I find this post both typical and extraordinary!
I know the regular critics of the Sussexes genuinely believe themselves to be
“informed, inquiring, polite, and literate”
but in all honesty, speaking as a poster who when posting generally across Mumsnet, tries quite hard not to insult people, I have never come across more goading, condescension and closed minds than when on the royal threads.
Most people out in the rational world do think it is surprising that MM is still appearing in the headlines of many tabloids and as the subject of many podcasts, is still written and spoken about by the usual culprits, even though there is, contrary to the very convenient rhetoric on here, so much to discuss about Andrew. The invective waged against her is obsessive and disproportionate.
Just finding yourself of the same opinion as Piers Morgan should normally be enough for people to question themselves surely?
And speaking of Andrew; there is so much more to say and find out; eg how much did the late QE2 and the then Prince Charles know, who in the RF was responsible for covering up his illegal activities carried out by him when he was funded by tax-payers and acting as trade envoy, even when proof was brought to them by diplomats and politicians and complaints had been made about him in the FO, what did Andrew give in return for the money he received in murky deals with dodgy international businessmen, ditto the Chinese spy, where is he getting the money to pay for Royal Lodge now, should he face charges for his corrupt behaviour, when can this be discussed in the H of C, should the RF continue to be responsible for managing their own finances without more outside checks and more transparency and accountability, to name but a few subjects for discussion?
But no, there is nothing further to discuss about Andrew apparently! Nothing at all! So let’s continue to have a dig at Meghan! It’s laughable honestly!
And most reasonable people see through it and understand that even now, all of these years on, criticism of MM is being used as a useful distraction away from pertinent questions being asked about whether some key members of RF see themselves as above the law?