Natasha Archer’s Instagram Following

[tataler]

I’m somewhat fascinated by the instagram following of Kate’s former stylist and personal assistant of 15 years.

Understandable to monitor fashion blogs like whatmeghanwore but what’s the interest in Heather Dorak or Daniel Martin?

She even followed Meghan and asever before hastily unfollowing - why hide now?

Perhaps part of her new luxury fashion consultancy is keeping tabs on in-laws friends and associates.

Let’s keep the conversation grounded.
First, yes, stalking has a legal definition in law, that doesn’t mean obsessive monitoring, targeted harassment, or coordinated online campaigns can’t be abusive or harmful just because they happen on public platforms. The law isn’t the only lens through which we should view behavior, especially when we’re talking about mass media and social pressure. Theres stalking used in personal qnd psychological terms too, for a start, lets not cherry pick here.

Second, I’m glad you clarified that you’re not blaming Diana, but to say the British media holds no responsibility for the conditions that led to her death is simply not accurate. The paparazzi were literally chasing the car. Even investigations acknowledged their involvement, and the public backlash against media intrusion after her death speaks volumes. The drunk driver was of course responsible in a direct legal sense, but let’s not pretend the press’s relentless pursuit and hounding over years didn’t contribute to the tragedy.
Finally, accusing me of spreading “inflammatory and ridiculous lies” feels like an attempt to shut down uncomfortable truths.

If you disagree with a point, challenge it with fact, not personal attacks. I’m here to have a conversation, not a shouting or blaming match with people whose I dont know personally. Let’s keep things respectful and rooted in reality.

I must admit I take those claims with a pinch of salt because a) they lie about so much else; b) people never seem able to back up the claims - eg PP lying about British journalists calling for Meghan to be lynched; and c) they seem compelled to embellish / exaggerate / fabricate evidence of such claims - eg Oprah making up headlines and H+M pretending that press interest in Katie Price and a 2011 Harry Potter premiere was something to do with them. Which suggests to me that there just isn’t any actual evidence 🤷‍♀️

At some point, continuing to deny clear, documented facts stops being skepticism, and starts becoming willful ignorance or, frankly, something more malicious.

There’s a mountain of evidence showing how Meghan was treated, from racist headlines to double standards in coverage and it’s been backed by journalists, academics, and human rights organizations. Pretending that none of it exists, or that it’s all made up, isn’t just disingenuous, it’s enabling a narrative that actively erases the harm done.

We can disagree on interpretations, but facts are facts. And denying them while people are still suffering from the consequences isn’t just dishonest, it’s harmful.

Yes, Meghan may not have been seen “upskirted” (a clothe that her stylist could har prevented by putting the correct weight)

Funny how you got all indignant about a poster “blaming” Diana for not wearing a seatbelt yet it’s Kate or her stylist’s fault for her being upskirted. True colours alert.

There are as the youngsters say now , receipts for every single thing I’ve pointed out .

the level and abuse Catherine faced every time she left the house ( for years ) exceeded what any other royal faced .
this wasn’t harassment it was plain abuse!

and I forgot to add ! Catherine’s phone was hacked twice as many times as Williams and four times the amount of Harry’s.

where are your receipts? , even Oprah couldn’t manage to provide them , it’s why they had to use foreign papers for the headlines.
and Netflix used a Harry Potter premiere and Katy prices court entrance for paparazzi footage.

I’m not sure which “uncomfortable truths” you think I’m trying to shut down? That British journalists called for Meghan to be lynched, as you anlleged earlier? But it was a lie, right?

Fyi as you appear not to know, Diana died in Paris. The paparazzi following her car were French.

Now waiting to read how it was the British media’s fault that French photographers followed her car.. presumably nobody would have heard of the ex PoW, ex wife and mother of the future king, whose wedding was watched by 750M people worldwide, if it wasn’t for the pesky Daily Mail?

Can I ask, why do you think they made up evidence if there is so much of it in existence? They went back to 2011 to find footage from that HP premiere.

Why did you make up the thing about lynching? Why not just use something that actually happened?

Oh I’m being very grounded and respectful!
it’s not my fault if the facts don’t align with your opinions.

There’s a mountain of evidence showing how Meghan was treated, from racist headlines to double standards in coverage and it’s been backed by journalists, academics, and human rights organizations. Pretending that none of it exists, or that it’s all made up, isn’t just disingenuous, it’s enabling a narrative that actively erases the harm done

Using your vernacular, show us your receipts, Oprah had to make the headlines up and produce fake footage of the paparazzi stalking Meghan so it will be interesting to see what you come up with.

Also - I appreciate you think I’m nitpicking by mentioning the legal definition, but how does following someone’s public social media account constitute stalking by any definition? 😂

Diana didn't wear a seat belt.

Interestingly, neither did Harry in the alleged NYC cab chase. It's illegal not to wear a seat belt in NYC. Drivers can be ticketed for this in traffic stops. In cabs, you are repeatedly told to buckle up and or have to listen to lots of dings so it was a conscious decision not to buckle up.

Sorry off topic!
how are you bemused? , everything going ok ?
haven’t seen you recently and remember that you said things were a bit rubbish.

how would weights in the hem of her skirt have prevented upskirting anyway?

Does up skirting have a different meaning in the US @Raystar ?

Yes I was wondering myself?
unless you put the weight on the photographers arm?
however seeing as many of these particular photographers actually laid in the gutter trying to get photos not sure if it would work!

Maybe wherever @Raystar lives there are different meanings for upskirting, stalking, lynching, British media, facts and reality.

Where are your receipts for saying Meghan is a scam artist? Who was scammed? Whose money did she fraudently take? Lets see your evidence

Wow what the women who marry prince’s is dreadful.
you would think in this day and age it wouldn’t be a thing still.
strangely it doesn’t happen to the men who marry in.

Flattered but not interested, sorry

I think you will see there is discussion of this outfit elsewhere.

Eh?

There's only one person doing the lying on this thread. Even your own link to the Independent states:
'Earlier this week, the broadcaster decided to name the Princess of Wales and King Charles as the two senior royals inadvertently identified in an excerpt from Omid Scobie’s book about the royal racism scandal involving Prince Harry and Meghan Markle in 2021.'
' If Dutch people wandering into a bookshop can see these names, then you, the British people who actually pay for the royal family are entitled to know, too,” Morgan said'

As I said in my post which you accused me of lying in, he named Kate and Charles on the publication of the Dutch version of Spare. By the link you offered yourself.

You're plopping all over this thread with statements and claims which have been debunked, with the receipts you're so keen on, and you're accusing other posters of lying? Get your own house in order.

Meghan was threatened with lynching?

Big cow eyes, trembling lip letting others take the bait 🙄

Yes this went on for months and we still have a poster who refers to Catherine's illness in a dubious way.

Exactly. Meghan doesn’t hold any real power in media that’s why she’s constantly attacked. The monarchy, on the other hand, have influence and longstanding relationships with the press in exchange of flattering covering. Well the idea that Meghan was somehow orchestrating anything behind the scenes is not only absurd, it’s pure projection, total lunacy. In truth she is often fighting against the media and suing them. If she were behind forums the topics would be way more flattering.

It’s a deflection tactic, blaming the one without institutional backing while excusing those who actually have the media on their side.