Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Is Meghan a narcissist?

888 replies

Clbs · 28/09/2025 08:20

I keep seeing these reels and social media smears on Meghan being a narcissist and abusive partner to Harry. She certainly doesn't seem overly popular with the royal family or understood the expectations of her as a royal when she married him.

I'm by no means a royalist or a fan of Megan's. But I'm the same age as Harry so always felt I could relate a little to him. I haven't read his book or watched the netflix docs.

The main thing that doesn't sit quite right for me is they wanted a 'private life' and then done anything but. Did Megan use Harry's desire for privacy to isolate him from his family and friends?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
20
Poirot1983 · 28/09/2025 17:12

We can’t know whether she’s actually been diagnosed with Narcissistic personality disorder.

I don’t think that in reality she enjoyed living in the UK with all the strict restrictions being a member of the RF requires. Had they taken a bit more time before marriage, she probably would have realised that Royal life wasn't for her. But they were in love, didn’t necessarily have a lot of time to date before having children they both wanted. Harry put her and their children before his family and Royal duty.

I do think that he is very impressionable and probably regrets Spare. I imagine the money was irresistible to him.

I don’t think it’s really any more complicated than that.

thenightsky · 28/09/2025 17:30

HappyByTheRiver · 28/09/2025 16:49

He is about 25 years older than her isn’t he? Those ages aren’t right. He was 40 something.

Andrew was born in 1960. Virginia in 1983.

HappyByTheRiver · 28/09/2025 17:33

thenightsky · 28/09/2025 17:30

Andrew was born in 1960. Virginia in 1983.

Thank you. I knew he couldn’t have been only 21 when she was 17.

So he was 40. What a disgusting piece of shit he is.

ohyesido · 28/09/2025 17:55

No, I think she’s a perfectly nice woman who has been vilified by the press and treated cruelly by key people in the royal household. I believe that she’s told the truth and is bewildered by the public hatred for her

SynysterGates · 28/09/2025 17:57

jumpingthehighjump · 28/09/2025 16:31

I think the OP has literally lit the blue touch paper and ran

Good to see the normal armchair psychiatrists are out in force again

I admire her resilience given she receives more constant negative and nasty press, media, online comments than very very many people. She's irritating at times but she isn't a mass murderer. On here you would think she was.
She is called every name under the sun. And some of it is quite revolting

Edited

So agree

BasilParsley · 28/09/2025 18:35

Muffinmam · 28/09/2025 09:05

Yes. She wasn’t born with connections and
money. She had had to work for everything she has. I don’t like her as a person but I understand her. The British aristocracy hate that she has married in. However, Harry was given a hovel to live in when he was with Megan and the workers cottage he was later leased was decrepit and he had to fix up using his own money.

😂😂😂😂😂😂

My2cents1975 · 28/09/2025 21:17

Neither Frogmore Cottage nor the UK Ambassador to South Africa's residence was up to scratch for M, a former renter of a modest home in Toronto.

To paraphrase the late QE2, M was far too grand for the House of Windsor.

Outig · 28/09/2025 22:49

I don’t know what’s going on with her, but she comes across as extremely unlikeable.

She looks absolutely manic in some of her interviews, huge smile at really inappropriate times, and often not making any sense whatsoever. There is a speech she gave wearing a red outfit, and she looked utterly absurd, speaking through a permanent open mouthed smile.

She is very attractive and that gets people places.

Lunde · 28/09/2025 22:57

Muffinmam · 28/09/2025 09:05

Yes. She wasn’t born with connections and
money. She had had to work for everything she has. I don’t like her as a person but I understand her. The British aristocracy hate that she has married in. However, Harry was given a hovel to live in when he was with Megan and the workers cottage he was later leased was decrepit and he had to fix up using his own money.

The "hovel" that is a Grade II listed building designed by world famous architect Sir Christopher Wren (who is better known for St Pauls Cathedral)?

The "hovel" where his neighbours were Princess Eugenie (Ivy cottage) and the Duke of Kent (Wren cottage)?

The "hovel" where Prince William and Catherine lived for 3 years - with Prince George as well?

Harry could have spent a bit of his own £2 million a year allowance or some of the millions he inherited when he turned 21 buying some decent non-IKEA furniture or organised a decorator.

And as for the "workers cottage" .... it was also a Grade II listed, historic house with significant royal connections built be Queen Charlotte in 1801, and also home to the Grand Duchess Xenia Alexandrovna. It was converted to Harry and Meghan's specifications in 2019 at a cost of £2.4 million from the sovereign grant but then the announced 6-7 months after moving in that they were leaving the UK. They were meant to pay rent after stepping back as working royals.

bluegreygreen · 28/09/2025 23:31

However, Harry was given a hovel to live in when he was with Megan and the workers cottage he was later leased was decrepit and he had to fix up using his own money.

I must admit, I thought this bit was a wind-up, as no-one really could be so daft, could they?

Falseknock · 28/09/2025 23:40

PrimeTimeNow · 28/09/2025 08:31

Yes she is and yes she did.

If/when the relationship breaks down he’ll be in no man’s land:

Should he stay in America - a foreign country - or should he come home, where he’s shot himself in the foot with his family by writing that book and doing those interviews.

She’ll never bring those children to England and so he’ll likely stay in America just so he can see the kids.

Charles will always love him - it’s his kid - and I’m sure the door with be open to Harry as far as he’s concerned. But as soon as William takes over Harry’s stuffed. William and Kate will never forgive him for what he’s done.

Is that what William and Kate said to you. You must know them so well.

MeandBobbyMcGoo · 28/09/2025 23:54

I always read these threads but never comment. I think Meghan had no idea how the royals are actually just custodians of huge riches and not living like billionaires. That's pretty obvious to see in any palace/castle tour. Absolutely priceless things but not really luxurious in the modern sense. I then think she wanted to be richer and interact with the uber rich more, and asked for the half in half out settlement which didn't work and then had to change the narrative to suit. I think Harry is very, very dim and did not prepare her at all or explained anything to her. Her performance when an HIV positive mother in South Africa was telling her harrowing life story made me see Meghan differently. Every moment seems to be time for her close up. Is she a narcissist - maybe, maybe not but I don't think she's a lot of fun to be around.

TooTooMuchEverything · 29/09/2025 00:51

EchoedSilence · 28/09/2025 08:42

I doubt any of the internet diagnosers even know what a Narcissist is.

It's one of the most over used words on MN.

Thank you.

I'm so tired of armchair psychiatrists diagnosing people with personality disorders. Especially people they don’t actually know in real life.

TooTooMuchEverything · 29/09/2025 00:59

Lunde · 28/09/2025 22:57

The "hovel" that is a Grade II listed building designed by world famous architect Sir Christopher Wren (who is better known for St Pauls Cathedral)?

The "hovel" where his neighbours were Princess Eugenie (Ivy cottage) and the Duke of Kent (Wren cottage)?

The "hovel" where Prince William and Catherine lived for 3 years - with Prince George as well?

Harry could have spent a bit of his own £2 million a year allowance or some of the millions he inherited when he turned 21 buying some decent non-IKEA furniture or organised a decorator.

And as for the "workers cottage" .... it was also a Grade II listed, historic house with significant royal connections built be Queen Charlotte in 1801, and also home to the Grand Duchess Xenia Alexandrovna. It was converted to Harry and Meghan's specifications in 2019 at a cost of £2.4 million from the sovereign grant but then the announced 6-7 months after moving in that they were leaving the UK. They were meant to pay rent after stepping back as working royals.

Because it’s a historic house doesn’t mean it’s a good house to live in now. The photos I’ve seen of Nottingham cottage aren’t impressive.

Not debating that Wren wasn’t a brilliant architect, but like all architects he would have had a brief. And really that brief looks like it had a very strict and minimal budget.

The location though is pretty damn good 👍

ozarina · 29/09/2025 01:09

Muffinmam · 28/09/2025 09:05

Yes. She wasn’t born with connections and
money. She had had to work for everything she has. I don’t like her as a person but I understand her. The British aristocracy hate that she has married in. However, Harry was given a hovel to live in when he was with Megan and the workers cottage he was later leased was decrepit and he had to fix up using his own money.

A hovel?

ozarina · 29/09/2025 01:13

DrowningInSyrup · 28/09/2025 17:02

I hate it too. I also despise the constant analysing and obsession about Meghan. To be honest I admire the fact she hasn't jumped off a cliff, she is the most hated woman in Britain and to remain strong in the face of that is pretty remarkable. The media is utterly horrible. I neither dislike or like her because I've never met her.

You don't need to have met someone to like or dislike their actions and their output though. She creates a great deal of her own negative public image.

CurlewKate · 29/09/2025 03:37

ozarina · 29/09/2025 01:13

You don't need to have met someone to like or dislike their actions and their output though. She creates a great deal of her own negative public image.

No. But you probably have to have met somebody to diagnose a significant psychological pathology. Oh, and having a having a medical qualification would help too….

AccessSaver · 29/09/2025 05:29

Muffinmam · 28/09/2025 09:05

Yes. She wasn’t born with connections and
money. She had had to work for everything she has. I don’t like her as a person but I understand her. The British aristocracy hate that she has married in. However, Harry was given a hovel to live in when he was with Megan and the workers cottage he was later leased was decrepit and he had to fix up using his own money.

The 'hovel' (Nott Cottage?) was once lived in by William and Kate too.

SpidersAreShitheads · 29/09/2025 05:33

There is a bit of a trend to throw around the narcissist label. It’s really overused along with other buzzwords like gaslighting.

The media are capable of spinning things either way, so I think it’s best to judge someone by what you see and hear yourself.

The problem I have is that Meghan lies. Both deliberately and clearly, and also by the things she implies. And then there are other stories that are so implausible they are extremely hard to believe - but veer onto sensitive subjects so no one really wants to suggest outright that she’s lying about them as well. “Her truth” is not the same as “the truth”.

Harry is just as full of BS. Spare contained provable lies (such as the story about where he was when the Queen Mum died - there are actual photos placing him elsewhere).

I also think that for two people who talk a lot about the damage the press can do, publicly rubbishing their family/inlaws in a documentary series, Oprah interview, and a book shows real disregard for their welfare. They knew how much distress such a huge public campaign would cause and they didn’t care - despite all the word salads about stopping harmful public discourse.

And then there’s all the “coincidental” launches. Repeatedly on Catherine’s birthday, when William was on stage launching the Earth Award - even though she clearly wasn’t actually ready to launch anything. I thought initially it was just coincidental but years of Meghan launching something or releasing juicy tidbits just when the Royals, especially William and Catherine were doing something, you’d have to be a fool to believe it’s just a series of unfortunate coincidences.

The video doing the rounds this week of Meghan walking off stage abruptly is just bizarre. She’s certainly someone who prefers being front and centre.

She launches so many businesses or side hustles, only to abruptly abandon them. As Ever seems to have stuck, sort of, so hopefully that will carry on. I hope her and Harry do well enough to be content so they’re not tempted into releasing more spite and malice.

I understand there will be people who feel sorry for Meghan. And I do think maybe there’s an element of a culture clash - it’s hard for a lot of Brits to be comfortable with the typical Cali vibe, as we find it lacking in authenticity and a bit self-absorbed. However I find it bizarre that people really try to insist she hasn’t lied when she demonstrably has. Repeatedly. The media are bastards but she courts publicity and really doesn’t help herself.

I don’t know whether Meghan or Harry is worse, or whether they just bring out the negative traits in each other.

Jumpitha · 29/09/2025 05:46

Catpiece · 28/09/2025 09:48

She had no intention of fitting into the RF. She set her stall out before the wedding. I don’t think she could believe her luck when Harry fell for her. She came across as completely disingenuous in the engagement interview. Gushing, fake and taking the lead that wasn’t hers to take. At the engagement photo shoot she took the lead. She truly believed she could undo years of royal tradition to make life all about her. She’s bitterly jealous of Kate and I don’t believe for a minute any of them mentioned her colour. That was most likely her poking the race situation with a stick to see if anyone responded. In what we thought was her final act of defiance she took off to the States with poor sap Harry in tow and claimed she wanted a life out of the spotlight which has turned out to be laughable. She’s done a right number on Harry. He’ll be discarded soon like the first husband was and she’s made sure his bridges have been burned. What an incredibly foolish man he’s been.

What a nasty, misogynistic post. You all really need to go out and tough some grass.

augustusglupe · 29/09/2025 06:00

I don’t know. What sticks in my mind though, is that ridiculous over the top curtesy she did in an interview, showing us how she had curtsied to the late Queen.
It seemed like such a mean thing to do and Harry just sits there watching her take the piss out of his grandma. I honestly think they’re as bad as each other.
He’s an ungrateful spoiled brat.

jumpingthehighjump · 29/09/2025 06:38

Jumpitha · 29/09/2025 05:46

What a nasty, misogynistic post. You all really need to go out and tough some grass.

Totally agree. There are some truly nasty posts on here, I sometimes wonder whether posters read back what they have written

And as predicted the OP has disappeared. She started a thread to have a go at Meghan and walked off. And what a coincidence it's a NCer with one solitary post

Betty1625 · 29/09/2025 07:02

Muffinmam · 28/09/2025 09:05

Yes. She wasn’t born with connections and
money. She had had to work for everything she has. I don’t like her as a person but I understand her. The British aristocracy hate that she has married in. However, Harry was given a hovel to live in when he was with Megan and the workers cottage he was later leased was decrepit and he had to fix up using his own money.

Lol what are you on about "hovel to live in"
He was already living in that so called hovel when they started dating. C&W lived there previously with baby george. It's these sort of "grievances" that get publics backs up

Betty1625 · 29/09/2025 07:05

Can't label people narcissist without actually knowing them, but I find both her and H odd.
She reminds me of a relative that always feels wronged and hard done by, and has great admiration for herself

forgotmyusername1 · 29/09/2025 07:06

I think Megan's idea of being a princess came from Disney movies and the hallmark channel. She thought you get to wear pretty dresses, go to balls, be famous and wave at the crowds. She didn't realise it is a job with expectations, that you have to go to places you don't want to go and there is a pecking order based on rank, that there is an institution that must be fit into and the price for the money, fame and jewells is personal freedom - the ultimate 'guilded cage'. Maybe Harry didn't teach her, maybe she didn't want to learn but either way she was unprepared for the realities of being in the monarchy.