Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family
Thread gallery
24
BigWillyLittleTodger · 07/11/2025 11:36

Thedom · 07/11/2025 11:33

Yes @Indianrollerbird, that is what is crazy and fascinating, I can’t think of any other celebrity who got to launch their new business with a Netflix show and despite that massive push, it’s still a damp squib.

Wonder will we see product placement in her movie cameo appearance.

Edited

Yes it’s incredible that with her platform she ends up with a stand in the local bookshop!

AtIusvue · 07/11/2025 11:36

jumpingthehighjump · 07/11/2025 11:33

None of them care about the York situation either

Yeah....that's why I've read the Lownie book on the House of York twice, and have contributed hundreds of posts about Andrew, Sarah, the daughters, the legal position, what is happening in the US as far as release of the Epstein files (government lockdown needs to end so the new Democratic senator who won end Sept can be sworn in and her vote will release the files)
I have linked scores of articles, a very interesting one this morning in fact, on another thread

But apparently I don't care about the York situation.... 🥱🥺

Stick to the York threads

OP posts:
AtIusvue · 07/11/2025 11:37

The Yorks have nothing to do with Megs movie career. Read the title.

OP posts:
BigWillyLittleTodger · 07/11/2025 11:37

Thanks Jeff! I think this thread is a prime example of what you have listed.

jumpingthehighjump · 07/11/2025 11:38

jeffgoldblum · 07/11/2025 11:35

You of all people should know (as you are on most of them) that there is currently 15 threads trending about Andrew and Sarah compared to the 2 ( or 3 if you count the one started by a fan) about h and m , so posting those posts on this thread is completely unnecessary and a complete derailment.

Edited

I only picked up on something the poster said, and answered, sorry it offended you.
Report my post if you so wish.
You of all people know you can

jumpingthehighjump · 07/11/2025 11:41

AtIusvue · 07/11/2025 11:36

Stick to the York threads

When a poster asserts that posters who don't dislike Meghan also don't care about the York situation, I am quite entitled to prove that that is not true in my case.
Thanks

AtIusvue · 07/11/2025 11:42

jumpingthehighjump · 07/11/2025 11:41

When a poster asserts that posters who don't dislike Meghan also don't care about the York situation, I am quite entitled to prove that that is not true in my case.
Thanks

No you’re derailing and not posting in good faith.

Go over to the endless York threads and endlessly whinge over there.

OP posts:
jeffgoldblum · 07/11/2025 11:42

jumpingthehighjump · 07/11/2025 11:38

I only picked up on something the poster said, and answered, sorry it offended you.
Report my post if you so wish.
You of all people know you can

Yes but I only report posts if really necessary and only if they are a personal attack on a poster.
because surprisingly I would rather not get somebody banned.

Wellthatsacharlingknot · 07/11/2025 11:44

(Edited (quote didn’t work)
this is in reply to poster who brought up the point about looking back at Sarah Ferguson’s activities in hindsight. Can’t find post right atm.)

As Andrew Lownie pointed out, SF was living a half-in, half-out lifestyle for thirty years, while living in Andrew’s house!

And yet when Harry and Meghan asked to do the same, transparently and above board, their request was turned down.

Harry is outside of the RF now so I don’t see how Meghan going back to her former profession of acting@; qualifies as making money off her royal status? If anything , it signifies a move away from her lifestyle projects, which would surely qualify as a good thing in your eyes?

Anyway, lots of minor royals have been making money off their royal status for years;

eg Peter Phillips sold photos of his 2008 wedding to Autumn Kelly to Hello! for an estimated £500,000.

Was he criticised as much as Meghan?

And it’s all a nonsense as the main players benefit financially from their royal status all of the time! Don’t tell me they pay full price for their fleet of Range Rovers or anything that is deemed by royal appointment ?

If a minor royal figure by marriage - and then divorce - such as Sarah Ferguson got away with not paying her Harrods bill for years; think of what the main players in the RF are allowed to get away with!

jumpingthehighjump · 07/11/2025 11:44

AtIusvue · 07/11/2025 11:42

No you’re derailing and not posting in good faith.

Go over to the endless York threads and endlessly whinge over there.

I am disputing something someone stated as fact.
I am quite entitled to do that
Maybe the poster concerned shouldn't make incorrect sweeping statements, and I would not have answered

Indianrollerbird · 07/11/2025 11:44

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

AtIusvue · 07/11/2025 11:46

jumpingthehighjump · 07/11/2025 11:44

I am disputing something someone stated as fact.
I am quite entitled to do that
Maybe the poster concerned shouldn't make incorrect sweeping statements, and I would not have answered

No you are causing arguments and derailing.

OP posts:
jumpingthehighjump · 07/11/2025 11:46

Yes I agree with you for once. When someone shows you who they are just believe it

Lifestooshort71 · 07/11/2025 11:47

People might not like Meghan’s projects but at least she works hard off her own back and is paying a fair amount of tax on her earnings! If someone is willing to pay her for an acting role , then I cannot for the life of me see one problem with her accepting the job, however many people like to bleat on about it on here!
Totally agree, she always picks herself up and finds something else to have a go at. I seem to remember QE2 suggested she carried on acting and perhaps the time's come to give it a go. Not a fan but can still hope it goes well for her.

jumpingthehighjump · 07/11/2025 11:47

So I have to accept a totally incorrect assertion?
Bizarre

Indianrollerbird · 07/11/2025 11:48

Wellthatsacharlingknot · 07/11/2025 11:44

(Edited (quote didn’t work)
this is in reply to poster who brought up the point about looking back at Sarah Ferguson’s activities in hindsight. Can’t find post right atm.)

As Andrew Lownie pointed out, SF was living a half-in, half-out lifestyle for thirty years, while living in Andrew’s house!

And yet when Harry and Meghan asked to do the same, transparently and above board, their request was turned down.

Harry is outside of the RF now so I don’t see how Meghan going back to her former profession of acting@; qualifies as making money off her royal status? If anything , it signifies a move away from her lifestyle projects, which would surely qualify as a good thing in your eyes?

Anyway, lots of minor royals have been making money off their royal status for years;

eg Peter Phillips sold photos of his 2008 wedding to Autumn Kelly to Hello! for an estimated £500,000.

Was he criticised as much as Meghan?

And it’s all a nonsense as the main players benefit financially from their royal status all of the time! Don’t tell me they pay full price for their fleet of Range Rovers or anything that is deemed by royal appointment ?

If a minor royal figure by marriage - and then divorce - such as Sarah Ferguson got away with not paying her Harrods bill for years; think of what the main players in the RF are allowed to get away with!

Edited

Meghan can go and act her little socks off, and sell candles smelling of her essence until the cows come home. But not using royal titles and royal status, in my opinion. If you don't like the behaviour of the Yorks and the other minor royals in trading off their connections, then there's no reason to give the Sussexes a pass, is there.

OnePeachDreamer · 07/11/2025 11:48

Interesting thread. IMO Meghan gets a lot of free publicity for whatever she's associated with. So amazon/Prime have to be ecstatic with the free publicity for their little movie. No matter how small the cameo is, millions in UK will (hate) watch a movie that would have gone completely under the radar otherwise. And there will be endless articles from now until the movie comes out. You couldn't pay for that kind of continuous publicity.

AtIusvue · 07/11/2025 11:49

Millions in the UK won’t watch. Millions in the UK didn’t even watch her WLM series, never mind a bit part.

OP posts:
kirinm · 07/11/2025 11:51

MrsZiggywinkle · 06/11/2025 08:56

Sigh, I just wish she would go away somewhere, anywhere….. I don’t really care where just out of the public gaze.

I manage not to see or hear anything about her. So why is it that you do? Is it because you purposely go look for it? Why shouldn’t she earn an income?!

BigWillyLittleTodger · 07/11/2025 11:52

AtIusvue · 07/11/2025 11:49

Millions in the UK won’t watch. Millions in the UK didn’t even watch her WLM series, never mind a bit part.

Why would anyone bother to watch a whole film when they can just watch YouTubers reactions instead! Much more interesting!

Indianrollerbird · 07/11/2025 11:55

OnePeachDreamer · 07/11/2025 11:48

Interesting thread. IMO Meghan gets a lot of free publicity for whatever she's associated with. So amazon/Prime have to be ecstatic with the free publicity for their little movie. No matter how small the cameo is, millions in UK will (hate) watch a movie that would have gone completely under the radar otherwise. And there will be endless articles from now until the movie comes out. You couldn't pay for that kind of continuous publicity.

This might happen, as I said above. However, hate watching bumping viewing figures only benefits Meghan if she's making serious money at producer level.

I think the film is only just being made now, isn't it? There's no guarantee that Meghan's part will even be in the final cut, although her involvement being leaked to the press makes it harder for the producers to drop her walk on, which might also be a stroke of genius on her part.

chunkyBoo · 07/11/2025 11:55

jumpingthehighjump · 07/11/2025 10:32

There really should be a Uni degree course about Meghan
You'd all get Firsts!
😂🤣

Now that really would be the epitome of Micky mouse degrees!!

OnePeachDreamer · 07/11/2025 11:57

BigWillyLittleTodger · 07/11/2025 11:52

Why would anyone bother to watch a whole film when they can just watch YouTubers reactions instead! Much more interesting!

Yes you can do that if that's what you find interesting

bubzie · 07/11/2025 11:58

chunkyBoo · 07/11/2025 11:55

Now that really would be the epitome of Micky mouse degrees!!

It would be a short part time day release one 😂

bubzie · 07/11/2025 12:02

Wellthatsacharlingknot · 07/11/2025 11:02

Yes agree that there is absolute no harm in Meghan taking on an acting cameo if she wants. It’s her business alone which career decisions she makes as she is a private individual and we the tax payer do not fund her activities.

There are absolutely no legitimate grounds on which to criticise her for it.

There are much more serious things happening within the royal family atm but the usual protagonists are saying “don’t look there, look over here!” .

We can discuss whatever we want though - no matter how trivial it is.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.