Meghan's back in the movies

[AtIusvue]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-15262991/Meghan-Markle-return-acting-Hollywood-new-film.html

@Indianrollerbird oh I am very interested in them, not just as a hater.

Who cares! Why do you care if I care?

It won't affect you what’s that got to do with anything? Does every subject matter have to affect posters personally before they can have an opinion? Didn’t realise that was in the talk guidelines

You can choose to ignore the whole thing if you so wanted You can choose to ignore me, other posters and this board completely if you wanted to, but you have as much interest in the subject as all of us because here you are.

To repeat...I am not upset or livid

I am gobsmacked ...that's the word I'd use!!!
Absolutely gobsmacked someone would go to the lengths of monitoring stock levels of Meghan's products.
That is not attacking for me saying that!

But you haven't read anything about them, listened to/read any of their interviews, watched any of their shows, because none of that is for you? You can't be that interested then, can you?

Agree with your credibility point in general Spectre8! I think monarchists are deliberately posting lots of negative threads about Meghan right now in order to counteract the shit show that is happening with Andrew and Fergie; all of which has implications for the rest of the family!

For example, how they all covered up for his perversions and financial misdemeanours for decades?

And how Edward has extended his lease with a peppercorn rent too for his £30 million mansion and yet barely does the same level of work as a very part time boiler repair man. (A pt boiler repair man would actually work much harder!) Apparently the lease was extended recently so his children will be able to live on the same cushy terms, despite it being said that they are being brought up to have real jobs? Nothing against the dc themselves as they are not responsible, but this example is typical of the spin the RF put on things!

At least Sophie does some work; but enough to justify a £30 million pound house on a peppercorn rent? I think not! How much of the maintenance does the tax payer contribute to I wonder?

I’d rather have Meghan any day who is unapologetically and blatantly hustling, actively trying to make a buck, which is why she left the RF in the first place, rather than the RF who hide behind smoke and mirrors, with very favourable tax arrangements, pretending to serve the people, while in reality serving their own bank accounts!

People are trying to make out that Harry and Meghan are running out of money as though that is a shameful thing; I don’t think they are btw, but isn’t it actually a good thing that they have to earn money for themselves? Unlike William or Charles who will never experience a financial worry in their lifetime, as they each have £20 profits annually from the Duchies to divide up, which is incidentally not subject to corporation tax, despite the duchies being enormous commercial operations? And this is profits from assets you would think would be publically owned anyway, such as wind farms on our coast line? And land rented out to the NHS and the British army?

People might not like Meghan’s projects but at least she works hard off her own back and is paying a fair amount of tax on her earnings! If someone is willing to pay her for an acting role , then I cannot for the life of me see one problem with her accepting the job, however many people like to bleat on about it on here! Their protests are very obviously strategic!

Please explain why you called the poster angry.

Why is it surprising that Meghan's stock levels are being examined, when Meghan herself has obsessively talked about her stock levels in her many interviews?

Question about IMDb to knowledgable people please - are entries updated by the person/their PR people, or does the site itself have people who do it?

It’s quite fascinating to see how little impact her global recognition and her high profile PR events have had on interest in her business or any of her ventures, really. Wonder if she will be back doing commercials again.

TRAFFIC SOURCES
Direct: 45% of traffic or 89.4K visits are from people who type "asever.com" into their browser window

Organic: 30% of traffic or 59.2K visits are from people who find her on a search engine, either by searching for her or search terms like "jam", etc

Paid: .02% This means she is doing almost no paid marketing to have asever advertisements pop up on google, or no one is clicking. It being so low, almost zero, makes me think she is not doing paid marketing campaigns.

Referrals: 10.82% or 21.3 K visits. This is all traffic coming from a magazine article or a forum. 33% of referrals are from People. The rest is from Saleforce software, maybe someone can fill us in on what that means. Last month 25% of referred traffic was from Lipstick Alley, but it doesn't even get a mention this month. Are the Sugars losing their interest?

Display: 1.15%. The amount of traffic that comes from visual ads, such as banner ads. Again, showing her marketing budget for advertising is very low.

Social Media: 12.45% or 24.5 K visitors come from social media. 86% of this is from Insta, 13% from X, and 0.52% from TikTok
AND FINALLY:
*Email: .*06% or 118 visits are from her email list. Often, email has higher click through rates because these are your hardest core fans. But hers is abysmally low. Either very few people signed up for her list or her email marketing is abysmal.

Yes agree that there is absolute no harm in Meghan taking on an acting cameo if she wants. It’s her business alone which career decisions she makes as she is a private individual and we the tax payer do not fund her activities.

There are absolutely no legitimate grounds on which to criticise her for it.

There are much more serious things happening within the royal family atm but the usual protagonists are saying “don’t look there, look over here!” .

Very well said.

She’s not really returning to acting though, is she? She’s playing herself.

Would you say the same thing about Sarah Ferguson 25 years ago if you had a crystal ball?

Meghan's only selling point is her royal title, and boy does she use it to make money and garner political influence at every given opportunity.

@Wellthatsacharlingknot
What a great post, agree 100%
And whilst we're on the subject of the Yorks, and the rest of them, why the hell do B&E have grace and favour apartments in Kensington Palace. They're not working Royals. That means H&M could have one!
What a thought!
The royal board would combust🤣

As I've said Meghan is perfectly at liberty to take an acting role, hope she enjoys it!

In all the years on here , two threads only started both in august and neither about m and h 🤷‍♀️

There are much more serious things happening within the royal family atm but the usual protagonists are saying “don’t look there, look over here!” .

I haven't noticed anyone saying we shouldn't discuss the other issues the RF are having - there are multiple threads on the current issues.

Interestingly, one of the people most vocal in denouncing those of us who criticised the Duchess of Sussex's behaviour on another thread was nowhere to be seen on any of the threads about the former Duke of York.

There isn’t ‘someone’!

it’s available information from paid organizations that influencers, companies and brands etc. use to track online engagement metrics. It’s crucial for any company to track their own metrics and the metrics of their competitors.

To answer your question @BigWillyLittleTodger, yes sort of ! Awhile ago mn informed us that goady and derailing posts were now against talk guidelines. And if reported and mn find they are crossing those boundaries and also appear to be a personal attack on the op , they will be deleted.

Good attempt at trying to make groundless criticisms appear legitimate op!

I know plenty of women, myself included, who think they will not continue with their former careers after having children, and go back to doing it anyway! It’s not a crime to change your mind!

And it’s not a crime to want to make more money! It’s not a crime to find yourself having less money than you anticipated or need. Life doesn’t always go the way you want it, At least Meghan is earning it legitimately and paying tax on the income!

I would rather save my criticisms for people who commit actual crimes and so called respectable people who pay the minimum income tax but conveniently don’t declare how much and who are able to hide their wealth and wills from the public eye and evade paying capital gains tax! And who are warned in advance by Parliament whenever discussion of their finances is about to happen, so they can lobby against it!

We all know why members of the RF don’t have to do anything as “vulgar” as work for a living! And the reasons are not terribly edifying or noble however people like to spin it!

To answer your question @BigWillyLittleTodger, yes sort of ! Awhile ago mn informed us that goady and derailing posts were now against talk guidelines. And if reported and mn find they are crossing those boundaries and also appear to be a personal attack on the op , they will be deleted.

Thank you for posting that, it's pretty fascinating how these things work. I'd love a marketing powerhouse to give us their take in view of Meghan's assertion that she wants to make her brand global. I wonder what someone like Emma Grede would make of it, in view of her work turning the Kardashian Skims brand into a billion dollar enterprise. It seems to be a pretty poor show for Meghan, considering she had Netflix as her "partner".

None of them care about the York situation either

Yeah....that's why I've read the Lownie book on the House of York twice, and have contributed hundreds of posts about Andrew, Sarah, the daughters, the legal position, what is happening in the US as far as release of the Epstein files (government lockdown needs to end so the new Democratic senator who won end Sept can be sworn in and her vote will release the files)
I have linked scores of articles, a very interesting one this morning in fact, on another thread

But apparently I don't care about the York situation.... 🥱🥺

Yes @Indianrollerbird, that is what is crazy and fascinating, I can’t think of any other celebrity who got to launch their new business with a Netflix show and despite that massive push, it’s still a damp squib.

Wonder will we see product placement in her movie cameo appearance.

You of all people should know (as you are on most of them) that there is currently 15 threads trending about Andrew and Sarah compared to the 2 ( or 3 if you count the one started by a fan) about h and m , so posting those posts on this thread is completely unnecessary and a complete derailment.