Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family
Thread gallery
23
peanutbuttertoasty · 27/06/2025 17:46

Profhilodisaster · 27/06/2025 17:45

I think the thing (amongst many other things) that has irked people is that she is using mass produced spreads , when she constantly banged on in WLM about how she made them herself. She said in one podcast how all her friends said her jam made them so happy and that's where the idea of selling them came from.

She claimed whilst debagging and repackaging pretzels from the corner shop 😂

DundeeCake58 · 27/06/2025 17:48

stressedforever · 27/06/2025 17:33

@Lundewhy so much excitement over a photo. Remember they’re just a normal family like the rest of us. Eating in Tupperware boxes is probably the norm for them.

Perhaps because at those kind of events it would be wicker picnic baskets in the back of the car/laid out on a picnic rug on the ground.

PreetyinPurple · 27/06/2025 17:52

stressedforever · 27/06/2025 17:33

@Lundewhy so much excitement over a photo. Remember they’re just a normal family like the rest of us. Eating in Tupperware boxes is probably the norm for them.

I think that was probably one of the things MM didn’t expect. She probably thought it would be endless servants doing absolutely everything.
I always remember those photos of the queens breakfast table with cereal kept in Tupperware.

DundeeCake58 · 27/06/2025 17:53

Meghan still name drops Oprah and it makes me wonder why they would still be chums if Oprah realised she’d been caught up in a web of deceit to the extent she had the interview removed and buried as deep as she could bury it.

Or perhaps Harry and Meghan asked for it to be removed and if so I wonder what reasons they gave to make her go along with them wanting to bury it (and still be their chum).

TheNinkyNonkyIsATardis · 27/06/2025 17:54

DundeeCake58 · 27/06/2025 17:53

Meghan still name drops Oprah and it makes me wonder why they would still be chums if Oprah realised she’d been caught up in a web of deceit to the extent she had the interview removed and buried as deep as she could bury it.

Or perhaps Harry and Meghan asked for it to be removed and if so I wonder what reasons they gave to make her go along with them wanting to bury it (and still be their chum).

Because most billionaires like to have it both ways.

Downplay the interview now because it disadvantages her, but leave the door open a crack for interview 2.0.

Vespanest · 27/06/2025 17:56

This is why I find this all so amusing, supporters are taste sampling both republica and Meghans tea and of course Meghans is far more superior. Night and day was the phrase. The brain cells of a gnat. Let's accuse the supplier of poor quality of goods on social media as that will do wonders for future supplies and other companies she looking to do business with.

40coats · 27/06/2025 17:58

Or perhaps stay on friendly terms in case Meghan and Harry reveal how they were arm twisted into giving the interview and how words were planted in their mouths.

Puzzledandpissedoff · 27/06/2025 18:10

Uricon2 · 27/06/2025 17:35

Bit off topic. Some years ago I was on holiday (nice N Yorks seaside town) and wandered a bit off the main drag. Tiny shop selling jewellery and accessories, very young woman running it. Took to a quirky little necklace. She said proudly "My schoolfriend makes them, they've been in Vogue!"

2 doors up, small deli, equally young lady proprietor (v early 20s at most). She apologised for the lack of stock but she'd only just opened and had more coming in tomorrow as she'd been to a trade fair in Birmingham and ordered "lots" (it was early in the season and what she had was lovely)

I departed with my necklace plus some as gifts, goodies and a sense of pride in these enterprising young "female founders" who were throwing heart and soul into their little businesses.

Apologies for the derail but the contrast with As Ever and the podcast, from someone with all the resources in the world, really struck me recently.

Don't apologise, Uricon2; these are the sort of lovely businesses I enjoy seeing (and use whenever I can in preference to the chains)

Same with coffee shops, where everyone piles into Costa, Starbucks and the like and ignores the privately run place down the road
Beats the hell out of me ...

Serenster · 27/06/2025 18:30

DundeeCake58 · 27/06/2025 17:53

Meghan still name drops Oprah and it makes me wonder why they would still be chums if Oprah realised she’d been caught up in a web of deceit to the extent she had the interview removed and buried as deep as she could bury it.

Or perhaps Harry and Meghan asked for it to be removed and if so I wonder what reasons they gave to make her go along with them wanting to bury it (and still be their chum).

I take claims that Oprah has had footage of the interview removed from the internet with a big truckload of salt.

Plenty of media companies are very protective of their content - they want you to access it through their own distribution channel (the International Olympic Committee, for example, which is zealous in removing unauthorised footage from YouTube, where they have their own account), or so you have to come to them and pay of you want access to the footage.

There are plenty of extracts on YouTube, just not the full interview. Harpo could well be making sure that the full interviews is only accessible through them - that would be sensible guardianship of their intellectual property rights.

JSMill · 27/06/2025 18:37

I believe Oprah knows the value of playing the long game. She knows a divorce is always a possibility and wants first dibs on a post divorce interview.

Mylovelygreendress · 27/06/2025 19:11

JSMill · 27/06/2025 18:37

I believe Oprah knows the value of playing the long game. She knows a divorce is always a possibility and wants first dibs on a post divorce interview.

Whilst I don’t hope they divorce , I am pretty sure that Royal lawyers will ensure that any settlement will be tied in with very strict conditions so Meghan may not be able to blab . Of course the ultimate punishment would be the removal of her title and she will fight tooth and nail to keep that!

IcedPurple · 27/06/2025 19:23

Mylovelygreendress · 27/06/2025 19:11

Whilst I don’t hope they divorce , I am pretty sure that Royal lawyers will ensure that any settlement will be tied in with very strict conditions so Meghan may not be able to blab . Of course the ultimate punishment would be the removal of her title and she will fight tooth and nail to keep that!

Meghan holds no titles in her own right. The only way to remove her titles would be to remove Harry's.

Rhaidimiddim · 27/06/2025 19:42

MrsFinkelstein · 26/06/2025 23:01

The thing I also keep in mind about that polo match @PigglyWigglyOhYeah is that Catherine had all 3 of her own children to look after, and Louis was a small toddler. Why was it her job to help Meghan out?

And even a 1st time Mum is capable of sitting down and cuddling her baby if she wants, or putting the baby in a car seat or pram for a while.

When I was out with my newborn twins I didn't expect friends to look after mine as well as their own.

It was nice when it happened but I never looked for or expected them to - especially when their hands were already full!

I've seen photos where Catherine did acknowledge M at that polo match and seemed to be inviting her to join them, with M declining.

ETA and Catherine subsequently looking totally bemused, while M stood there al9ne.

AtIusvue · 27/06/2025 19:48

Harry is in NY for some generic summit to talk about the importance of something that he gets paid sweaty cash to talk about.

Usually he plans his NY trips around a few things. Maybe he is planning to spend his mums bday in NY while big Megs launches her rose?

KateDelRick · 27/06/2025 19:50

AtIusvue · 27/06/2025 19:48

Harry is in NY for some generic summit to talk about the importance of something that he gets paid sweaty cash to talk about.

Usually he plans his NY trips around a few things. Maybe he is planning to spend his mums bday in NY while big Megs launches her rose?

Edited

NY? My goodness. I hope he's got top level armed security.

Kweenbeee · 27/06/2025 19:52

Mylovelygreendress · 27/06/2025 19:11

Whilst I don’t hope they divorce , I am pretty sure that Royal lawyers will ensure that any settlement will be tied in with very strict conditions so Meghan may not be able to blab . Of course the ultimate punishment would be the removal of her title and she will fight tooth and nail to keep that!

I dont think they need to pay her off to keep her quiet - they have the bullying scandal in their back pocket to unleash at anytime.

Depends who's got the bigger bombs I suppose - but I dont think a centuries old instituation with hundreds of strategic brains at their disposal playing the long game would bother locking horns with a D-list ex actress who is the laughing stock of the world for her delusional grandiosity and lies.

Lifestooshort71 · 27/06/2025 20:10

Is this essentially a drop shipping outfit?

or even a drip (drip) shopping outfit as the stock arrives sooooo slowly. ..

Ohpleeeease · 27/06/2025 20:19

Lifestooshort71 · 27/06/2025 20:10

Is this essentially a drop shipping outfit?

or even a drip (drip) shopping outfit as the stock arrives sooooo slowly. ..

See what you did there 😂

CathyorClaire · 27/06/2025 20:26

Didn't Oprah's arse block the view of Rachel yapping at the bookshop launch or somesuch?

Not sure she'll be top of the list for another indiscreet blockbuster.

That said I'm convinced the original in its entirety was scrubbed despite the availability of clips although I've no idea why given the many global millions who saw it and the transcript still being available.

If it's to hide her sycophantic ineptitude as an interviewer it's akin to locking the stable door after the horse has bolted 😄

peanutbuttertoasty · 27/06/2025 22:07

I certainly lost all respect for Oprah then

MaturingCheeseball · 27/06/2025 22:20

I just watched the podcast with the Emma woman - watching along with the Sidley Twins. Boy, can Meghan talk . And she is so completely conceited. It’s just extraordinary when you see her in action. She’s so pompous about “her business” which is merely licensing and is certainly not a grass-roots hard graft endeavour. She really has a brass neck.

Puzzledandpissedoff · 27/06/2025 22:20

Kweenbeee · 27/06/2025 19:52

I dont think they need to pay her off to keep her quiet - they have the bullying scandal in their back pocket to unleash at anytime.

Depends who's got the bigger bombs I suppose - but I dont think a centuries old instituation with hundreds of strategic brains at their disposal playing the long game would bother locking horns with a D-list ex actress who is the laughing stock of the world for her delusional grandiosity and lies.

Some very valid points there, Kweenbee, and yes they'd probably flick her aside like an insect

It's not as if she has any credibility left and wasn't even among the RF long, which leaves any accounts Harry may have shared with her and we all know how reliable his narratives are

As a PP said they're basically a busted flush, but it's all been by their own choice so my sympathy's limited

Profhilodisaster · 27/06/2025 22:29

MaturingCheeseball · 27/06/2025 22:20

I just watched the podcast with the Emma woman - watching along with the Sidley Twins. Boy, can Meghan talk . And she is so completely conceited. It’s just extraordinary when you see her in action. She’s so pompous about “her business” which is merely licensing and is certainly not a grass-roots hard graft endeavour. She really has a brass neck.

If you can bring yourself to really listen to her words, nearly every interview is the same , same phrases , same stupid corporate jargon, it's like a script.

TheAutumnCrow · 27/06/2025 23:23

MaturingCheeseball · 27/06/2025 22:20

I just watched the podcast with the Emma woman - watching along with the Sidley Twins. Boy, can Meghan talk . And she is so completely conceited. It’s just extraordinary when you see her in action. She’s so pompous about “her business” which is merely licensing and is certainly not a grass-roots hard graft endeavour. She really has a brass neck.

Boastful à la Sheila from The Twins At St Clare’s.

[Sorry, modern world]

BigWillyLittleTodger · 27/06/2025 23:41

I was listening to Rebecca English today who was talking about the bullying report and apparently there are people involved who should have been interviewed who were not and they don’t know why, sounds to me as though the Palace went through the motions of an investigation but that’s it, I suspect if it was released Meghan would still be protected by the Palace.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread