Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

"He loves me so boldly...." - Haarpers Interview with Meghan

1000 replies

Phase42 · 20/11/2025 09:53

https://www.harpersbazaar.com/culture/film-tv/a69289143/meghan-markle-cover-story-interview-2025/

She's a beautiful woman but i can't understand why she just doesn't drop the titles and be herself. And it's odd how she talks about how much 'H' loves her but not how much she loves him.

Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex, Meets Her Moment

After years of being subsumed by other people’s narratives, she's ready to author her own next chapter

https://www.harpersbazaar.com/culture/film-tv/a69289143/meghan-markle-cover-story-interview-2025/

OP posts:
Thread gallery
26
chunkyBoo · 25/11/2025 09:17

jeffgoldblum · 25/11/2025 08:32

The video of the pair of them practically climbing and knocking chairs out of the way to walk in front of Edward and Sophie is a classic!
both hilarious and horrifying in it’s display of bad manners and ego.

That was hilariously cringey

JSMill · 25/11/2025 10:41

jeffgoldblum · 25/11/2025 08:32

The video of the pair of them practically climbing and knocking chairs out of the way to walk in front of Edward and Sophie is a classic!
both hilarious and horrifying in it’s display of bad manners and ego.

That was hilarious. What was ridiculous as well was that they had had a tantrum about not being in the procession and were only placated when K and W agreed not to be in it. I think that shows how much it bothered them that K and W were treated differently to them.

sequinpanties · 25/11/2025 11:09

jeffgoldblum · 25/11/2025 08:32

The video of the pair of them practically climbing and knocking chairs out of the way to walk in front of Edward and Sophie is a classic!
both hilarious and horrifying in it’s display of bad manners and ego.

This is a classic. It's like a Carry On!

sequinpanties · 25/11/2025 11:19

A time she wants to fondly remember ?

AtIusvue · 25/11/2025 11:20

From the comments section on Page Six:

‘This is classic Meghan Markle clapback when confronted on her maladjusted behaviour. If she feels the NYP is inaccurate in their reporting about the alleged thefts she does have a legal remedy. If she feels she has been defamed she can commence legal action. She never sued any of the multiple outlets who reported on her alleged horrendous bullying nor did she sue Tom Bower or Valentine Low. The Hollywood Reporter had a dozen signed affidavits to back up their claims. Markle will huff and puff and deny stealing anything but the one thing she will not do is sue. Why? She knows what is being reported is accurate, she would never survive discovery, and she also knows the NYP have sources which verify their reporting. The NYP would not have run with this if they could not verify the claims. Markle is a sticky fingered low-life. People with ethics and morals know you do not keep things which do not belong to you.’

It’s true. The NYP/p6 have been running headlines saying she stole the dresses. She hasn’t sued. This is what happens when you’re trigger happy with lawsuits….then don’t sue over stories that you bully staff and steal clothing. Makes you look guilty.

Lunde · 25/11/2025 11:21

jeffgoldblum · 25/11/2025 08:32

The video of the pair of them practically climbing and knocking chairs out of the way to walk in front of Edward and Sophie is a classic!
both hilarious and horrifying in it’s display of bad manners and ego.

That was funny.

As was the bit at the same event where Meghan found the cameras (she always manages to do this) and gives the cameras her huge rictus smile, but Sophie catches her and gives her "the stare"

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/1Z26jmbPtlE

Before you continue to YouTube

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/1Z26jmbPtlE

AtIusvue · 25/11/2025 11:22

This was at the end of the article

‘We have reached out to reps for Markle. Reps for Variety and The Cut did not respond to request for comment.’

So there could have been items she took from the Cut shoot also. I thought it was just the Variety shoot.

AtIusvue · 25/11/2025 11:24

Oh the Chanel dress was the Cut. It was £8000 by the way! Imagine just thinking you can take it without paying. The audacity.

BasiliskStare · 25/11/2025 11:28

AtIusvue · 25/11/2025 11:22

This was at the end of the article

‘We have reached out to reps for Markle. Reps for Variety and The Cut did not respond to request for comment.’

So there could have been items she took from the Cut shoot also. I thought it was just the Variety shoot.

That Page 6 article also reference a Chanel dress she wore as part of an article in the Cut which she was afterwards seen out and about in.

Anyway it's all nonsense I can't believe even she believes people believe it. She is not required to curate / preserve her wardrobe. She's not really Royal. I doubt KP would have one of their "royal dresses" exhibitions about her

I just thinks she likes something for nothing and probably rightly assumes no-one will challenge her on taking stuff. The more gracious way to have done it would be to offer to buy it. Some will take a heavy handed hint and give it to her , some might say - yes is $x

BigWillyLittleTodger · 25/11/2025 11:30

Markle is a sticky fingered low-life.

Isn’t she just, plus the shoes she allegedly pinched from the Reitmans campaign. Waits for the superfans to defend her thieving…. no doubt they will!

Lunde · 25/11/2025 11:34

AtIusvue · 25/11/2025 11:15

Meghan is actually attempting to pass of her taking dresses from phosphors as something she must do as a Royal, to go in the archives 😂

That doesn’t stop you paying for them Meghan, which you know is protocol!

https://archive.ph/gDlma

https://pagesix.com/2025/11/24/royal-family/meghan-markle-kept-1700-fashion-shoot-dress-for-her-royal-archive-source/

They got caught red handed and are now trying to say this is what royals do!

She was well known for stealing stuff from photo shoots.

When she was a jobbing actress she allegedly stole a pair a Aquazzura shoes from a Reitman's catalogue/advert shoot and which turned up in her engagement shoot to Prince Harry.

The Royals pay for their clothes - it was one of the issues that the KP staff had with Meghan that she was stuck in that D-list celebrity mindset that you keep or sell any gifts. This caused issues when she kept the blood diamonds as they needed to be returned.

There were also rumours that she used to sell a lot of her clothes via friends and pocket the money. Charles paid around £750,000 for her clothing in the 18 months she was in the royal family and most of those pieces were never seen again.

MrsLeonFarrell · 25/11/2025 11:36

I'm sure I've read that the late Queen used to pass on outfits.

As usual Meghan has the wrong end of the stick. Royals archive significant outfits, wedding dresses, and things worn for significant occasions. A photoshoot for the fifth in line to the throne's wife hardly qualifies as significant

AtIusvue · 25/11/2025 11:46

I’d love to know where she’s storing her archived dresses…..are they stored as part of the Royal Collection at a Royal Palace?

Or are they in a spare room above the garage, along with boxes of jam, copies of the Bench and Spare and a frightened intern hiding amongst the rails.

ThePoshUns · 25/11/2025 12:04

This post on X made me chuckle

‘Just off to Waitrose to royally archive a few bits for dinner’

NormaMajors1992coat · 25/11/2025 12:19

Can’t believe she is trying to pass off stealing as something she just had to go along with as a member of the RF. Nothing is ever, ever their fault, is it?

Bullying: not my fault if I’m a demanding boss, not my job to coddle people

Accusations of racism: not us, it was the British press

Dressing as a Nazi: W+C made me do it

Using racist slurs: I didn’t know they were racist due to my upbringing

All those lies in Spare: my truth is as valid as the truth

Vexatious litigation: nobody told me I might lose

Announcing Canada trip to detract from William in Brazil: not my fault, it’s because I’m not given security like other working royals

Having herself announced to an empty room: not me, just completely normal royal protocol

Insisting the Kardashians removed the party photos: it was a lackey and also only to appease the king

Signing with Netflix, who at the time were busy dramatising Diana’s mental health and death for entertainment: I had to because my father cut me off

Stealing clothes: the RF said I had to

And on and on and on. There is something so repugnant about grown adults, especially ones in such a position of privilege, refusing to take responsibility for their own actions. Awful people.

Bigcat25 · 25/11/2025 12:29

sickofsixseven · 25/11/2025 06:16

The worst incident was in South Africa when she looked visibly bored, and turned her back on the woman telling her emotional story of being a child bride, being infected with hiv, and losing her child. She was practically rolling her eyes that this woman was daring to speak and ruin her photo op with some children. Beyond rude, and just complete disdain. Abhorrent behaviour, especially from someone who calls herself a humanitarian. Showed who she really is.

That is absolutely horrible. She's so heartless. The speach she did on the stump was also awful, talking about being a royal and a sister and loving them. Of course she doesn't love them. She left, did nothing for them, and never gave them another thought. Love is big, it comes with obligations.

Jaffna · 25/11/2025 12:34

Bigcat25 · 25/11/2025 12:29

That is absolutely horrible. She's so heartless. The speach she did on the stump was also awful, talking about being a royal and a sister and loving them. Of course she doesn't love them. She left, did nothing for them, and never gave them another thought. Love is big, it comes with obligations.

Is that the same trip where she did the doe-eyed fakery with the journalist - “No one has asked if I am OK…”

Jaffna · 25/11/2025 12:36

I bet Jessica Mulroney is pissing herself.

chunkyBoo · 25/11/2025 12:44

Honestly re the stealing, if someone got caught they’d be in court and possibly jailed, at least a record for theft … I hope those fashion houses press
charges or at least black list her

Bigcat25 · 25/11/2025 12:48

Jaffna · 25/11/2025 12:34

Is that the same trip where she did the doe-eyed fakery with the journalist - “No one has asked if I am OK…”

Yes it is. One of the most shocking things she's ever done. She's utterly self obbessed and clueless. She was lucky that her behavior on this trip didn't get more negative attention.

chunkyBoo · 25/11/2025 12:56

Bigcat25 · 25/11/2025 12:48

Yes it is. One of the most shocking things she's ever done. She's utterly self obbessed and clueless. She was lucky that her behavior on this trip didn't get more negative attention.

I do think though that this is a time point where people stood back and said ‘wait … What?!?’ About Megain, things continued to go south I think from there, the bullshit about Africans dancing in the streets like when Nelson Mandela was freed, the airline captain kneeling at her feet thanking her for her service (if I recall that correctly) and all that bullshit about ‘our truth’ …. They have a very unhealthy obsession with re-writing the truth to make their fairytale/make them look glowing and everyone else is the villain … most of the world sees through their bollox

My2cents1975 · 25/11/2025 13:12

BasiliskStare · 25/11/2025 11:28

That Page 6 article also reference a Chanel dress she wore as part of an article in the Cut which she was afterwards seen out and about in.

Anyway it's all nonsense I can't believe even she believes people believe it. She is not required to curate / preserve her wardrobe. She's not really Royal. I doubt KP would have one of their "royal dresses" exhibitions about her

I just thinks she likes something for nothing and probably rightly assumes no-one will challenge her on taking stuff. The more gracious way to have done it would be to offer to buy it. Some will take a heavy handed hint and give it to her , some might say - yes is $x

Even worse, the staff are now exposed to criminal liability...possession of stolen property. And given the Chanel dress is valued at over $1,000 it now enters Class E felony territory in New York (actually could be a class D felony as that Chanel dress retails for over $3,000).

If M claims that the staff, did it, the staff may be stitched up for the theft itself, leading to more charges.

Felony means severe fines and even jail time...see Martha Stewart.

jeffgoldblum · 25/11/2025 13:36

MaturingCheeseball · 25/11/2025 08:57

The Uvalde visit was the worst. Shocking.

No wonder M turned down all the Palace offerings of help -Sophie, equerries etc - given that the whole time she was being steered by Sunshine Sachs. Reports were that she was apprehended going round filming with her phone. The rf really let a fox into the hen house there although they were in a cleft stick, as banning the marriage would have left them wide open to accusations of racism.

As it was, M&H were able to profit from the BLM wave with the “skin colour” mike drop and then collecting their anti-racism award.

Yes the award for challenging racism in the royal family they accepted before Harry then turned around and denied they called the rf racist on tv and blamed it on the media!!! 😡

jeffgoldblum · 25/11/2025 13:43

BigWillyLittleTodger · 25/11/2025 11:30

Markle is a sticky fingered low-life.

Isn’t she just, plus the shoes she allegedly pinched from the Reitmans campaign. Waits for the superfans to defend her thieving…. no doubt they will!

Edited

Oh yes ! There is one fan who was so upset she has followed me all over the board to call me a liar for mentioning the stealing of the dresses! 🙄🤣

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.