Natasha Archer’s Instagram Following

[tataler]

I’m somewhat fascinated by the instagram following of Kate’s former stylist and personal assistant of 15 years.

Understandable to monitor fashion blogs like whatmeghanwore but what’s the interest in Heather Dorak or Daniel Martin?

She even followed Meghan and asever before hastily unfollowing - why hide now?

Perhaps part of her new luxury fashion consultancy is keeping tabs on in-laws friends and associates.

Harry described Meghan as “the most trolled person in the world” two weeks ago, is that recent enough for you?

https://pagesix.com/2025/06/28/celebrity-news/prince-harry-says-meghan-markle-was-most-trolled-person-in-the-world-during-surprise-appearance-in-new-york/

Not even two weeks ago, in fact:

Prince Harry has raised eyebrows with fresh comments about his wife Meghan Markle and the online trolling she faced in 2018.
The Duke of Sussex, 40, made the remarks during a surprise solo appearance at the Nexus Global Summit in New York on Friday, where he joined Nexus co-founder Rachel Gerrol for a panel discussion on digital safety for children, a cause he and his 43-year-old wife have long championed through their Archewell Foundation.
"Why the digital world was so important to us was because my wife in 2018 was the most trolled person in the world," he told the audience.

'The article was eventually taken down, what made it worse was what followed: instead of condemning it, the Royal Family welcomed Clarkson. They received him publicly not a word of criticism, not a single gesture to distance themselves. That’s not neutrality; that’s complicity. It sends a loud message about where they stand.'

You do your argument no favours with your inaccuracies 🤔.
The RF haven't' 'welcomed' Clarkson. He attended a lunch at which the Queen was also present. Mind you, so did Dame Judi Dench, so I guess she's complicit too.

The RF don't comment, didn't comment when all the nastiness towards Kate was going on - remember Stephen Colbert? Comments only serve to stoke the flames. It's a wise position. Plus, of course, we haven't seen Harry and /or Meghan distancing themselves from any of the unpleasant, even disgusting comments their friends have made about the rf - Bouzy, Perry, Scobie, the Sussex Squad members who tour with them. So Harry and Meghan appear to be even more complicit in the nastiness.

I agree. The media was absolutely vile to Catherine for a good 10 years before she married William. Harassing her at her workplace, hacking her (she is by far the most hacked of the royals), up skirting her, following her, calling her all sorts of misogynistic slurs to get a reaction, going after her sister etc. Like nothing anyone else has endured, not even Diana. Then when she got married, a very interesting development occurred, where the media started receiving reports that she was not being nice to the York girls - a remarkably similar bunch of petty complaints to the "not taking me shopping" and "not sharing her lip gloss" complaints of Meghan. And then of course, Eugenie and Fergie became friends with Meghan through Soho House, sometime before her officially known relationship with Harry, and it all started up again against Catherine. And the Yorks got off very lightly in Spare, didn't they. Funny that.

He didnt apologised because its true, as even Piers Morgan (who hates Meghan) and other journalists comfirmed that It was an open known secret that Kate was the one who asked about the kid skin colour. I dont think Kate did It out of racism but concerns to protect the child maybe? But who knows.

Most journalists who trashed women including Meghan and Diana didnt apologise, so why only someone opening something true to the public would need to do that?

Did he apologise to the Dutch translator he lied about? Claiming he hadn't put the identities in the manuscript (and thus implying she had done so, as if she could have known who to include)? The weasel put a woman's professional reputation at stake, and catapulted a private citizen into the public eye against her will, in trying to cover up his own fuck up.

Got an actual source for these allegations, by any chance?

@Raystar confirming there is indeed no royal racist.

There you go again, making stuff up. Morgan confirmed what was published in Scobie's book when it was published in the Netherlands 'by accident' 🙄. Meghan made racism insinuation on Oprah, claiming in an underhand way that the reason her child wasn't titled 'Prince' was because of his colour. Totally untrue, of course, but no apology from Meghan.

The only source is Harry, not the best narrator, also had a similar conversation with Colbert, which he instigated. Is this emotional truth or objective facts. Harry also said it wasn't racism. So I gather there limited evidence of the copying of clothes to actually debate.

But surely it was her job to know who is wearing what & be informed about it - all the more so from the Sussex camp god forbid she ever dress Kate in anything remotely close to what Meghan ever wore. Isn’t it just necessary for her job? How else other than following them does she do this offer wise? Other than have a fake account I guess….

Yes I thought Piers Morgan only confirmed which names appeared in the book. He didn’t comment on whether the allegations of racism were true or confirm that anyone made remarks about Archie’s skin colour.

Maybe rose-tinted spectacles, but I’m sure the Meghan fans on here never used to be quite so dishonest in their posts - plenty of wild speculation yes, but not so much of the presenting lies as fact. Standards are clearly slipping. Mind you, Harry and Meghan’s own relationship to the truth has always been a bit complex, shall we say.

It’s probably because this new batch have migrated from the delights of Reddit!

It was never as vile as what Meghan faced. Kate didn’t endure racism, or media figures fantasizing about parading her naked through the streets, or people calling her child a monkey. No one twisted the truth to claim she made someone cry, only for it to turn out it was the other way around and then still kept spinning it against her. This constant “but Kate got it bad too!” narrative is pure deflection. She’s often praised or coddled for doing the bare minimum or her clothes, while Meghan is attacked for doing or wearing exact same things first. The double standard is glaring.

Diana—she had it worse than both. She was hounded to death by the British media and got It horribly bad simply for speaking out and daring to love outside the establishment, including dating men of color.

That said, what Kate has gone through isn’t okay either, I dont condone it. No woman deserves media abuse. But pretending it’s the same level? That’s just trying to rewrite history.

Not true. Please I ask for you not to lie. He named them as far he could along the contrast the media has with the Royal family

https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/royal-family/news/piers-morgan-names-royals-scobie-book-b2456135.html

www.aol.com/prince-harry-meghan-markle-remain-081136346.html

Speaking of rewriting history, presumably when you say

Diana was hounded to death by the British media

You mean she didn’t put her seat belt on while being driven away from French journalists by someone who had been drinking?

Now you are blaming Diana for dying while hounded by the media and living her private life after leaving the family. How noble of you. I think every person who apparently forgets to use the belt should die, I see. Just leave those women alone, Kate, Meghan etc. And would be better In the social media, if people like Natasha stopped stalking stopped. Or do you condone all that?

Well you can't blame Meghan for what the media did can you. As we know the media go after all the women in the RF whenever they need to fill xoumn inches and make additional revenue through clickbait articles. I hardly see Meghan coordinating this all behind the scenes thats venturing in weird conspiracy theorist rubbish

You dont think she is? I mean this board here do enough od that with a nee thread for every tiny thing she does. Kate is at tennis today, so far noone has started up a thread here. If this was Meghan there would of been already half filled up with nasty comments aboitbwhaf she is wearing and so forth. So I would tend to agree with comment this time.

You’ve jumped the shark with this post and showed your true colours!

Catherine was harassed and attacked constantly by hoards of photographers, yelling “ bitch” and “whore” at her to get her attention and a photo of her distress!
this happened every time she left the house , she was very young , alone and surrounded by 30 middle aged men abusing her.
Meghan wasnt.

catherine Was upskirted often ( grown men taking photos up her skirt)
meghan wasn’t.

catherine was photographed topless by a long angle lens while on holiday and the pictures were published.
meghan wasn’t.

catherine has spent almost twenty years being insulted and criticised by the media .
meghan only managed at most two to three years.

you are parroting a narrative that is not only without facts but is completely untrue.

I can very much blame her for preaching about online bullying, and failing to say a word about those who bully in her name. And given her connections with Christopher Bouzy, you are very naive to think Meghan is above it all.

I’m not denying that Catherine experienced harassment from the paparazzi, especially in her early years—that behavior was appalling, and no woman should have to endure it. But let’s not pretend Meghan didn’t face abuse too, or that what she went through was somehow less valid just because it looked different.

Yes, Meghan may not have been seen “upskirted” (a clothe that her stylist could har prevented by putting the correct weight) or photographed topless (thankfully), but she was subjected to relentless racism, death threats, and dehumanizing headlines from mainstream outlets, not just paparazzi. She was likened to a monkey, accused of making people cry when it was the reverse, and vilified for doing things Catherine was praised for like cradling her baby bump or eating avocado. A madman publicly fantasized about her being paraded naked and humiliated. That kind of targeted hatred is unprecedented in the modern royal era.

The “two to three years” argument also ignores the fact that Meghan and Harry left because the abuse was so constant and brutal, it was driving her to suicidal thoughts. How long someone endures mistreatment doesn’t determine its severity.
So yes, both women suffered in different ways. But dismissing Meghan’s treatment, or insisting Catherine’s was somehow worse, is just shifting the goalposts. We should be able to acknowledge that both were mistreated, while also recognizing the specific and deeply racialized nature of what Meghan endured.

Also, I’d really appreciate it if we could keep this discussion respectful. Personal attacks and conspiracy like assumptions about people’s intentions don’t help the conversation and come off as unnecessarily aggressive or unhinged. We can chat without being hostile.

Well stalking has a definition in law and I’m pretty sure that following public social media accounts isn’t it.

I’m not blaming Diana at all - sorry if that wasn’t clear - I think her death was a terrible accident. I suppose if you are really keen on apportioning blame then the drunk driver was most at fault. I can’t see how the British media can be held responsible at all. I am blaming you though, for repeatedly posting inflammatory and ridiculous lies.