybody would work as an unarmed security guard for someone like Harry. I would not risk my life and take a bullet/knife for someone that I did not hold in the highest esteem (and probably not even then, tbh, as I'm quite fond of my life). At least if you carried a Glock you could possibly shoot first and be a hero. Just imagine sacrificing your life for Harry....doesn't bear thinking about 😱

Starryfifty · Yesterday 20:15

HAM will see this as a win though. The amount of coverage they are getting is incredible.

Puzzledandpissedoff · Yesterday 20:16

I agree that it's quite likely Meghan refuses to allow him to take the children to Britain and is using 'security' as an excuse. He's too dumb and too under her spell to challenge this

If we're talking about allowing Harry to bring the kids to the UK on his own then I agree completely, @IcedPurple
As I've said before she'd be running the potential risk of him not bringing them back

Swipe left for the next trending thread