Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Harry and Meghan's Australian jaunt -part 3 it's nearly over!

864 replies

corblimeygvnr · 17/04/2026 10:05

Continuation ....

OP posts:
Thread gallery
63
garlicandsapphires · 19/04/2026 17:08

Well, I think they’re both a pair of twats Grin but it seems like this ‘tour’ has gone okay-ish. They are remarkably resilient and will not go away any time soon. I hope they manage to reconcile with the RF, they do add some pizzaz/ interest/ controversy - and act as a bit of a foil to staid W&C.

OctopusFriend · 19/04/2026 17:11

@garlicandsapphires 😂good one!
Like they have the capacity to "reconcile"!
Also - a foil to W&C? They're certainly that, with all the drama and the wild accusations! 😂😂

Indianrollerbird · 19/04/2026 17:25

garlicandsapphires · 19/04/2026 17:08

Well, I think they’re both a pair of twats Grin but it seems like this ‘tour’ has gone okay-ish. They are remarkably resilient and will not go away any time soon. I hope they manage to reconcile with the RF, they do add some pizzaz/ interest/ controversy - and act as a bit of a foil to staid W&C.

Why do you want controversy within the royal family/our head of state?

You are confusing "staid" with duty and getting on with the job. Very Omid Scobie of you.

MonteShitshow · 19/04/2026 17:27

Mylovelygreendress · 19/04/2026 13:44

Anyone know if she told the P and G story ?

It has just dawned on me that there might be no new speeches in future, just recycled bits of old speech 😱

That washing liquid story has been rinsed to oblivion, and I think several PPs have pointed out in other threads that the letter was a joint class effort as part of a project.

Duchess and PR experts: if you’re reading, please dig out a different story or create a new one! There’s so much you could talk about that doesn’t involve self-pity.

garlicandsapphires · 19/04/2026 17:29

Indianrollerbird · 19/04/2026 17:25

Why do you want controversy within the royal family/our head of state?

You are confusing "staid" with duty and getting on with the job. Very Omid Scobie of you.

Edited

Controversy = fascinating. Case in point: this thread.

IdaGlossop · 19/04/2026 17:34

TheAutumnCrow · 18/04/2026 19:45

That's a very good letter. It encapsulates what I was thinking at the time, but I'm resident in the UK at the moment so I don't think I can complain or do an AU FoI, so I'm glad that at least one organisation on the ground is trying to get some answers.

The day before this letter was 'shared', I emailed the hospital making pretty much the same points, citing my main credential as former trustee of a children's hospital charity in the UK. It wascsad to watch as she of the children were so obviously uncomfortable.

LazyCatLtd · 19/04/2026 17:35

IdaGlossop · 19/04/2026 17:34

The day before this letter was 'shared', I emailed the hospital making pretty much the same points, citing my main credential as former trustee of a children's hospital charity in the UK. It wascsad to watch as she of the children were so obviously uncomfortable.

Did you receive a reply?

IdaGlossop · 19/04/2026 17:35

LazyCatLtd · 19/04/2026 17:35

Did you receive a reply?

No. If I do, I'll report back.

IcedPurple · 19/04/2026 17:41

BasiliskStare · 19/04/2026 16:22

I am not a PR expert, not even a novice. But it seems counterintuitive to me that negative publicity is a good thing. OK I can see it keeps them visible , but there's a balance surely?

ETA - that cartoon you posted about the self pity BlueGrey is fantastic.

Edited

I'm also no 'PR expert', whatever that is, but I disagree with this person.

Harry and Meghan are already famous. They should be well beyond the 'any publicity is good publicity' stage. What exactly did this 'tour' achieve in the long term? Sure it got a lot of publicity, but it will be forgottten in a week. How is it going to help them with whatever exactly is their business model?

And this was not the first 'tour'. They did a faux royal tour in NY 5 years ago. Then we also had the Nigeria and Colombia jollies. This one got more hype because it's Australia, but none of their previous tours had any lasting impact. I suspect this won't either.

Indianrollerbird · 19/04/2026 17:41

garlicandsapphires · 19/04/2026 17:29

Controversy = fascinating. Case in point: this thread.

Each to his own, I suppose.

jeffgoldblum · 19/04/2026 17:44

Indianrollerbird · 19/04/2026 17:41

Each to his own, I suppose.

I agree @Indianrollerbird, I like my royals, like my pants…functional… supportive …attractive enough but not flashy !

MonteShitshow · 19/04/2026 17:45

Royal Melbourne Children’s Hospital is an excellent hospital. I suspect they were blindsided by how the visit turned out. They might have expected the usual Royalty visit - respectful, dignified event with genuine purpose eg opening new hospital / raising awareness of childhood illness and research advancements etc.

Instead, they probably had a team from LA herding surprised patients and parents into the photoshoot zone, disappearing after a few posed photos and then finding the photos posted onto a fashion merchandising website.

There might not have been a protocol to follow, or if there had been a protocol, the LA team may have considered it optional and ignored it.

Rhaidimiddim · 19/04/2026 17:47

Indianrollerbird · 19/04/2026 16:46

I think they are firmly in the realm of “my truth“. Remember what Harry said in Spare about his version of events being just as, if not more valid than, anyone else’s objective truth.Their subjective interpretation of how the Australia junket went trumps the objective facts of small crowds, small attendances, and cynical self promotion. In their minds, they were a roaring success and that’s all that matters to them. They feel good about how they were received,and that’s all that matters. Unfortunately, the hospital they visited, the military that allow them to carry out quasi Royal ceremonies and everyone else in Australia who greeted them as Royals have simply added to their feeling that they are wanted and needed and that they are on the right path, irrespective of whatever was agreed in the Sandringham agreement. With a press pack with an agenda behind them, they can continue the charade that half in half out is what the public wants for them, and their only opposition comes from “trolls “ and palace insiders.

AND from the people who stayed away in droves. I'm sure that even this duo managed to clock the lack of crowds.

The Sydney opera house barricade pics sum up what happens when " my truth" hits reality.

IcedPurple · 19/04/2026 17:48

MonteShitshow · 19/04/2026 17:45

Royal Melbourne Children’s Hospital is an excellent hospital. I suspect they were blindsided by how the visit turned out. They might have expected the usual Royalty visit - respectful, dignified event with genuine purpose eg opening new hospital / raising awareness of childhood illness and research advancements etc.

Instead, they probably had a team from LA herding surprised patients and parents into the photoshoot zone, disappearing after a few posed photos and then finding the photos posted onto a fashion merchandising website.

There might not have been a protocol to follow, or if there had been a protocol, the LA team may have considered it optional and ignored it.

Surely a major hospital, especially one caring for children, should have strict protocols about royal 'celebrity' visits? Saying 'Oh they're royal so of course their intentions will be worthy' isn't really good enough. The hospital should have had a detailed plan for the vist laid out in advance and made it very clear what was and was not allowed. They are not blameless here.

Rhaidimiddim · 19/04/2026 17:50

jeffgoldblum · 19/04/2026 17:44

I agree @Indianrollerbird, I like my royals, like my pants…functional… supportive …attractive enough but not flashy !

Any you don't want them to ever embarrass you.

ETA and ironed

OctopusFriend · 19/04/2026 17:51

garlicandsapphires · 19/04/2026 17:29

Controversy = fascinating. Case in point: this thread.

This thread is because H&M are entertaining in the wrong way.
I do not want the heir to the throne and his wife to act like petulant, greedy, ill informed, deceitful and grasping fools.
I'm sure I'm not alone.

OctopusFriend · 19/04/2026 17:53

jeffgoldblum · 19/04/2026 17:44

I agree @Indianrollerbird, I like my royals, like my pants…functional… supportive …attractive enough but not flashy !

Excellent simile!
You don't want them ineffective, trashy, lacking function and pretending to be a mink stole 😂 👙

Lunde · 19/04/2026 18:00

binkie163 · 19/04/2026 14:35

😂😂 tbh the woman who paid $3k and had that money to burn wouldn't touch the crap in the goodie bag, it's just tat, not even displayable collectables.

It looks like the sort of random goody bag that my dds used to get competing in local sporting competitions - depending on who the local sponsors were (a hat, sweets, notebook and/or pens - sometimes socks or a cheapo waterbottle etc)

JSMill · 19/04/2026 18:01

MonteShitshow · 19/04/2026 17:45

Royal Melbourne Children’s Hospital is an excellent hospital. I suspect they were blindsided by how the visit turned out. They might have expected the usual Royalty visit - respectful, dignified event with genuine purpose eg opening new hospital / raising awareness of childhood illness and research advancements etc.

Instead, they probably had a team from LA herding surprised patients and parents into the photoshoot zone, disappearing after a few posed photos and then finding the photos posted onto a fashion merchandising website.

There might not have been a protocol to follow, or if there had been a protocol, the LA team may have considered it optional and ignored it.

I love watching videos of celebrities visiting children’s hospitals and the children’s faces lighting up when they see their favourite football player or whatever. Johnny Depp does a lot of hospital visits dressed as Jack Sparrow. You can see for these celebrities, it’s all about the children. Those two muppets herded a bunch of children into a foyer for their benefit, not the children’s. It looks like they barely spent any time there. You have to be a cold hearted person to breeze in, take a few selfies and breeze out again.

MonteShitshow · 19/04/2026 18:01

IcedPurple · 19/04/2026 17:48

Surely a major hospital, especially one caring for children, should have strict protocols about royal 'celebrity' visits? Saying 'Oh they're royal so of course their intentions will be worthy' isn't really good enough. The hospital should have had a detailed plan for the vist laid out in advance and made it very clear what was and was not allowed. They are not blameless here.

Edited

I absolutely agree! And I hope future potential venues of H&M visits will see this and consider the risks of permitting them seemingly unfettered access to their charges. Those photos from the hospital will be on the Internet forever if nothing is done to withdraw them.

BasiliskStare · 19/04/2026 18:02

OctopusFriend · 19/04/2026 17:53

Excellent simile!
You don't want them ineffective, trashy, lacking function and pretending to be a mink stole 😂 👙

And Octopus , and @jeffgoldblum , I don't want people knowing where I bought my pants from and how much I paid for them every time I go out .

OctopusFriend · 19/04/2026 18:03

BasiliskStare · 19/04/2026 18:02

And Octopus , and @jeffgoldblum , I don't want people knowing where I bought my pants from and how much I paid for them every time I go out .

Indeed! 😊

Indianrollerbird · 19/04/2026 18:08

jeffgoldblum · 19/04/2026 17:44

I agree @Indianrollerbird, I like my royals, like my pants…functional… supportive …attractive enough but not flashy !

I love this! Yes quite! Harry and Meghan are like crotchless knickers from a back street sex shop in comparison!

TheAutumnCrow · 19/04/2026 18:10

Puzzledandpissedoff · 19/04/2026 14:06

Here you go, @Jellybelly80: https://archive.md/1djUl

M wrote a speech once , why bother again? Just keep using the same one

I thought she did, @BasiliskStare? Or perhaps i'm just not paying enough attention and they all sound the same?

Using voices - blah blah - empowerment - word salad - poor me - cliche - family anecdote - self serving twaddle - Proctor & Gamble story .....

Thanks for the archive link, @Puzzledandpissedoff.

Extract:

Dr Max Pemberton [psychiatrist]:

Children like these are nowadays repeatedly told by a wider culture (largely but not exclusively online) that their suffering is their identity. Their trauma is their ‘story’. The worst thing that ever happened to them is also the most interesting thing about them.

It’s a deeply unhelpful mindset that we in mental health services are desperately trying to undo.

And yet here was Meghan, in front of them, doing precisely that, framing her entire life in terms of damage done to her.

There is a pattern here that anyone working in mental health will recognise. Call it a victim identity, or a victimhood mindset, it’s the psychological trap where a person, often following a period of real hurt, begins to build their whole sense of self around the injury ...

... Both of them [H&M], in their different ways, are modelling something deeply unhelpful for a generation already struggling.

People watching can only conclude that the way to prove you are ‘real’ is to keep announcing how wounded you are.

I fear they are teaching these kids that the correct response to hurt is not to heal it but to monetise it.

... if you have built your identity on being the most wronged woman in the world, none of that is any good to you. You need the trolls to keep trolling or your brand bites the dust.

I worry about the young women in that audience. Some will go home and examine their own lives through this new lens. They’ll catalogue every slight, every bad day, every word flung in anger. And they will imagine their suffering is what defines them and makes them who they are. It is not healthy.

(My emphasis)

OctopusFriend · 19/04/2026 18:10

Indianrollerbird · 19/04/2026 18:08

I love this! Yes quite! Harry and Meghan are like crotchless knickers from a back street sex shop in comparison!

😂😂😂
But lie and claim to be cotton Sloggis! 😂