Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Natasha Archer’s Instagram Following

546 replies

tataler · 11/07/2025 09:17

I’m somewhat fascinated by the instagram following of Kate’s former stylist and personal assistant of 15 years.

Understandable to monitor fashion blogs like whatmeghanwore but what’s the interest in Heather Dorak or Daniel Martin?

She even followed Meghan and asever before hastily unfollowing - why hide now?

Perhaps part of her new luxury fashion consultancy is keeping tabs on in-laws friends and associates.

Natasha Archer’s Instagram Following
Natasha Archer’s Instagram Following
OP posts:
Thread gallery
27
Serenster · 12/07/2025 21:26

Kate and Meghan were victims from media, but do you see that in this case Natasha can be seen as a stalker here?

No, not at all. Legally, stalking is a course of conduct that causes the victim to fear violence or experience significant emotional or psychological distress.

Natasha Archer followed people’s public instagram accounts. Anyone can follow a public instagram account. It’s not remotely stalking,

Nagginthenag · 12/07/2025 21:28

If I was a member of the Sussex Squad, I'd be keeping my head down rather than accuse someone else of stalking. Pot/kettle and all that.

Watcherfour · 12/07/2025 21:30

Serenster · 12/07/2025 21:26

Kate and Meghan were victims from media, but do you see that in this case Natasha can be seen as a stalker here?

No, not at all. Legally, stalking is a course of conduct that causes the victim to fear violence or experience significant emotional or psychological distress.

Natasha Archer followed people’s public instagram accounts. Anyone can follow a public instagram account. It’s not remotely stalking,

No one is accusing her of a crime. The term stalking is also used more broadly to describe obsessive or invasive patterns of behavior not just the legal definition.

Nagginthenag · 12/07/2025 21:31

Watcherfour · 12/07/2025 21:30

No one is accusing her of a crime. The term stalking is also used more broadly to describe obsessive or invasive patterns of behavior not just the legal definition.

So you do mean the Sussex Squad then......

myrtleWilson · 12/07/2025 21:33

@Watcherfour where is the obsessive or invasive patterns of behavio(u)r?

Watcherfour · 12/07/2025 21:41

Nagginthenag · 12/07/2025 21:31

So you do mean the Sussex Squad then......

Not everyone who criticise the establishment or point their faults is part of the Sussex Squad. Accusing random people like that is just crazy. Everyone has the right to their own opinions they can like Meghan, dislike her, or feel neutral without being a obsessive fan or a hater.

Nagginthenag · 12/07/2025 21:44

Watcherfour · 12/07/2025 21:41

Not everyone who criticise the establishment or point their faults is part of the Sussex Squad. Accusing random people like that is just crazy. Everyone has the right to their own opinions they can like Meghan, dislike her, or feel neutral without being a obsessive fan or a hater.

My comment was about stalkerish behaviour. I didn't accuse any individual. Odd that you perceived it that way though.

Serenster · 12/07/2025 21:48

The term stalking is also used more broadly to describe obsessive or invasive patterns of behavior not just the legal definition.

I repeat, Natasha Archer followed people’s public instagram accounts. There is no evidence she interacted with them in any way beyond that. There is no evidence she did anything obsessive or invasive - people who post on a publicly available account have clearly consented to the public at large viewing their posts. They could all of them easily have made their accounts private after all. But they didn’t.

You post on a public message board yourself (self evidently). Do you genuinely think people who read your posts are demonstrating invasive behaviour? If you do, you need to rethink your posting!

LaMarschallin · 12/07/2025 21:52

Sunnyfox
Victim of what exactly? The wind? Over and over again? No one physically lifted her skirt, photographers captured what happened because of her wardrobe choices. There are plenty of ways to prevent that, especially when you’re a public figure. She also had past incidents of being captured flashing her genitals at parties before becoming a royal.

Catherine was "captured" (do you mean photographed?) "flashing her genitals at parties"?
What? Deliberately?

This thread has become so mad.

MrsFinkelstein · 12/07/2025 21:57

So it appears that fans of H&M do not understand what the crimes of upskirting and stalking actually are.

That tracks.

Edit - they appear to think someone's skirt or dress hem blowing up in the wind and it being photographed is upskirting. It's utterly depressing that they have no fecking clue and are minimizing criminal SA.

BigWillyLittleTodger · 12/07/2025 22:07

She also had past incidents of being captured flashing her genitals at parties before becoming a royal.

How desperate and downright revolting to post something like this.

Watcherfour · 12/07/2025 22:15

Serenster · 12/07/2025 21:48

The term stalking is also used more broadly to describe obsessive or invasive patterns of behavior not just the legal definition.

I repeat, Natasha Archer followed people’s public instagram accounts. There is no evidence she interacted with them in any way beyond that. There is no evidence she did anything obsessive or invasive - people who post on a publicly available account have clearly consented to the public at large viewing their posts. They could all of them easily have made their accounts private after all. But they didn’t.

You post on a public message board yourself (self evidently). Do you genuinely think people who read your posts are demonstrating invasive behaviour? If you do, you need to rethink your posting!

Then why did she unfollow all of them after disclosing her insta, and It was shown that she followed markle's close friends, business partners etc. Its stalking, not in a mutual friendship. Even If It isn't and she was just curious, the public will accuse her and Kate of that, they already are doing that: stalking, specially since there was already reporting of the copying of outfits in magazines.

She could do a statememt to end those rumours then, or it will keep going forever.

Nagginthenag · 12/07/2025 22:21

But as has been repeatedly pointed out on this thread, there's a finite number of fashion styles - at some stage, someone is going to wear something that is similar to a thing once worn by someone else. There's plenty of evidence of Meghan cosplaying Diana and Wallis Simpson - what do you make of that?

DelectableMe · 12/07/2025 22:28

BigWillyLittleTodger · 12/07/2025 22:07

She also had past incidents of being captured flashing her genitals at parties before becoming a royal.

How desperate and downright revolting to post something like this.

It's such a vile accusation.

Serenster · 12/07/2025 22:30

Watcherfour · 12/07/2025 22:15

Then why did she unfollow all of them after disclosing her insta, and It was shown that she followed markle's close friends, business partners etc. Its stalking, not in a mutual friendship. Even If It isn't and she was just curious, the public will accuse her and Kate of that, they already are doing that: stalking, specially since there was already reporting of the copying of outfits in magazines.

She could do a statememt to end those rumours then, or it will keep going forever.

Because it’s become a big story for Meghan’s supporters and she’d rather not be a focus of their craziness? And who can blame her…

Serenster · 12/07/2025 22:32

And people keep saying Kate has been copying Megan, but no one has yet shown an instance of this, despite repeatedly being invited to.

Watcherfour · 12/07/2025 22:36

Serenster · 12/07/2025 22:30

Because it’s become a big story for Meghan’s supporters and she’d rather not be a focus of their craziness? And who can blame her…

But its in this forum with 200+ posts and in some news outlets so its not about Meghan supporters only.

Chosendolphin · 12/07/2025 22:50

But.. but... i thought Meghan Markle was irrelevant? Seconded Kate's stans. And in the end Kate's team was stalking everyone close to this irrelevant woman

Nagginthenag · 12/07/2025 23:00

It's easy to see Kate's had a great week, with state visits and banquets, meeting world leaders and a lovely welcoming ovation at Wimbledon 😁

myrtleWilson · 12/07/2025 23:05

Welcome to the RF board @Chosendolphin great to see a new member!

Watcherfour · 12/07/2025 23:06

Nagginthenag · 12/07/2025 23:00

It's easy to see Kate's had a great week, with state visits and banquets, meeting world leaders and a lovely welcoming ovation at Wimbledon 😁

True. I hope she doesnt get booed like her last appareances in public. She needs peace and rest.

onehorserace · 12/07/2025 23:08

Watcherfour · 12/07/2025 23:06

True. I hope she doesnt get booed like her last appareances in public. She needs peace and rest.

Booed? When was this ?

BigWillyLittleTodger · 12/07/2025 23:10

Watcherfour · 12/07/2025 23:06

True. I hope she doesnt get booed like her last appareances in public. She needs peace and rest.

You’ve really jumped the shark now! Honestly try harder and with something a bit more convincing.

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14900167/Moment-Kate-overwhelmed-huge-crowd.html

onehorserace · 12/07/2025 23:10

LaMarschallin · 12/07/2025 21:52

Sunnyfox
Victim of what exactly? The wind? Over and over again? No one physically lifted her skirt, photographers captured what happened because of her wardrobe choices. There are plenty of ways to prevent that, especially when you’re a public figure. She also had past incidents of being captured flashing her genitals at parties before becoming a royal.

Catherine was "captured" (do you mean photographed?) "flashing her genitals at parties"?
What? Deliberately?

This thread has become so mad.

What's your source? @Sunnyfox

Nagginthenag · 12/07/2025 23:11

The plopping has, as predicted, started.

Swipe left for the next trending thread