Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Natasha Archer’s Instagram Following

546 replies

tataler · 11/07/2025 09:17

I’m somewhat fascinated by the instagram following of Kate’s former stylist and personal assistant of 15 years.

Understandable to monitor fashion blogs like whatmeghanwore but what’s the interest in Heather Dorak or Daniel Martin?

She even followed Meghan and asever before hastily unfollowing - why hide now?

Perhaps part of her new luxury fashion consultancy is keeping tabs on in-laws friends and associates.

Natasha Archer’s Instagram Following
Natasha Archer’s Instagram Following
OP posts:
Thread gallery
27
Nagginthenag · 12/07/2025 20:30

Oh, and please don't report them - let the posts stand.

BigWillyLittleTodger · 12/07/2025 20:31

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Flowermoons · 12/07/2025 20:34

I think Natasha is Meghan's fan 😃 this would explain things

NormaMajors1992coat · 12/07/2025 20:43

Sunnyfox · 12/07/2025 20:23

Victim of what exactly? The wind? Over and over again? No one physically lifted her skirt, photographers captured what happened because of her wardrobe choices. There are plenty of ways to prevent that, especially when you’re a public figure. She also had past incidents of being captured flashing her genitals at parties before becoming a royal. So no, this wasn’t some shocking new situation, she should’ve learned by then If It worried her so much.

And really, are you really comparing this to the racism Meghan faced? To the pain of Diana? To the harsh stuff Letizia passed? That’s not only tone-deaf, it’s insulting. Take a break.

Please - check what upskirting means. It has nothing to do with the wind. You are really making yourself look stupid and/or an apologist for sexual harassment here. Upskirting is a criminal offence punishable by imprisonment. It is nothing to do with skirts getting blown up by the wind. It is not the fault of the victim and their wardrobe choices. I can hardly believe what I’m reading in your post. I just hope it comes from mere ignorance and not malice. Really shocking.

Raystar · 12/07/2025 21:01

myrtleWilson · 12/07/2025 20:18

@Raystar sorry, firstly Kate didn't have a team when this was happening and other than always wear trousers, what could she have done to avoid upskirting. Can you please be specific as to the incidents you understand to be upskirting - otherwise, I and others on the thread will have to go with the view as you being a victim blamer.

First of ALL, When you compare upskirting to racism, or a stylist’s oversight to the brutal legacy of colonialism and racial scapegoating, it’s not just ignorant, it’s a deliberate tactic. It’s about creating a false equivalence to blur the moral lines, distract from systemic injustice, and erode empathy for the real victim.

It reduces racism a structure that destroys lives, mental health, careers, and reputations to the level of a wardrobe mishap. That’s not defending women’s dignity; that’s weaponizing outrage selectively to protect your narrative. And the fact that you can’t tell the difference or refuse to is exactly why this conversation still matters.

Particularly I never condoned upskirting. those pictures shouldnt had been publicised. But this is not what this chat is about. Please dont ignore that and cherry pick to distort my words again. And i would be thankful If the conspiracies and personal attacks towards anyone stopped, its childish.

Vespanest · 12/07/2025 21:03

this thread is bonkers, from following people on instagram being accused of stalking to victims of sexual assault being to blame. I hope these posts stand to show the vileness. I'd also hope whatever a poster feels regarding Meghan or Catherine they would draw the line at accusing victims of up skirting of being responsible. Silence is complicit and all that.

Nagginthenag · 12/07/2025 21:07

'A wardrobe mishap.'

Ffs. Stop digging, honestly, the hole's deep enough.

DelectableMe · 12/07/2025 21:08

That's just so crass, isn't it?.

NormaMajors1992coat · 12/07/2025 21:09

I can’t understand why you persist in framing upskirting as a wardrobe mishap or stylist’s oversight. Truly despicable to blame a victim of sexual harassment like this.

jeffgoldblum · 12/07/2025 21:10

This is honestly as bad as the poster who told a poc poster that she deserves being racially abused because she criticised Meghan!

Watcherfour · 12/07/2025 21:11

In this topic: Meghan is being stalked, journalists coddled by the Royal Family were openly racist toward her, and there were other extremely vile things said and done.

Answer from Kate fans? It’s a coincidence!
And then suddenly: But look at how only Kate suffers! Her skirts!
Followed by: You’re vile!
And just like that, they derail the topic.

BigWillyLittleTodger · 12/07/2025 21:12

Why is it against talk guidelines to point out Sussex fans use similar stock phrases? It’s true they do 🤷🏻‍♀️

jeffgoldblum · 12/07/2025 21:12

Watcherfour · 12/07/2025 21:11

In this topic: Meghan is being stalked, journalists coddled by the Royal Family were openly racist toward her, and there were other extremely vile things said and done.

Answer from Kate fans? It’s a coincidence!
And then suddenly: But look at how only Kate suffers! Her skirts!
Followed by: You’re vile!
And just like that, they derail the topic.

You think sexual assault is funny?

Serenster · 12/07/2025 21:12

Kate was a victim of surreptitious, sexually intrusive photography many many times*, and had her privacy invaded more than a hundred times by having her voicemails hacked. Her car was tracked too, and her whereabouts reported on. Appalling violations of her privacy and dignity, every single one of them. False equivalence to blur the moral lines, you say? I think we can form our own views of who is doing so here, and for what reason.

*(It’s still going on by the way. The Sussex Squad routinely post doctored photos of the upskirted photos on twitter with Kate’s underwear photoshopped out to give the impression she wasn’t wearing any. But she’s not a victim of course…)

BigWillyLittleTodger · 12/07/2025 21:13

Has a klaxon gone off??

Nagginthenag · 12/07/2025 21:14

Fink so. Do you think it's because of the news regarding Harry's legal cases?

There's going to be a flurry of plopping posts overnight, claiming all sorts with no evidence, then disappearing back into the woodwork.

myrtleWilson · 12/07/2025 21:15

Raystar · 12/07/2025 21:01

First of ALL, When you compare upskirting to racism, or a stylist’s oversight to the brutal legacy of colonialism and racial scapegoating, it’s not just ignorant, it’s a deliberate tactic. It’s about creating a false equivalence to blur the moral lines, distract from systemic injustice, and erode empathy for the real victim.

It reduces racism a structure that destroys lives, mental health, careers, and reputations to the level of a wardrobe mishap. That’s not defending women’s dignity; that’s weaponizing outrage selectively to protect your narrative. And the fact that you can’t tell the difference or refuse to is exactly why this conversation still matters.

Particularly I never condoned upskirting. those pictures shouldnt had been publicised. But this is not what this chat is about. Please dont ignore that and cherry pick to distort my words again. And i would be thankful If the conspiracies and personal attacks towards anyone stopped, its childish.

What the actual fuck. Please point me to the way in which I have done that which you accuse me of? You've still not shared with the thread your understanding of upskirting. I've given you the benefit of the doubt - but no more. Please be very specific as to where I have cherry picked your words - I haven't. I've asked you to clarify - you have chosen not to do so - your perogative, ours is to view your posts in that light

BigWillyLittleTodger · 12/07/2025 21:15

Nagginthenag · 12/07/2025 21:14

Fink so. Do you think it's because of the news regarding Harry's legal cases?

There's going to be a flurry of plopping posts overnight, claiming all sorts with no evidence, then disappearing back into the woodwork.

Edited

Ooh what news??

NormaMajors1992coat · 12/07/2025 21:15

Watcherfour · 12/07/2025 21:11

In this topic: Meghan is being stalked, journalists coddled by the Royal Family were openly racist toward her, and there were other extremely vile things said and done.

Answer from Kate fans? It’s a coincidence!
And then suddenly: But look at how only Kate suffers! Her skirts!
Followed by: You’re vile!
And just like that, they derail the topic.

Meghan is not being stalked, someone is following some public social media accounts.

Which journalists coddled by the RF were openly racist toward her?

NormaMajors1992coat · 12/07/2025 21:20

Aaaah it is all beginning to make sense. Shall we all put the upskirting discussion behind us, and focus on payments to witnesses? It must be bad if it’s worse than being an apologist for sexual harassment 😬

BigWillyLittleTodger · 12/07/2025 21:21

Plus Kate taking all the headlines and looking fabulous to boot at Wimbledon! Is that plates I hear smashing across the Atlantic……..

Watcherfour · 12/07/2025 21:21

Serenster · 12/07/2025 21:12

Kate was a victim of surreptitious, sexually intrusive photography many many times*, and had her privacy invaded more than a hundred times by having her voicemails hacked. Her car was tracked too, and her whereabouts reported on. Appalling violations of her privacy and dignity, every single one of them. False equivalence to blur the moral lines, you say? I think we can form our own views of who is doing so here, and for what reason.

*(It’s still going on by the way. The Sussex Squad routinely post doctored photos of the upskirted photos on twitter with Kate’s underwear photoshopped out to give the impression she wasn’t wearing any. But she’s not a victim of course…)

Edited

Ok but this topic is not about Kate being a victim. Its about Natasha, Kate's personal dresser, accused by many to duplicate Meghan's looks, keeping tabs on Meghan and her private associates!

Kate and Meghan were victims from media, but do you see that in this case Natasha can be seen as a stalker here?

BigWillyLittleTodger · 12/07/2025 21:22

NormaMajors1992coat · 12/07/2025 21:20

Aaaah it is all beginning to make sense. Shall we all put the upskirting discussion behind us, and focus on payments to witnesses? It must be bad if it’s worse than being an apologist for sexual harassment 😬

Payment to witnesses! 😱

Thedom · 12/07/2025 21:24

Forget about Natasha Archer, looks like Harry and Meghan sent over their PR team to meet with Charles team. Wonder who leaked that news and where to get the photos.

www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-14899657/King-Charles-Prince-Harry-aides-meet-London-secret-peace-summit.html

Swipe left for the next trending thread