Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

How come William chose to ignore the massive elephant in the room and no one challenged him on it?

850 replies

Roadtripwithpretzels · 19/02/2026 08:21

Prince William spoke about the very important subject of mh yesterday on Radio One and while it’s a subject that should be highlighted, does no one else think that his credibility on this issue has now been damaged by the AMW case?

He may not have been personally responsible for the alleged cover up, and he may well loathe Uncle Andrew, but he is still a central player in the institution that helped to pay off and cover up the voices of AMW’s alleged victims? Virginia Giuffre took her own life fhs! He can’t just ignore it!

To me this interview came across as incredibly unintelligent and insensitive in current circumstances. And proof that William himself just doesn’t “get it”.

Why on earth did he not say that in the light of current circumstances and out of respect for victims; the interview couldn’t go ahead?

Or why did his new ex crisis manager PR person not advise this?

And why was he allowed to sit there by the BBC and not address this?

And what about the mh of the Palace staff who have suffered because of AMW’s boorish and inappropriate behaviour for years? The nanny who allegedly left because of AMW being inappropriate and the policeman whose arm was hurt by AMW’s speeding at Windsor? The maids who were screamed at? What about the mental health of the police protection offices who quite recently were, according to Lownie, reminded about their NDAs and the safety of their pensions if they spoke out?

I don’t think it’s good enough any longer for a senior member of the RF to sit there and say yet again in a rather generic way “we all need to talk about our mental health” while ignoring what their own institution has covered up for years and is still allegedly trying to suppress?

And the BBC should hold some accountability about this too!

OP posts:
Thread gallery
19
BigWillyLittleTodger · 01/04/2026 16:26

CurlewKate · 01/04/2026 06:56

To be honest, it’s more like any questioning or criticism of the Royal Family is met by “Look! Look over there! They are SO much worse!” A bit like the people who say we have to keep the monarchy or we’ll have President Farage.

You could say the same on the H&M discussions, a debate about her jam business is normally interrupted with but but Andrew fairly promptly.

IisMaccaPacca · 01/04/2026 16:56

CurlewKate · 01/04/2026 06:56

To be honest, it’s more like any questioning or criticism of the Royal Family is met by “Look! Look over there! They are SO much worse!” A bit like the people who say we have to keep the monarchy or we’ll have President Farage.

A bit like the people who say we have to keep the monarchy or we’ll have President Farage.
They have a point 😂

CurlewKate · 01/04/2026 17:25

bluegreygreen · 01/04/2026 15:34

Yes, most people go on holiday with their children when they can.

Where they can't it tends to be limited by financial considerations (employment restrictions, or self-employed people unable to take that long away).

I've never yet heard of someone not going on holiday with their children out of tact towards others, but I suppose anything's possible.

Of course they do.But most working parents can’t take all of all of their children’s school holidays off work, though. And announcing the fact that’s what they’re doing is tactless, surely? Not good PR.

CurlewKate · 01/04/2026 17:28

BigWillyLittleTodger · 01/04/2026 16:26

You could say the same on the H&M discussions, a debate about her jam business is normally interrupted with but but Andrew fairly promptly.

Frankly, selling the extremely gullible shit overpriced jam isn’t as bad as a bit of sex trafficking and insider trading!

CurlewKate · 01/04/2026 17:28

BigWillyLittleTodger · 01/04/2026 16:23

I know William is criticised for even breathing on these threads but to complain about him being “arrogant and entitled” whilst defending his wife and children whilst on a bike ride from a man who was following them, hiding in bushes, hanging around outside their house and then filming them is really scraping the barrel.

I agree.

CurlewKate · 01/04/2026 17:36

BemusedAmerican · 01/04/2026 15:25

@CurlewKate NYC holidays in public schools start tomorrow and run through next week. I work in an upper-middle class neighborhood, and the families will be away until the 11th or 12th. This also happens at Christmas and the last 2 weeks of August.

By families I mean both parents, the kids, and the caregiver is sent on vacation. These children attend the free NYC public schools. They don't attend private ones where parents pay tuition.

That’s 6 weeks. Private schools in the UK tend to get at least 15 weeks holiday. And in my experience of American friends often the wage earner commutes to work from their holiday for some of that time.

savvy7 · 01/04/2026 17:50

So they saw the photographer drive past their house and instead of calling their minions / foot soldiers to see off said photographer they went out on their bikes with their children??

savvy7 · 01/04/2026 17:54

Anyway I understand their new house has a 3 mile exclusion zone around it. A luxury not available to the lowly peasants.

simpsonthecat · 01/04/2026 18:00

CurlewKate · 01/04/2026 17:25

Of course they do.But most working parents can’t take all of all of their children’s school holidays off work, though. And announcing the fact that’s what they’re doing is tactless, surely? Not good PR.

Totally agree. I imagine they have 16 weeks holiday off school per year and Kate & William rarely do anything during these weeks unless it is imperative

Yes I know before anyone says they are doing it differently for their children. Just not sure BOTH parents need to be there 'for the children'

Lunde · 01/04/2026 18:13

wordler · 01/04/2026 16:15

I was quite fascinated with this story at the time because it was mid Covid restrictions where we were all supposed to be only going out once a day for our daily exercise and staying in our ‘bubbles’.

The one exception for leaving the house was for work. So I was interested in how the rules stretched for someone like a paparazzi style / freelance photographer. Was the work travel extension applicable to speculative roaming for pap photography?

I believe this particular photographer was claiming it was public interest because he was trying to catch the Wales breaking the Covid rules - I think he believed they were breaking their bubble by meeting up with the then Wessexes.

So he had been lurking around their house for a few days with his camera and they finally came face to face with him when they were all out on a bike ride but without their protection officers - so most of the video was William calling his security while telling the photographer off for stalking them.

At the time the photographer had quite an open Facebook page for his business and was boasting about how all the royals hate him and how he likes getting a rise out them.

I saw the videos he posted - that guy came across as a really creepy stalker. He followed the Wales family at low speed in his car attempting to photograph their kids while William and Kate were having a bike ride without security on a narrow country lane. In the William was forced to stop and call for security so that Kate could get the kids home.

jeffgoldblum · 01/04/2026 18:19

savvy7 · 01/04/2026 17:50

So they saw the photographer drive past their house and instead of calling their minions / foot soldiers to see off said photographer they went out on their bikes with their children??

That is not what happened at all! Are you being deliberately misleading?
the photographer was also on a bike ! And hiding in the bushes! 🤨

Lunde · 01/04/2026 18:19

CurlewKate · 01/04/2026 17:25

Of course they do.But most working parents can’t take all of all of their children’s school holidays off work, though. And announcing the fact that’s what they’re doing is tactless, surely? Not good PR.

I don't think they ever said that they were taking the "school holidays off work" - they said they would be doing fewer public engagements - like many modern parents they likely work from home for part of the holidays.

I used to work from home for a substantial part of my own kids' 14-15 weeks of school holidays.

Lunde · 01/04/2026 18:20

savvy7 · 01/04/2026 17:50

So they saw the photographer drive past their house and instead of calling their minions / foot soldiers to see off said photographer they went out on their bikes with their children??

That is not what happened.

Odd that there are people on Mumsnet defending creeps following and photographing young children without parental consent.

jeffgoldblum · 01/04/2026 18:21

Lunde · 01/04/2026 18:13

I saw the videos he posted - that guy came across as a really creepy stalker. He followed the Wales family at low speed in his car attempting to photograph their kids while William and Kate were having a bike ride without security on a narrow country lane. In the William was forced to stop and call for security so that Kate could get the kids home.

He had a bike in the footage I saw @Lunde !

CurlewKate · 01/04/2026 18:22

Lunde · 01/04/2026 18:20

That is not what happened.

Odd that there are people on Mumsnet defending creeps following and photographing young children without parental consent.

I’m not.

jeffgoldblum · 01/04/2026 18:23

jeffgoldblum · 01/04/2026 18:21

He had a bike in the footage I saw @Lunde !

Of course we could both be correct, I heard this was not the first time he had done this .

savvy7 · 01/04/2026 18:28

Maybe I've seen a different video then. In the one I saw, only William is on screen and a bit of the photographer who is on a bike I think. No footage of the children.

Lunde · 01/04/2026 19:26

savvy7 · 01/04/2026 18:28

Maybe I've seen a different video then. In the one I saw, only William is on screen and a bit of the photographer who is on a bike I think. No footage of the children.

I think that is the very, very end few seconds of one of the clips I've seen where William (finally) gets angry and stops to confront him to allow Kate and the kids to get away and cycle home.

There was a second one with a man in a car stalking them on a deserted lane - and you hear Kate saying she recognises him because he has been driving past their house in the background - but that clip seems to have disappeared

jeffgoldblum · 01/04/2026 19:33

Lunde · 01/04/2026 19:26

I think that is the very, very end few seconds of one of the clips I've seen where William (finally) gets angry and stops to confront him to allow Kate and the kids to get away and cycle home.

There was a second one with a man in a car stalking them on a deserted lane - and you hear Kate saying she recognises him because he has been driving past their house in the background - but that clip seems to have disappeared

Yes thanks! , I knew I’d seen two different ones from the same man!! , he’s basically a stalker.

Futurehappiness · 01/04/2026 19:55

I am no particular fan of William but I don't blame him for getting angry on that occasion at his children being followed and photographed without consent.

It is ironic though that he is otherwise content for them to be regularly paraded and photographed doing royal 'work', to the extent of accepting presents from random members of the public. Very few people seem to comment on how strange this all is. Although anti-monarchists like me are accused of being hard on the RF, it is us who would like to see those children have a normal childhood and then be free to do whatever they choose to do, when they grow up.

BigWillyLittleTodger · 01/04/2026 23:12

CurlewKate · 01/04/2026 17:28

Frankly, selling the extremely gullible shit overpriced jam isn’t as bad as a bit of sex trafficking and insider trading!

Where did I say it was? bringing Andrew into a discussion on jam is completely irrelevant and a common attempt to shut down discussion, you have literally demonstrated exactly my point in your post.

NightBitch · 02/04/2026 01:53

BigWillyLittleTodger · 01/04/2026 23:12

Where did I say it was? bringing Andrew into a discussion on jam is completely irrelevant and a common attempt to shut down discussion, you have literally demonstrated exactly my point in your post.

I don’t think it’s the jam that prompts the ‘but Andrew’ responses. I think it’s the often over the top criticism of Meghan herself.

CurlewKate · 02/04/2026 04:20

BigWillyLittleTodger · 01/04/2026 23:12

Where did I say it was? bringing Andrew into a discussion on jam is completely irrelevant and a common attempt to shut down discussion, you have literally demonstrated exactly my point in your post.

For the avoidance of doubt, it wasn’t me who first mentioned The Purveyor of Jam- it was this post.

“These anti William posts are so tedious and disingenuous. Each and every time there is a such thread it reads like a puerile attempt to elevate the couple who move to California, their names escape me.”

edited to add: Sorry, that quoted post was from @IisMaccaPacca

BoxingHare · 02/04/2026 10:12

I don't really get why John the bloke who follows them about to engagements is being introduced to the children, and why it's so far acceptable for the kids to interact with, share selfies, and accept gifts from strangers.

The Wales must think a contained environment is safer somehow.

But if the guy who follows them for photos is also known to them now, then they know he's not a physical threat.

I suppose it's that dichotomy of wanting and needing the publicity in order to maintain both interest and visibility, and also to feed the interest in a single head of state family, but also wanting privacy so they can have a more normal life out of the public eye. So they've drawn their own line of public/private that they don't want others to cross. Problem is, others have different lines!

Now with most other celebs they keep the kids out of the public gaze full stop, so there's no ambiguity. But some royal fans are desperate to see the kids as they're growing up to see who they might be most like (comparing Charlotte to QE2, for instance), and so on, plus George is in line to be king after his dad.

I think it's an awful position to be placed in, wanting privacy for your family but also knowing your child has a job lined up so must be on show some of the time.

It the biggest thing I don't get about royalists, why they're happy for children to be publicised like this, and also that they're trained for a specific role from childhood and have pretty limited choices with regards their own lives. Why would anyone support that? Even for the wealth etc, it's a pretty strict future ahead.

BemusedAmerican · 02/04/2026 15:04

When they see John, etc., it's in a work setting. I remember the photographer incident. They weren't working, they were home on their own estate.

I used to work with a coworker with mental health issues. He would constantly harass me at work. I told my boss that if he followed me home, I would get a restraining order.

Work is not the same as home. Everyone deserves one safe space.

NYC kids get multiple one day holidays as the DOE observes everything from Jewish holidays through Hindu ones. Then there is Christmas, Easter, spring break, winter recess, Thanksgiving, etc.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread