Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Andrew - continuing his effort to end the Monarchy

1000 replies

TheHaplessWit · 10/01/2026 01:37

Another new story on Andrew today. Photo's have emerged showing that on Epstein's desk, there were emails regarding Epstein paying debts owed by Andrew/Sarah to staff:

https://people.com/epstein-had-emails-staff-ex-prince-andrew-sarah-ferguson-new-photos-show-11880419

Why on Earth was a Prince of England having his staff paid by a sex trafficker?
Doesn't seem "too honourable" to me.

Epstein Had Emails from Staff of Ex-Prince Andrew and Sarah Ferguson on His Desk in Newly Shared Photos

New photos from Jeffrey Epstein's New York home appear to show an email exchange between former staffers for ex-Prince Andrew and Sarah Ferguson.

https://people.com/epstein-had-emails-staff-ex-prince-andrew-sarah-ferguson-new-photos-show-11880419

OP posts:
Thread gallery
33
Isabella70 · 31/01/2026 18:20

Ukisgaslit · 31/01/2026 16:12

I agree . To me the prone female figure ( is she conscious ?) looks like a child or a teenager.

I have no words for this revolting family . Charles , William , Elizabeth , all of them knew what Andrew was up to. All of them.
They did not lift a finger . I doubt they see it as wrong .

The little they have done was prompted by outside pressure .
Andrew should be answering police questions. Instead he is still protected .
And some people support this institution?
The longer this goes on the more sick our self declared unelected head of state is shown to be.

Just waiting for one of his team to claim he was on a first aid course.

Indigovelvet · 31/01/2026 18:23

Andrew is disgusting.

Rhaidimiddim · 31/01/2026 18:31

Ukisgaslit · 31/01/2026 17:11

@simpsonthecat

Andrew and the trade ‘deadline envoy’ scandals further implicates Elizabeth Windsor . She was told repeatedly about his behaviour.

I admit I didn’t see that part of the thread I just saw @IdaGlossop post mentioning how young the girl looked and I’d had felt the same .

I only glanced when the image appeared on social media and haven’t read about it.

I find it deeply unsettling that the head of state has not made any statement. Decent people are disgusted . There is a deep disconnection between the public and this so called royal family. It’s dystopian. We are expected to look the other way and pretend it isn’t happening when the Windsors appear

I saw a man ask William Windsor about the Andrew issue and it appeared that William’s protection approached the man and basically told him to stop.
Message received .

The Head of State has stripped him of his birthright titles, downgraded his accommodation significantly, and ( in public at least) banished him from membership of the RF.

That is some statement, right there.

MidWayThruJanuary · 31/01/2026 18:42

Only by force of public pressure @Rhaidimiddim

AnnunciataM · 31/01/2026 18:58

Yes, I think it got to the point where they had to do something and the king realised it would reflect very badly on him if he didn't. Or perhaps he thought there were worse revelations to come and he'd be better off taking action now.

Ukisgaslit · 31/01/2026 19:05

Rhaidimiddim · 31/01/2026 18:31

The Head of State has stripped him of his birthright titles, downgraded his accommodation significantly, and ( in public at least) banished him from membership of the RF.

That is some statement, right there.

Nope .

Window dressing to fool the gullible.

And Andrew is still HRH.

TheHaplessWit · 31/01/2026 19:06

Rhaidimiddim · 31/01/2026 18:31

The Head of State has stripped him of his birthright titles, downgraded his accommodation significantly, and ( in public at least) banished him from membership of the RF.

That is some statement, right there.

The man paid off a victim of sexual abuse (rather than try to prove innocence), lied in a BBC interview (when he said he'd cut contact but emails prove otherwise) and you think moving him to a slightly smaller mansion ("downgraded his accommodation significantly") counts as sufficient punishment???

If any member of the public had done what he's done then they'd be in jail, he should be too.

OP posts:
DeborahVance · 31/01/2026 19:22

That photo is genuinely shocking. To me that is clearly a child.

Horrific

simpsonthecat · 31/01/2026 19:22

Isabella70 · 31/01/2026 18:20

Just waiting for one of his team to claim he was on a first aid course.

Sorry but that made me laugh! (and those victims don't need a joke around this, my utmost sympathy goes to them big time, I wish them justice)

CPR perhaps, what on earth was the matter with that young girl that Andrew needed to kneel on the floor whilst she appeared comatose.

alexdgr8 · 31/01/2026 19:33

HilaryThorpe · 31/01/2026 15:15

It cost £220,000 in 1862.

Which is Approx 35 million today value

TheAutumnCrow · 31/01/2026 19:35

Ukisgaslit · 31/01/2026 19:05

Nope .

Window dressing to fool the gullible.

And Andrew is still HRH.

I think the HRH finally went for a burton late last year in a Letter Patent published in the London Gazette; but he is still technically a Counsellor of State and, of course, in the line of succession (8th). Grim.

working9 · 31/01/2026 19:43

MrsLeonFarrell · 31/01/2026 14:03

I have said before, and I still believed, that I think that the late Queen's long reign was harmful in terms of the institution's evolution. The monarchy needs to be able to change as society changes and it got stuck in a 1950s deference were the emphasis was on being seen rather than what you said and how you behaved when not in public.

In the age of social media image means nothing if people find you inauthentic. Sometimes the purity spiral that demands 100% perfection is stupid because, let's face it, no one can ever reach perfection but on a more achievable level the demand for authenticity is helpful. It means that people can't just say things, they have to do them. We notice when someone is saying one thing and doing another. It opens up questions about use of funds and resources.

If we are to continue as a constitutional monarchy there need to be changes and I think Andrew is experiencing one of the changes. A minor royal can no longer be seen to be supported in luxury just because of who his mum was. Appalling behaviour will have consequences, albeit probably not legal ones which I don't think it's about his royal status specifically, in terms of titles and access.

It will be interesting to see how things go in the next few years.

I disagree with this. The Queen was refreshing in that she didn’t pander to social media trends - she was above it all. You’d never see her making videos like Kate’s recent nature film for example, which drew a lot of criticism. She simply got on with the job and was all about service. If people see that as old-fashioned and “not moving with the times” then it’s a shame as those are good qualities that many other people hugely respected!

PinkPanther57 · 31/01/2026 19:49

working9 · 31/01/2026 19:43

I disagree with this. The Queen was refreshing in that she didn’t pander to social media trends - she was above it all. You’d never see her making videos like Kate’s recent nature film for example, which drew a lot of criticism. She simply got on with the job and was all about service. If people see that as old-fashioned and “not moving with the times” then it’s a shame as those are good qualities that many other people hugely respected!

Maybe but I think of her tossing stones into the river re: a 70s Queen’s speech & poss equiv sentiment of Kate’s vid.

Ukisgaslit · 31/01/2026 19:52

@TheAutumnCrow

Thanks - but I’m not so sure that Andrew’s ‘stylings’ have been removed. I think they are in abeyance . I know Andrew said he wouldn’t use the ( nonsense) terms ‘prince’ ‘duke’ but that caused an outcry . So the first grift didn’t work.
Then Charles got shouted at in public and suddenly ‘letters patent ‘ ( more nonsense ) were fussed around with . So what ?

I think Andrew is still HRH unless there is legislation.
But that is a side show
All this so called first family has to do was allow the officers of the law to interview Andrew. Andrew himself is on film pledging to help the police .
More lies .

MidWayThruJanuary · 31/01/2026 19:53

@working9
It’s a real pity that ‘getting on with the job’ included a complete refusal to listen to people who knew exactly what Andrew was up to. Her legacy has been tarnished and stained.

Lalgarh · 31/01/2026 19:54

Alleged involvement in the torture of a girl who later died

https://www.reddit.com/r/RoyalsGossip/comments/1qs2sx5/tip_email_from_epstein_files_alleges_andrew/

Noseyoldcow · 31/01/2026 19:55

TheHaplessWit · 31/01/2026 19:06

The man paid off a victim of sexual abuse (rather than try to prove innocence), lied in a BBC interview (when he said he'd cut contact but emails prove otherwise) and you think moving him to a slightly smaller mansion ("downgraded his accommodation significantly") counts as sufficient punishment???

If any member of the public had done what he's done then they'd be in jail, he should be too.

Paying off one’s opponent in a civil case is not against the law, either in America or here in the UK. Lying in a BBC interview is not a criminal offence either. I was hopeful that the slimy bastard would finally get pinned down for asking his private detective to look for dirt on Virginia, but apparently there’s no case to answer there either. You’re not alone in wanting to see Mr AMW staying properly at His Majesty’s pleasure, i.e. in clink as opposed to a nice gaff on his brothers land, but he’s got to be criminally prosecuted for that to happen. I’m not holding my breath for that to happen.

MrsLeonFarrell · 31/01/2026 19:57

working9 · 31/01/2026 19:43

I disagree with this. The Queen was refreshing in that she didn’t pander to social media trends - she was above it all. You’d never see her making videos like Kate’s recent nature film for example, which drew a lot of criticism. She simply got on with the job and was all about service. If people see that as old-fashioned and “not moving with the times” then it’s a shame as those are good qualities that many other people hugely respected!

She didn't just get on with the job and was all about service. She refused to do anything about the very serious accusations against Andrew until far too late. She then insisted he pay Virginia Guiffre an enormous sum so that the case didn't interfere with the celebrations around her diamond jubilee. If that wasn't about appearance rather than substance what was?

The late Queen devoted her life to the country, admirably, but in the process deference grew up around her to such an extent that no one could explain that she needed to make Andrew speak to the FBI and she needed to remove his role far earlier than she did. Deference meant that the government kept him in good role as trade envoy way past the time anyone else who was milking it like him would have been retained.

Mums don't like to believe awful things about their sons but someone needed to grasp the nettle and get her to see a few home truths. She was tough enough with Harry wanting Half in Half out, Andrew should have been dealt with as effectively. It's sad that the end of her reign has tarnished the rest.

AreYouSureAskedNaomi · 31/01/2026 19:58

DeborahVance · 31/01/2026 19:22

That photo is genuinely shocking. To me that is clearly a child.

Horrific

A child. Someone's daughter. Horrific indeed

billysboy · 31/01/2026 20:01

As I have said before there must be so many people that saw something or thought that’s not right have enabled his behaviour and empowered his entitlement
he has no intention of helping the victims of Epstein and telling the courts anything that he knows
I speak as someone that put up with childhood abuse and violence and recognise those that stood by and turned a blind eye

canklesmctacotits · 31/01/2026 20:08

In a world of blatant and open corruption and hypocrisy at all levels - politicians, business, religious leaders, police, etc - I think I’m not alone in desperately wanting someone, anyone, to publicly denounce it all and say “enough, we can’t have this anymore”. We need leadership and absolutely nobody is showing enough decent leadership.

ohdelay · 31/01/2026 20:29

DeborahVance · 31/01/2026 19:22

That photo is genuinely shocking. To me that is clearly a child.

Horrific

The photo is disturbing. You hope she's okay whoever she is. There's a photo with her hand up which is the the only thing that makes me think she's conscious (maybe barely), but all the articles don't give her age. She's got tiny hands. Why is she on the floor like that. They must know who she is since they've redacted her face and had a lot of time to identify everyone.

AmplePlayer · 31/01/2026 20:31

'UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer suggests Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor should testify before the US Congress over his dealings with Jeffrey Epstein.' - maybe he should bring that up during his weekly meeting with KC.

CathyorClaire · 31/01/2026 20:39

MrsLeonFarrell · 31/01/2026 14:03

I have said before, and I still believed, that I think that the late Queen's long reign was harmful in terms of the institution's evolution. The monarchy needs to be able to change as society changes and it got stuck in a 1950s deference were the emphasis was on being seen rather than what you said and how you behaved when not in public.

In the age of social media image means nothing if people find you inauthentic. Sometimes the purity spiral that demands 100% perfection is stupid because, let's face it, no one can ever reach perfection but on a more achievable level the demand for authenticity is helpful. It means that people can't just say things, they have to do them. We notice when someone is saying one thing and doing another. It opens up questions about use of funds and resources.

If we are to continue as a constitutional monarchy there need to be changes and I think Andrew is experiencing one of the changes. A minor royal can no longer be seen to be supported in luxury just because of who his mum was. Appalling behaviour will have consequences, albeit probably not legal ones which I don't think it's about his royal status specifically, in terms of titles and access.

It will be interesting to see how things go in the next few years.

C3's long whispered 'changes' have evaporated even while he pockets an ever bigger slice of the cake and I have zero faith in W's appetite for significant change.

AMW is still supported in luxury (albeit downgraded) with no indication of how the cost of the apparently extensive renovations required at RL will be met in his absence while the Palace PR spin is that he's simply a banished pariah.

CathyorClaire · 31/01/2026 20:51

Miranda65 · 31/01/2026 14:33

Sandringham does not belong to the state. It belongs to the King personally, as a family home. That's the reason why AMW is going there, to be housed at the King's personal expense.

It belongs to the state having been bought with funds diverted from a Civil List fraudulently bloated by royal bleating.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread