As ever, WLM, PR disasters continued

[AtIusvue]

Online, people are pointing out that a very expensive cashmere jumper that Meg wore on suits, also made its way to her wardrobe

It’s been nothing but PR disasters of late.

What I have noticed which is curious - is that the UK tabloids are not running with P6 story about the dress. Just like they avoided talking about the NY car chase. They only reported on the media frenzy. But, we know Harry sent out some sort of memo not to publish photos etc. None of the UK press did. Now Meg has acknowledged the stolen dress story and released an official refute ….and none of the UK press are even reporting on that?

That’s weird. They will literally print any old Meg story to get clicks…..but not this one???

The articles on this issue are mainly American.

Indeed, that's really doubling down on the capitalising of titles, albeit on the part of a fan, not by MM herself.

Also, MM apparently owns a pregnant Kelly Zajfen: "The Duchess of Duchess took this beautiful photograph of her pregnant Kelly Zajfen" - probably not widely available, those Kelly Zajfens.

I know this is not MM posting, just one of her fans... but 😁

Yes , it was very funny! 🤣

If she does any alterations , I trust she will be criticised the way Catherine was ?

Doubtful, all h and m photos have been altered but apparently it’s not a problem now! 🤷‍♀️

I really don’t understand posts like this! Why wish for anyone to be criticised? Especially about clothing!

Where are people talking about altering clothing @Thewolffromthedoor89 - i think they're talking about photos

It is pretty much giving Single. White. Female. vibes at this stage.

Apologies! I withdraw my last sentence!

I read the last posts far too quickly.

I still don’t understand anyone wishing for someone else to be criticised though!

That won’t happen because she has a freakish attention for detail. (I say this in jest but I still can’t believe sources ‘close’ to her happily joined in the SM pile on Catherine shortly after her cancer diagnosis.)

Highly unlikely, since it hasn't happened with any of the digitally altered photos she's released so far.

Meghan branded salmonella sussex 🤣🤣https://x.com/nypost/status/1995150942291779828?s=46

Well, at least they used Sussex, she can’t complain about that!

<a class="break-all" href="https://archive.vn/2025.11.30-065900/www.dailymail.co.uk/lifestyle/article-15335757/Why-breaking-Prince-Harry-best-thing-happened-Chelsy-Davy-SARAH-RAINEY-reveals-shes-never-happier-hated-Montecito-madness.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://archive.vn/2025.11.30-065900/www.dailymail.co.uk/lifestyle/article-15335757/Why-breaking-Prince-Harry-best-thing-happened-Chelsy-Davy-SARAH-RAINEY-reveals-shes-never-happier-hated-Montecito-madness.html

this seems a rather odd article for the dm and I doubt that Meghan will like it ! And I would not blame her one bit.

Also ..apparently the dm have printed a story about Meghan copying Catherine with Charlie mackesie , that I posted about earlier!! Very odd , do they troll sm for stories?
sorry no link .

It's been all over the internet since she posted the picture at Thanksgiving - on Friday. The artwork for the Boy, the Mole, the Fox and the Horse is very well known - even I recognised it when I saw the post on Friday from seeing the BBC ads for the cartoon adaptation several years ago.

I think it was also problematic that she didn't acknowledge the source so many of her fans seem to be under the impression that the drawings are her own original artwork.

Cheers , I didn’t mean me or here by the way, I too saw it on sm and wondered if they troll for articles 👍

Yes agree - what prompted this (comments are amusing) ….. I wonder if there will be a MM clap back in the next week or so with some smoochy / hot fox drivel.

They run articles about either Chelsy or, oh goodness I've gone blank and can't remember his other girlfriend's name, anyway, they run articles like that fairly regularly. If Harry and Meghan have any sense they'll ignore them.

Cressida Bonas .
There are lots of regurgitated articles at the moment . I can’t decide if it’s to keep H and M in the news or if there’s a bigger story simmering that we don’t yet know about . The latter was a suggestion made by a friend’s journalist daughter who seems to think there could be some big story coming .

Another H&M story? Or, as I suspect, more Andrew/Sarah stuff?

Sorry , no idea @CurlewKate. I did ask but she simply shrugged !

I do kind of wish the DofS had stayed with Chelsy. Ir would have been fun imagining TLQ and the DofE practising saying the name without curling a lip….

It seems to have been a response to Chelsy posting pictures of her wedding (IIRC in 2022) on her Instagram a few days ago.

Meghan must suspect her days as a duchess are numbered. Here's why...
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/royals/article-15323269/Meghan-duchess-days-numbered-theory-royal-title.html?ito=native_share_article-nativemenubutton
another article! Are they ramping up because of the court case?

a review of Meghans jam and opening, it’s not sealed properly!