I don't understand how the monarchy still exists, or if it does, how this particular family have remained top dogs.
There used to be warrior kings up to and including Henry VIII, they were hardened fighters and strategists, protecting their domains and position. Violent thugs, a lot of them, but you could see why they were king, they were the strongest ones around. They fought constantly to maintain their authority and and possessions, they were the typical dominant alpha male. The crown wasn't automatically inherited by the eldest son, there was a witan to choose a king from a pool of eligibles, if it wasn't grabbed by a self-selected earl. It may have been unfair, there are hosts of reasons why that system is no more, but you could see how the rulers obtained and held on to their position, by their own personal efforts.
Compare that with the current bunch of entitled wasters - who is keeping them on the throne? They certainly don't have enough get up and go to fight to keep their position. If people really want a monarchy, why hasn't someone more suitable been put in place, or muscled their way in? Do any of us think that the king has done anything to deserve his position? If we want someone from that family, surely Anne is by far the better choice?
It is in someone's interests to be keeping Charles on the throne, to be protecting his lowlife brother, I just can't work out who or why! Why are there no challengers?