And speaking of Andrew; there is so much more to say and find out; eg how much did the late QE2 and the then Prince Charles know, who in the RF was responsible for covering up his illegal activities carried out by him when he was funded by tax-payers and acting as trade envoy, even when proof was brought to them by diplomats and politicians and complaints had been made about him in the FO, what did Andrew give in return for the money he received in murky deals with dodgy international businessmen, ditto the Chinese spy, where is he getting the money to pay for Royal Lodge now, should he face charges for his corrupt behaviour, when can this be discussed in the H of C, should the RF continue to be responsible for managing their own finances without more outside checks and more transparency and accountability, to name but a few subjects for discussion?
And what new insight have you added to any of these matters in your discussions? Why should I talk to you about these things when I can watch Andrew Lownie discussing them all over UK news outlets?
I want to know about his Crown Estates lease. Do you have a copy? Do you know what's in it? Do you understand leasehold law? Have you ever conducted a court procedure to evict someone on a long lease? If not, what's the point in talking to you?
What do you know about the cover up by the Queen/KC? What are your insights that advance that conversation?
What information so you have about Andrew's time as a trade envoy over and above that which Andrew Lownie tried and failed to obtain on FOI? Do you know anyone in the DTI who can spill the beans to you? How do you advance the knowledge about his activities in your discussions?
What am I getting from spending my time talking to you or anyone else about these things? I've already been on a couple of threads, I don't think the discussion you want has progressed since those ones I posted on. People are asking all the same questions you are asking above, and nobody is giving you any answers. So how does talking to you about Prince Andrew advance my understanding and why should I spend my time on it, when I can put a podcast of Andrew Lownie on and hear from an expert on the matter?
And most reasonable people see through it and understand that even now, all of these years on, criticism of MM is being used as a useful distraction away from pertinent questions being asked about whether some key members of RF see themselves as above the law?
Why are you distracted by discussion of MM? I can hold many thoughts in my head at once, and I can discuss many, many topics in a single day. If I discuss MM, I don't automatically forget everything else. What's wrong with you that this is the effect on you? How is the news cycle ignoring Andrew in favour of Meghan's latest instagram reel? I haven't noticed the latter trumping the former on BBC news or any other MSM, have you?
Just finding yourself of the same opinion as Piers Morgan should normally be enough for people to question themselves surely?
If you are so offended by Piers Morgan's views, I suggest you stop watching him. I don't, because I don't care for the man. If you measure your opinions and moral compass by what a media gobshite might/does believe, then I am afraid that makes you a bit of a lemming. I form my own opinions.