Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Prince Harry and Meghan’s huge Aussie plans revealed. Visit to Sydney and Melbourne in Mid-April​.

1000 replies

ThatAvidViewer · 07/03/2026 18:54

Prince Harry and Meghan’s huge Aussie plans revealed. Visit to Sydney and Melbourne in Mid-April.

EXCLUSIVE

More than seven years after then-newlyweds Prince Harry and Meghan embarked on their hugely successful Aussie tour, the couple is reportedly heading back Down Under.

A source confirmed exclusively to news.com.au that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex are planning to visit Sydney and Melbourne in mid-April.

While their last trip to our shores was in an official capacity as working members of the royal family, this time around they’re travelling as private citizens – and it’s understood they’ll be focusing on activities related to their businesses and philanthropic work.

Details of their specific plans remain unclear, but it’s been rumoured that Meghan will appear as a guest on the Her Best Life podcast, which was initially launched and co-hosted by Jackie “O” Henderson and Gemma O’Neill through their “Besties” company. Earlier this year, just a couple of weeks before her high-profile and abrupt recent exit from her KIIS breakfast show, Henderson revealed that she had decided to “step away” from the venture.

It’s rumoured that Meghan will also appear as a special guest at an upcoming “Besties” event, following in the footsteps of previous VIP speaker Gwyneth Paltrow.

The actress took part in a wide-ranging Q&A with Henderson back in 2023 which attracted around 3,000 ticketholders to the ICC in Sydney’s Darling Harbour – so Meghan’s appearance could be in a similar capacity.
Despite Henderson’s recent departure from the Besties company, she hinted last month that she may return in some capacity in the future - and perhaps Meghan’s involvement could be one such occasion.

Gwyneth Paltrow was the special guest at a Besties event, run by Henderson (left) and Gemma O'Neill, back in 2023 – and Meghan is now rumoured to follow in her footsteps. Picture: Supplied
While details of the couple’s itinerary are expected to be confirmed in the coming weeks, it’s likely that Harry’s plans will involve Australia’s armed forces or veterans’ community, given his strong connections to both.

It’s understood he also has a number of friends locally, fostered across multiple previous visits, including during his month-long stay with the ADF at an army barracks in Darwin back in 2015.
And in his 2023 memoir, Harry gushed over his time living in Australia as a 19-year-old in 2003.
He wrote in Spare that working as a jackaroo on a farm in rural Queensland had helped him find inner peace during what were “some of the best” weeks of his life.

It’s not yet known whether the Sussexes’ children, Prince Archie, 6, and Princess Lilibet, 4, will join them on the trip next month or stay back at the family’s home in Montecito, California.

News.com.au understands that the royal couple’s Aussie visit has been in the works for almost a year.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
51
IcedPurple · 14/04/2026 13:18

IAmATorturedPoet · 14/04/2026 13:15

I agree @jeffgoldblum

It would be a good move for KC to issue a statement. It will publicly show to Harry that the family can see what he is doing (half in half out) this was not agreed, he is not a working member of the RF and those working members of the RF are providing neither support or approval for this or any other visits undertaken by the couple.

If Harry and his wife want to continue to play dress up that’s up to them but they would look even more ridiculous than they do now.

Making a statement gives H&M an importance they don't deserve.

It also sets a precedent. If Charles doesn't issue a statement for the next 'tour' would the implication be that it does in fact have royal approval?

Dunglowing · 14/04/2026 13:18

RecoIIectionsMayVary · 14/04/2026 12:09

‘Call me Meg’: Duchess of Sussex shrugs off title on Australia tour

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/gift/a6df68997a8cb090

So the children photographed in the therapy session had eating disorders. Fragile children plastered on the worlds media.

This is interesting….

“The visit marked a “poignant” moment for the Duke as the hospital was opened by his grandmother, Elizabeth II, in 1963 and again in 2011 when it moved to a new site. His parents, the King and Diana, Princess of Wales, also visited in 1985.”

bluegreygreen · 14/04/2026 13:19

just one official statement saying that Harry and Meghan are no longer working or representing the U.K. or the monarchy would put a stop to this!

There has been one. I don't think there should be more.

Buckingham Palace Statement on The Duke and Duchess of Sussex
Published 19th February 2021

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have confirmed to Her Majesty The Queen that they will not be returning as working members of The Royal Family.

Following conversations with The Duke, The Queen has written confirming that in stepping away from the work of The Royal Family it is not possible to continue with the responsibilities and duties that come with a life of public service. The honorary military appointments and Royal patronages held by The Duke and Duchess will therefore be returned to Her Majesty, before being redistributed among working members of The Royal Family.

While all are saddened by their decision, The Duke and Duchess remain much loved members of the family.

BP statement on RF website

Starryfifty · 14/04/2026 13:20

Passingthrough123 · 14/04/2026 13:16

Of course they do, because Hollywood isn't interested and Ari Emmanuel's company has quietly dropped them, Netflix have shoved them to one side and Spotify have kicked them out of the door. And they need to return fast, because the King passes and William excommunicates them for good.

oh I know the grifters want back as they running out of road but I can't see how William and Kate could manage it

OctopusFriend · 14/04/2026 13:20

Yes, they shouldn't have to keep saying it, really.

IAmATorturedPoet · 14/04/2026 13:20

IcedPurple · 14/04/2026 13:18

Making a statement gives H&M an importance they don't deserve.

It also sets a precedent. If Charles doesn't issue a statement for the next 'tour' would the implication be that it does in fact have royal approval?

Interesting, I think the opposite. I think such a statement would be quite wounding, dent their fragile egos

bluegreygreen · 14/04/2026 13:21

IcedPurple · 14/04/2026 13:18

Making a statement gives H&M an importance they don't deserve.

It also sets a precedent. If Charles doesn't issue a statement for the next 'tour' would the implication be that it does in fact have royal approval?

Agree.

There was one definitive statement.

How many more do there need to be?

Not2identifying · 14/04/2026 13:21

Grey rock has been the right strategy so far. If Charles issued a statement, H & M would 100% clap back - a 'we're free individuals who have go the right to go to public places and it's not our fault if we're popular and people like to give us a warm welcome and service is universal...' and all the rest of it.

My guess is that the media commentary and a lot of SM reaction will do the job of saying 'they're using poorly kids for PR' for the RF.

OctopusFriend · 14/04/2026 13:22

Dunglowing · 14/04/2026 13:18

This is interesting….

“The visit marked a “poignant” moment for the Duke as the hospital was opened by his grandmother, Elizabeth II, in 1963 and again in 2011 when it moved to a new site. His parents, the King and Diana, Princess of Wales, also visited in 1985.”

Oh yes "I am very royal! Look at how royal my relatives are!"

NightBitch · 14/04/2026 13:22

HeddaGabbles · 14/04/2026 11:23

I wonder how they would have felt if one of their own children were in hospital sick and had some wannabe posing for photos with the media using their child as a prop? Without their permission or knowledge? Absolutely disgusting.

There is no way the parents of those children were not asked for permission. I don’t understand why people are assuming this was done without parents’ knowledge. This is a highly esteemed top public children’s hospital. Do people really think these medical
professionals that care for those kids every would be so thoughtless? That the hospital administrators of this hospital would not follow correct proceedure?

What difference is there whether it’s William and Kate or Harry and Meghan visiting sick kids in hospital? It’s a nice thing to do but also it’s PR for both couples.

jeffgoldblum · 14/04/2026 13:23

IcedPurple · 14/04/2026 13:18

Making a statement gives H&M an importance they don't deserve.

It also sets a precedent. If Charles doesn't issue a statement for the next 'tour' would the implication be that it does in fact have royal approval?

That may have worked in the past but as@Longshinyhairhas just pointed out , things are getting worse they are no longer just doing faux royal tours they have now gone one step further and incorporated making money ( commercial) in as well!
this is already gross defiance of the agreement made when they left, the queen was clear they cannot use their royal titles to make money!

bluegreygreen · 14/04/2026 13:23

My guess is that the media commentary and a lot of SM reaction will do the job of saying 'they're using poorly kids for PR' for the RF.

Yes, I think this one might backfire on them - especially if the hospital gets enough flak that it ends up having to put out a statement.

OctopusFriend · 14/04/2026 13:25

jeffgoldblum · 14/04/2026 13:23

That may have worked in the past but as@Longshinyhairhas just pointed out , things are getting worse they are no longer just doing faux royal tours they have now gone one step further and incorporated making money ( commercial) in as well!
this is already gross defiance of the agreement made when they left, the queen was clear they cannot use their royal titles to make money!

That's the issue, isn't it? How rogue they've gone out of desperation.

IAmATorturedPoet · 14/04/2026 13:25

They will have another Andrew and Sarah situation on their hands if they’re not careful.

jeffgoldblum · 14/04/2026 13:26

bluegreygreen · 14/04/2026 13:19

just one official statement saying that Harry and Meghan are no longer working or representing the U.K. or the monarchy would put a stop to this!

There has been one. I don't think there should be more.

Buckingham Palace Statement on The Duke and Duchess of Sussex
Published 19th February 2021

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have confirmed to Her Majesty The Queen that they will not be returning as working members of The Royal Family.

Following conversations with The Duke, The Queen has written confirming that in stepping away from the work of The Royal Family it is not possible to continue with the responsibilities and duties that come with a life of public service. The honorary military appointments and Royal patronages held by The Duke and Duchess will therefore be returned to Her Majesty, before being redistributed among working members of The Royal Family.

While all are saddened by their decision, The Duke and Duchess remain much loved members of the family.

BP statement on RF website

Harry and Meghan are obviously a bit forgetful! Clearly a reminder is needed!
especially as it seems purely coincidental that it started and seems to be getting progressively worse since the queen died!

Longshinyhair · 14/04/2026 13:26

jeffgoldblum · 14/04/2026 13:17

Exactly! It’s not difficult, or controversial as some seem to think!

Yes poor helpless Charles can’t take them off the royal website or say they don’t represent the UK or his government on their pretendy tours, particularly when Harry holds talks with the First Nations Chief about the Crowns’s commitment to Canada’s indigenous people, wonder what he’s going to offer Australia’s indigenous people? Yes Charles is utterly powerless and definitely can’t say anything🙄

OctopusFriend · 14/04/2026 13:27

jeffgoldblum · 14/04/2026 13:26

Harry and Meghan are obviously a bit forgetful! Clearly a reminder is needed!
especially as it seems purely coincidental that it started and seems to be getting progressively worse since the queen died!

Indeed! They think KC is soft. Or they don't care.

smilesy · 14/04/2026 13:29

jeffgoldblum · 14/04/2026 13:23

That may have worked in the past but as@Longshinyhairhas just pointed out , things are getting worse they are no longer just doing faux royal tours they have now gone one step further and incorporated making money ( commercial) in as well!
this is already gross defiance of the agreement made when they left, the queen was clear they cannot use their royal titles to make money!

If anyone should make a statement, it should probably be the government. The RF only undertake tours at their request. I think if I remember rightly the government have already done this when they went to Nigeria? I agree with those who say that a statement from the RF would only be more grist to their mill. Over explaining is the Sussexes speciality and I think they are just making themselves look more desperate

bluegreygreen · 14/04/2026 13:29

Incidentally, the Royal patronages were listed on the website for the benefit of the press - Invictus wasn't a Royal patronage.

OctopusFriend · 14/04/2026 13:29

BBC news report "This has all the hallmarks of a royal tour. There are also money making ventures"
🙄

Not2identifying · 14/04/2026 13:29

I think they are getting worse because Plan A isn't working out (become internationally renowned billionaire global thought leaders and change makers).

IAmATorturedPoet · 14/04/2026 13:30

jeffgoldblum · 14/04/2026 13:26

Harry and Meghan are obviously a bit forgetful! Clearly a reminder is needed!
especially as it seems purely coincidental that it started and seems to be getting progressively worse since the queen died!

Yes.The couple’s memories are selective. They need to be reminded whilst they are doing it. A bit like parenting a toddler, address it at the time otherwise it loses its impact.

jeffgoldblum · 14/04/2026 13:31

OctopusFriend · 14/04/2026 13:27

Indeed! They think KC is soft. Or they don't care.

This is entirely why I believe Charles needs to reissue a statement reiterating the previous one by the queen!
they need reminding that nothing has changed for them just because the queen died and Charles is now king !
out is out .

Indianrollerbird · 14/04/2026 13:32

IcedPurple · 14/04/2026 13:18

Making a statement gives H&M an importance they don't deserve.

It also sets a precedent. If Charles doesn't issue a statement for the next 'tour' would the implication be that it does in fact have royal approval?

Oh for heaven's sake, he can issue a statement that they do not represent the RF for this or any future tour. They are already poncing about like working royals and getting masses of press coverage - importance that they don't deserve. A firm and final statement on their lack of royal backing is what is needed, along with their removal off the royal website. Charles is too much of a coward to take their titles, so he'll leave that to his eldest to deal with, no doubt.

jeffgoldblum · 14/04/2026 13:36

Indianrollerbird · 14/04/2026 13:32

Oh for heaven's sake, he can issue a statement that they do not represent the RF for this or any future tour. They are already poncing about like working royals and getting masses of press coverage - importance that they don't deserve. A firm and final statement on their lack of royal backing is what is needed, along with their removal off the royal website. Charles is too much of a coward to take their titles, so he'll leave that to his eldest to deal with, no doubt.

I don’t think removing the titles is needed as long as a firm statement reiterating the facts is issued!

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread