Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Harry and Meghan offered royal accommodation

1000 replies

SparklingXmas · 20/06/2026 08:47

Will they stay at Royal Lodge? I really hope it all works out for KC and to see his grandchildren would be lovely.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c5yzlmkl7zzo

Harry is wearing a baby blue linen shirt and a black 'Invictus Australia' baseball cap. Meghan is wearing a darker blue and white striped shirt.

Harry and Meghan offered royal accommodation during UK visit

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are set to visit the UK with their children next month, for the first time since 2022.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c5yzlmkl7zzo

OP posts:
Thread gallery
25
noonames · 28/06/2026 09:36

LipglossAndLies · 28/06/2026 09:31

You can't have it both ways. You stated they "can't afford a hotel" as a fact. When I asked for evidence, you had none. Now you're calling it "conjecture." If it's conjecture, it was never a fact.

We don't know what they earned, what they spent, or whether they made or lost money on any of those deals. Projects ending isn't proof of financial failure. You also aren't privy to any other income streams like investments.

You presented speculation as fact, then backtracked when challenged. That's not evidence it's making things up to fit your narrative. Ergo lying and your words here are the evidence to prove you are one. Yet you criticise others for it.

But do you have actual PROOF that this poster isn’t privy to any other income streams like investments? Because if not, this is a lie isn’t it? Ergo, as you might say.

PoppysAunt · 28/06/2026 09:38

LipglossAndLies · 28/06/2026 09:31

You can't have it both ways. You stated they "can't afford a hotel" as a fact. When I asked for evidence, you had none. Now you're calling it "conjecture." If it's conjecture, it was never a fact.

We don't know what they earned, what they spent, or whether they made or lost money on any of those deals. Projects ending isn't proof of financial failure. You also aren't privy to any other income streams like investments.

You presented speculation as fact, then backtracked when challenged. That's not evidence it's making things up to fit your narrative. Ergo lying and your words here are the evidence to prove you are one. Yet you criticise others for it.

🤣🤣🤣
Ok! I'm sure that you always have evidence for all your points on here! 😂
I think you know absolutely what we mean about the Sussexes. Several of us have challenged your points, and pp have clarified that this isn't a court of law, so maybe just leave it!

PoppysAunt · 28/06/2026 09:40

noonames · 28/06/2026 09:36

But do you have actual PROOF that this poster isn’t privy to any other income streams like investments? Because if not, this is a lie isn’t it? Ergo, as you might say.

This is getting silly, isn't it? I think that poster knows exactly what we mean.
Perhaps a trip over to the Lazy William thread is in order. Lots of unsubstantiated claims there!

Recklessismymiddlename · 28/06/2026 09:45

It’s all conjecture. None of us know! It’s all for the drama Mick! 😁

PoppysAunt · 28/06/2026 09:50

Recklessismymiddlename · 28/06/2026 09:45

It’s all conjecture. None of us know! It’s all for the drama Mick! 😁

I know! As if anyone on any of these threads - pro or anti - has evidence that would stand up in a court of law! The William thread being a prize example!
Also, I think it's sometimes necessary to spell out when you're joking...🙄

noonames · 28/06/2026 09:54

PoppysAunt · 28/06/2026 09:40

This is getting silly, isn't it? I think that poster knows exactly what we mean.
Perhaps a trip over to the Lazy William thread is in order. Lots of unsubstantiated claims there!

The idea that anything anyone says without proof attached is a lie is certainly a wild one! I guess it includes all of Harry’s book and their many interviews. Imagine living with that poster..

Good morning!
Is it? Where’s your proof? LIE!

Recklessismymiddlename · 28/06/2026 09:56

We really need this 😁 back!

PoppysAunt · 28/06/2026 09:58

noonames · 28/06/2026 09:54

The idea that anything anyone says without proof attached is a lie is certainly a wild one! I guess it includes all of Harry’s book and their many interviews. Imagine living with that poster..

Good morning!
Is it? Where’s your proof? LIE!

🤣🤣🤣
Oh my god - going through Spare trying to find proof of some of Harry's claims! Or the Oprah interview, or Netflix etc etc....evidence you say? 🧐

Cheese55 · 28/06/2026 10:25

Mylovelygreendress · 28/06/2026 08:28

How do you know that ?
The only thing I can recall is H saying he would love to live in Africa but M would never agree to that !
Why issue the half in half out statement ?
Despite his protestations and complaints, H very much wants to be Royal . As does M . If they truly wanted out of the Royal “ prison” they would drop the titles and they certainly wouldn’t have insisted on them for their DC .

I remember an interview yonks ago, when he was in the army, and he said he doesn't like the uk v much and will probably live abroad. MM said in her doc that he said he wanted to live abroad and ge would have finished it, if she said no.

SpiritofaPanda · 28/06/2026 10:41

LipglossAndLies · 28/06/2026 09:31

You can't have it both ways. You stated they "can't afford a hotel" as a fact. When I asked for evidence, you had none. Now you're calling it "conjecture." If it's conjecture, it was never a fact.

We don't know what they earned, what they spent, or whether they made or lost money on any of those deals. Projects ending isn't proof of financial failure. You also aren't privy to any other income streams like investments.

You presented speculation as fact, then backtracked when challenged. That's not evidence it's making things up to fit your narrative. Ergo lying and your words here are the evidence to prove you are one. Yet you criticise others for it.

Are you going to challenge @Cheese55on their claims of a conversation between Harry and Megan? Do they need to provide proof or they’re lying?

Your accusations only ever go one way.

SpiritofaPanda · 28/06/2026 10:43

noonames · 28/06/2026 09:54

The idea that anything anyone says without proof attached is a lie is certainly a wild one! I guess it includes all of Harry’s book and their many interviews. Imagine living with that poster..

Good morning!
Is it? Where’s your proof? LIE!

🤣🤣🤣

jeffgoldblum · 28/06/2026 10:43

noonames · 28/06/2026 07:23

Am I getting this right - you think anything presented without proof is necessarily a lie - It’s not possible for something to be true if it’s not presented with proof?

So if I say - I am 35 years old - that’s a lie, I cannot be 35 because I am not offering any proof, I must be some other age. If I go and get my birth certificate, it then becomes true? If I say my todger had frostbite, that’s a lie unless you see what, photos? What about if I say that a courtier told me the Queen Mother had died, that must be a lie without a recording of the phone call.

Regardless of whether posters on here are offering proof, regardless of whether they have ever in their lives told a lie themselves, we know for sure that Meghan and Harry are liars. They have both lied in court for a start. How does that compare to offering an opinion on a chat forum without providing proof - both the same?

Reminds me of the time we were all told that if we told our children that Father Christmas was real , we were all liars and therefore not allowed to criticise ham for their lies!

noonames · 28/06/2026 10:48

jeffgoldblum · 28/06/2026 10:43

Reminds me of the time we were all told that if we told our children that Father Christmas was real , we were all liars and therefore not allowed to criticise ham for their lies!

Ah yes - good times! You lie about Father Christmas so you’re the liar in all this - and the hypocrite too, don’t forget 😂

jeffgoldblum · 28/06/2026 10:56

noonames · 28/06/2026 10:48

Ah yes - good times! You lie about Father Christmas so you’re the liar in all this - and the hypocrite too, don’t forget 😂

🤣

PoppysAunt · 28/06/2026 10:57

noonames · 28/06/2026 10:48

Ah yes - good times! You lie about Father Christmas so you’re the liar in all this - and the hypocrite too, don’t forget 😂

Good one! 😂

milveycrohn · 28/06/2026 11:04

@Cheese55
Andrew was effectively 'cut off' from the rest of the RF because he apparantly lied to everyone about ceasing a friendship with Epstein.
(the wave of recent emails released proved this)
Secondly, he is apparantly under investigation by the police for his role as a trade envoy, and whether he leaked confidential information. As this is still under investigation (as far as I know), it would be imprudent to maintain a relationship until the investigation is completed.

IAmATorturedPoet · 28/06/2026 11:15

jeffgoldblum · 28/06/2026 10:43

Reminds me of the time we were all told that if we told our children that Father Christmas was real , we were all liars and therefore not allowed to criticise ham for their lies!

🤣🤣
Why am I not surprised! 😂

BigWillyLittleTodger · 28/06/2026 11:16

PoppysAunt · 28/06/2026 09:40

This is getting silly, isn't it? I think that poster knows exactly what we mean.
Perhaps a trip over to the Lazy William thread is in order. Lots of unsubstantiated claims there!

They do the same on another thread a while back, something along the lines of everyone lies so you can’t accuse someone else of lying because that makes you a hypocrite, or some such nonsense, it happens when they have completely lost the argument so they have to revert to attacking posters because that’s all they have.

noonames · 28/06/2026 11:18

BigWillyLittleTodger · 28/06/2026 11:16

They do the same on another thread a while back, something along the lines of everyone lies so you can’t accuse someone else of lying because that makes you a hypocrite, or some such nonsense, it happens when they have completely lost the argument so they have to revert to attacking posters because that’s all they have.

I hope they’re ready with proof of everything they post from now on. It’ll be like shooting fish in a barrel otherwise.

Recklessismymiddlename · 28/06/2026 11:19

HoraceCope · 28/06/2026 08:42

i dont like sarah vine, what a foul article,

I’m not overly keen on her either, but her book was very illuminating. Read it for book club. It slightly changed my opinion of her, but not by much.

edit: forgot to add the Name of the book if anyone is interested
How not to be a political wife

IdaGlossop · 28/06/2026 11:19

Tom Sykes issues his Substack for free on a Sunday. I have just read it. Summary: the media received a detailed operational note on Friday about all the engagements H & M would be fulfilling whilst in the UK. It included a reference to them not having security via RAVEC. Then yesterday, the lack of security became the story, pushed by Harry. Tom Sykes' theory is that H has seen this visit all along as a way to emotionally manipulate his father into intervening with RAVEC. Now he is effectively saying: 'I cannot reconcile with my father and he can't meet his grandkids because my father won't intervene to get me and my family security.' Meanwhile, palace officials have arranged accommodation and charities have invested time in preparing. Now, they don't know whether H will be bringing M or not. All because Harry can't be told 'no'. Sykes thinks Harry is having an attack of paranoia.

Is all this plausible? I think so. If what Sykes says is correct, Harry has effectively blown up any chance of reconciliation with his father, who he has made look like a prize fool. Invictus needs to boot him out before Birmingham next year to save its reputation.

Typo

PoppysAunt · 28/06/2026 11:24

BigWillyLittleTodger · 28/06/2026 11:16

They do the same on another thread a while back, something along the lines of everyone lies so you can’t accuse someone else of lying because that makes you a hypocrite, or some such nonsense, it happens when they have completely lost the argument so they have to revert to attacking posters because that’s all they have.

Shame.

LipglossAndLies · 28/06/2026 11:25

noonames · 28/06/2026 09:36

But do you have actual PROOF that this poster isn’t privy to any other income streams like investments? Because if not, this is a lie isn’t it? Ergo, as you might say.

Well they just posted to say its conjecture so backtracked and thats pretty obvious they have shown us they don't 🤨 you would know this if you read what they wrote

BigWillyLittleTodger · 28/06/2026 11:26

Sykes thinks Harry is having an attack of paranoia.

Harry is having an attack of over inflated ego not paranoia, he’s not scared of coming to the UK, we all know that, he has really jumped the shark implying his kids won’t be safe in a royal palace, the public aren’t stupid and by saying things like that he erodes any good will he had left. The public manipulation of KC and RAVEC is repulsive, we are watching an absolute nasty spoilt brat in action.

LipglossAndLies · 28/06/2026 11:27

BigWillyLittleTodger · 28/06/2026 11:16

They do the same on another thread a while back, something along the lines of everyone lies so you can’t accuse someone else of lying because that makes you a hypocrite, or some such nonsense, it happens when they have completely lost the argument so they have to revert to attacking posters because that’s all they have.

Isn't your argument that they preach about social media harm and then post pics up. They preach about environment but then fly by private planes.

But its okay to call out that hypocrisy when its about people you don't like but anytime else its perdectly okay like lying and making things up is fine so long as your not Meghan or Harry.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.