(Edited (quote didn’t work)
this is in reply to poster who brought up the point about looking back at Sarah Ferguson’s activities in hindsight. Can’t find post right atm.)
As Andrew Lownie pointed out, SF was living a half-in, half-out lifestyle for thirty years, while living in Andrew’s house!
And yet when Harry and Meghan asked to do the same, transparently and above board, their request was turned down.
Harry is outside of the RF now so I don’t see how Meghan going back to her former profession of acting@; qualifies as making money off her royal status? If anything , it signifies a move away from her lifestyle projects, which would surely qualify as a good thing in your eyes?
Anyway, lots of minor royals have been making money off their royal status for years;
eg Peter Phillips sold photos of his 2008 wedding to Autumn Kelly to Hello! for an estimated £500,000.
Was he criticised as much as Meghan?
And it’s all a nonsense as the main players benefit financially from their royal status all of the time! Don’t tell me they pay full price for their fleet of Range Rovers or anything that is deemed by royal appointment ?
If a minor royal figure by marriage - and then divorce - such as Sarah Ferguson got away with not paying her Harrods bill for years; think of what the main players in the RF are allowed to get away with!