Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

How come William chose to ignore the massive elephant in the room and no one challenged him on it?

850 replies

Roadtripwithpretzels · 19/02/2026 08:21

Prince William spoke about the very important subject of mh yesterday on Radio One and while it’s a subject that should be highlighted, does no one else think that his credibility on this issue has now been damaged by the AMW case?

He may not have been personally responsible for the alleged cover up, and he may well loathe Uncle Andrew, but he is still a central player in the institution that helped to pay off and cover up the voices of AMW’s alleged victims? Virginia Giuffre took her own life fhs! He can’t just ignore it!

To me this interview came across as incredibly unintelligent and insensitive in current circumstances. And proof that William himself just doesn’t “get it”.

Why on earth did he not say that in the light of current circumstances and out of respect for victims; the interview couldn’t go ahead?

Or why did his new ex crisis manager PR person not advise this?

And why was he allowed to sit there by the BBC and not address this?

And what about the mh of the Palace staff who have suffered because of AMW’s boorish and inappropriate behaviour for years? The nanny who allegedly left because of AMW being inappropriate and the policeman whose arm was hurt by AMW’s speeding at Windsor? The maids who were screamed at? What about the mental health of the police protection offices who quite recently were, according to Lownie, reminded about their NDAs and the safety of their pensions if they spoke out?

I don’t think it’s good enough any longer for a senior member of the RF to sit there and say yet again in a rather generic way “we all need to talk about our mental health” while ignoring what their own institution has covered up for years and is still allegedly trying to suppress?

And the BBC should hold some accountability about this too!

OP posts:
Thread gallery
19
NewAgeNewMe · 22/03/2026 17:53

BoxingHare · 22/03/2026 17:21

Apparently they both became more religious after the cancer diagnosis.

That's handy, isn't it?

What with him needing to show he's got some kind of interest in Christianity as he's going to be the head of the CofE in the not very distant future.

Edited

My dad became very religious after he had cancer. My mum less so. 😁

wordler · 22/03/2026 18:40

BoxingHare · 22/03/2026 17:10

There is no quiet faith, anyone believing there is needs to give their heads a wobble.

Of course a bond couldn't be established, I expect he was annoyed at being contacted. That "irritated silence" the press talk about.

In my opinion it was a wise move keeping his distance from Welby. I would also be keen to avoid overtures from Lambeth Palace during his tenure.

I am very much looking forward to the first female archbishop.

wordler · 22/03/2026 19:02

I was a little shocked at that article claiming that the new archbishop will be the one to preside over William’s coronation though because she has to retire in seven years at 70 so are we assuming Charles doesn’t have more than seven years?

bluegreygreen · 22/03/2026 19:15

I hadn't realised that @wordler (am not Anglican, so didn't follow the appointment very closely).

That does seem a surprising assumption to make in an article.

RainbowBagels · 22/03/2026 19:29

BillericayDickie · 22/03/2026 16:04

Do any of the RF go to church on an ordinary Sunday?
I get the feeling that they only do it on the big days.

The Late Queen went regularly, and I think Charles does. It doesn't really matter about the rest of them, but the Monarch is the head of the C of E. You can't make anyone believe, but this is such obvious PR that I would think William doesn't believe, but he does want to be King, so will be running to church, wearing crosses etc so that he can do so.

BoxingHare · 22/03/2026 19:33

wordler · 22/03/2026 19:02

I was a little shocked at that article claiming that the new archbishop will be the one to preside over William’s coronation though because she has to retire in seven years at 70 so are we assuming Charles doesn’t have more than seven years?

I'd be gobsmacked if he was still here in seven years!

BoxingHare · 22/03/2026 19:38

RainbowBagels · 22/03/2026 19:29

The Late Queen went regularly, and I think Charles does. It doesn't really matter about the rest of them, but the Monarch is the head of the C of E. You can't make anyone believe, but this is such obvious PR that I would think William doesn't believe, but he does want to be King, so will be running to church, wearing crosses etc so that he can do so.

Exactly! He's never shown any inclination towards being Christian, yet suddenly when he'll be king before too long the quiet PR begins.

WhyCantISleepAgainTonight · 22/03/2026 19:46

BoxingHare · 22/03/2026 19:33

I'd be gobsmacked if he was still here in seven years!

I’d be surprised if he’s here in 2 years. We are being primed for William fairly imminently being King. Quiet faith….lol. Very, very, very quiet! 😂 How gullible do they think we are? Although many will lap it up because when it comes to the Royals, they believe anything.

BoxingHare · 22/03/2026 20:25

I’d be surprised if he’s here in 2 years

It'll be a real achievement if he gets past 80.

bluegreygreen · 22/03/2026 20:31

There is no quiet faith

I don't think I would presume to say that of anyone.

wordler · 22/03/2026 21:28

I’m surprised by this I was thinking he’d ‘live’ with his cancer for a significant time into his mid/late 80s, even if not as long as his parents.

RainbowBagels · 22/03/2026 22:04

I mean he still could. It's not like ' From Mumsnetters keyboards to the Grim Reapers ears'!
Of course, there is always the possibility that the AMW scandal doesn't go away so they're preparing defcon 1- Charles abdicating and hoping William can save them while he's still youngish.

bluegreygreen · 22/03/2026 22:57

wordler · 22/03/2026 21:28

I’m surprised by this I was thinking he’d ‘live’ with his cancer for a significant time into his mid/late 80s, even if not as long as his parents.

I had assumed, judging by how fatigued he looks sometimes, that he is more unwell than we have been told, but I have always maintained that the RF have the same right to medical confidentiality as anyone else.

Hence I was as surprised as you at an assumption being made in the middle of an article.

BoxingHare · 22/03/2026 23:10

wordler · 22/03/2026 21:28

I’m surprised by this I was thinking he’d ‘live’ with his cancer for a significant time into his mid/late 80s, even if not as long as his parents.

If he didn't look so ill a lot of the time I'd say the same. But he does, so I think mid eighties is pretty unfeasible.

MidWayThruJanuary · 22/03/2026 23:23

Would William agree to Charles abdicating though? Given the impact it would have on George’s life?

LBFseBrom · 23/03/2026 00:04

Oh for goodness sakes, does nobody think of anything else but AMW and Epstein these days? Ridiculous question, all that had nothing to do with William.

RainbowBagels · 23/03/2026 07:06

MidWayThruJanuary · 22/03/2026 23:23

Would William agree to Charles abdicating though? Given the impact it would have on George’s life?

If the choice is RF or no RF, I would say yes. They are involving him in the whole business already anyway unnecessarily imo. He'll hopefully have a break from it from boarding school to the end of University.

Gonefishingithink · 23/03/2026 07:10

To me he looks like a dying man. I know I’ll get jumped on, but the change in him from when his mother died to now is huge.

Serenster · 23/03/2026 10:23

WhyCantISleepAgainTonight · 22/03/2026 19:46

I’d be surprised if he’s here in 2 years. We are being primed for William fairly imminently being King. Quiet faith….lol. Very, very, very quiet! 😂 How gullible do they think we are? Although many will lap it up because when it comes to the Royals, they believe anything.

Impeccable logic, given Prince Charles revealed his Anglican faith right before his mother’s death too….oh wait, no, he didn’t, that happened in 1994 when Charles was 45 (about the same age William is now in others words and a good 30 years before he became king.

People think about big questions Ike this as they grow older, and if you are in line to hold a position of significance in a religious organisation, you tend think about it more, I imagine. And speak about it, as people want to know. The Aga Khan is a good equivalent here, I imagine.

MrsLeonFarrell · 23/03/2026 14:11

In his position William has to occasionally mention faith I see nothing more in this than that. Lots of people think about faith as they age, or face a health problem. Lots of people have faith but don't attend church regularly. Lots of people have quiet faith they don't dwell the need to discuss with others. William is no different to many other people, I don't see why his statement is being questioned.

WhyCantISleepAgainTonight · 23/03/2026 15:23

Serenster · 23/03/2026 10:23

Impeccable logic, given Prince Charles revealed his Anglican faith right before his mother’s death too….oh wait, no, he didn’t, that happened in 1994 when Charles was 45 (about the same age William is now in others words and a good 30 years before he became king.

People think about big questions Ike this as they grow older, and if you are in line to hold a position of significance in a religious organisation, you tend think about it more, I imagine. And speak about it, as people want to know. The Aga Khan is a good equivalent here, I imagine.

As I said, some people will lap it up and believe anything about the Royals.

RainbowBagels · 23/03/2026 15:47

MrsLeonFarrell · 23/03/2026 14:11

In his position William has to occasionally mention faith I see nothing more in this than that. Lots of people think about faith as they age, or face a health problem. Lots of people have faith but don't attend church regularly. Lots of people have quiet faith they don't dwell the need to discuss with others. William is no different to many other people, I don't see why his statement is being questioned.

It wasn't his statement for a start. It was some PR waffle that said nothing and attributed to unnamed ' sources- so basically Williams PR. It included some nonsense about how he couldn't go to church with small children ( because no one else takes their kids to church, and he absolutely doesn't have a nanny or armies of staff)
Plus lots of people have a quiet faith and don't attend church but no one else is in line to be Supreme Head of the C of E. It's like a senior Cardinal saying ' Oh I have a quiet faith- that's why I haven't bothered going to church until now, when I'm about to be made Pope!'

Serenster · 23/03/2026 16:33

It's like a senior Cardinal saying ' Oh I have a quiet faith- that's why I haven't bothered going to church until now, when I'm about to be made Pope!'

Like Justin Welby, you mean? Who was embarrassed in his youth to have realised he had a faith and hid it until his mid 30s when he left his oil industry career and was ordained as a priest?

deeahgwitch · 23/03/2026 17:29

I thought it was awfully convenient when Kate was confirmed just before the big Royal wedding in Westminster Abbey.
Confirmation 10 March 2011
Wedding 29 April 2011

MrsLeonFarrell · 23/03/2026 17:33

deeahgwitch · 23/03/2026 17:29

I thought it was awfully convenient when Kate was confirmed just before the big Royal wedding in Westminster Abbey.
Confirmation 10 March 2011
Wedding 29 April 2011

I'm not sure but I think it may have been a legal requirement for Catherine. I may be making that up though! I can't remember.

Swipe left for the next trending thread