Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

The marching of the Kings californian grandkids

1000 replies

Thedom · 07/06/2025 08:38

Wish I could go back and find all those posters who predicted a Kardashian-esqe social media blitz at some point in H&M's future, wonder where are all the posters who we're so affronted by the very idea of that.

People magazine and all, the uber celeb magazine.

I guess needs must with the downfall of her business efforts, \oh look, here are my kids whose privacy we have decided to forego for the greater good of taking the heat off what a crap business woman I am'.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
35
Plasticcheeeandgherkins · 11/06/2025 15:57

My2cents1975 · 11/06/2025 14:11

If we do indeed agree to the reality of monarchy and the line of succession, then the rest of your post does not make sense to me.

H in an interview to Bradby said that he supported the monarchy. King Charles has a duty to the crown first and foremost and H as KC3's Duke and liege man of life and limb has a duty to support Charles.

The fact that KC3 cannot have a private conversation with the Duke of Sussex and expect it to remain private means that as King he cannot interact with this particular Duke. The fact that the Duke is violating the King's confidentiality is the root of the problem and the King has solved it by...not talking to the loudmouth, disloyal Duke.

Finally, H's feeling of what is due to him are irrelevant. H has been treated no worse than any other Spare, and in fact better than most Spares. It was not the monarchy's job to coddle H. It was H's duty when he accepted the title of Duke and in his role as a Prince of the Realm to bring glory and honour to the Realm by conducting himself in a manner befitting a Prince and not behaving like the court jester in a bad parody of royalty.

“Liege of life and limb”

“Glory and honour to the realm”

Steady on, have you overdosed on Georgette Heyer?

Plasticcheeeandgherkins · 11/06/2025 15:58

IcedPurple · 11/06/2025 15:50

I remember reading somewhere that a large part of the work of elite protection officers involves sitting at a computer, working out the best routes to locations, visiting venues and checking the entrances and exits, finding out who is likely to be present and so on. It's not like an episode of The Bodyguard. And of course the officers need time to do all this.

It's not out of spite that Harry is required to give a modest 28 days notice. It's in order to allow the experts to do their job. Which is what he wants, surely?

If it’s genuinely not out of spite then I can understand it.

But I sense a touch of revenge in the decision.

IcedPurple · 11/06/2025 16:02

Plasticcheeeandgherkins · 11/06/2025 15:58

If it’s genuinely not out of spite then I can understand it.

But I sense a touch of revenge in the decision.

Revenge?

What does RAVEC have against the unemployed 5th in line?

Are you saying that it's unreasonable for a private citizen living 8 time zones away to give advance notice of his visits? Or that highly trained, in demand specialist officers should be hanging around waiting for him to grace them with his presence? And not be able to do their job to the best of their abilities because Harry can't bother his twerking arse to make a phone call?

Because noone has yet been able to tell me just what is wrong with Harry's security arrangements. And it's not for the want of asking.

Plasticcheeeandgherkins · 11/06/2025 16:04

bluegreygreen · 11/06/2025 14:21

Thank you

It is wearing when people persist with the 'Empire 2.0' fallacy, and so insulting to the members of the Commonwealth.

That is why I referred to many of those countries. I know it doesn’t apply to all of them.

Plasticcheeeandgherkins · 11/06/2025 16:08

IcedPurple · 11/06/2025 16:02

Revenge?

What does RAVEC have against the unemployed 5th in line?

Are you saying that it's unreasonable for a private citizen living 8 time zones away to give advance notice of his visits? Or that highly trained, in demand specialist officers should be hanging around waiting for him to grace them with his presence? And not be able to do their job to the best of their abilities because Harry can't bother his twerking arse to make a phone call?

Because noone has yet been able to tell me just what is wrong with Harry's security arrangements. And it's not for the want of asking.

Edited

It’s too nice an afternoon to constantly argue but they could have made it a week’s or a few day’s notice. He isn’t an ordinary private citizen. There were palace reps sitting on the board. I think Harry said that he wasn’t allowed to put his case directly and that he had to be represented by a palace official at the hearing. If that’s the case then I don’t know how it could be entirely objective?

IcedPurple · 11/06/2025 16:13

Plasticcheeeandgherkins · 11/06/2025 16:08

It’s too nice an afternoon to constantly argue but they could have made it a week’s or a few day’s notice. He isn’t an ordinary private citizen. There were palace reps sitting on the board. I think Harry said that he wasn’t allowed to put his case directly and that he had to be represented by a palace official at the hearing. If that’s the case then I don’t know how it could be entirely objective?

It’s too nice an afternoon to constantly argue but they could have made it a week’s or a few day’s notice.

So you know better than them how much time is needed?

What qualifies you to tell highly regarded experts how to do their job? Can you be specific?

Harry is unemployed. He appears to do nothing all day long. Absolutely no reason he can't make his plans known well in advance. If not, well, he'll have to take the great risk of staying in a 5* hotel in London without armed protection.

He isn’t an ordinary private citizen.

No, which is why RAVEC have made very fair and very generous special arrangements for him. You still haven't been able to tell me quite what is wrong with those arrangements.

I think Harry said that he wasn’t allowed to put his case directly and that he had to be represented by a palace official at the hearing. If that’s the case then I don’t know how it could be entirely objective?

Your regular reminder that his Judicial Review was soundly rejected, as was his recent appeal.

But I guess that just as you know better than the security experts, you know better than 3 High Court judges too?

MaturingCheeseball · 11/06/2025 16:14

@Plasticcheeeandgherkins - do you think Harry thought he was in mortal danger wandering round Fulham pressing random doorbells?

BasiliskStare · 11/06/2025 16:18

Plasticcheeeandgherkins · 11/06/2025 15:58

If it’s genuinely not out of spite then I can understand it.

But I sense a touch of revenge in the decision.

Some of your points I can understand. But I do think the 28 day thing is not out of spite and I don't see "revenge". Here's why.

  1. Harry is getting State funded protection when he isn't a member of the WRF way beyond others who have been born to a reigning Monarch and are WRF This I think is a privilege which he ought to accept as such rather than complaining.

  2. Giving 28 days I don't think is onerous for all the checking and research and making sure Met police etc have everything lined up. & Given his father is King - his (KC's ) diary will be booked up years in advance . Bringing his (H's) wife and children over to see Grandpa will probably need a good deal of notice anyway - and summer holidays in Scotland and holidays in Sandringham will be booked out so not difficult to plan a month in advance for a family holiday with state funded security.

  3. I don't know but I imagine if there were to be a family crisis - all stops would be pulled out for Harry because the arrangement is "bespoke"

  4. He can come over any time he likes at will at no notice if he pays for whatever security himself ( not Met police / paid for by the Govt.)

I don't honestly see this as revenge or spite , & I am not trying to be argumentative - I just really don't. I have to book to see my parents in case there's a big week at the golf club or they've booked a trip to the Lake District 😂& less famous or important people I defy you to meet.

Anyway, just a view but, as I say not trying to be argumentative - just a different view perhaps to your own.

Serenster · 11/06/2025 16:19

But I guess that just as you know better than the security experts, you know better than 3 High Court judges too?

(Being a pedant here) one High Court judge, and then three Court of Appeal judges, including the Master of the Rolls, the most senior civil judge in the judiciary!

My2cents1975 · 11/06/2025 16:20

Plasticcheeeandgherkins · 11/06/2025 15:57

“Liege of life and limb”

“Glory and honour to the realm”

Steady on, have you overdosed on Georgette Heyer?

I was just highlighting the terms and conditions that H signed up to of his own free will. H was present at the coronation. He sat in the third/fourth row as Prince William took the oath on behalf of ALL members of the royal family.

The Prince kneeled before the King declaring: “I, William, Prince of Wales, pledge my loyalty to you, and faith and truth I will bear unto you, as your liege man of life and limb. So help me God.”

The oath of allegiance pledged by the heir to the King was given on behalf of all members of the Royal family. The Archbishop of Canterbury had been the first dignitary to offer allegiance, in his case on behalf of Bishops of the Church of England.

H has been in front of TV cameras several times since then, has Bryony at the Daily Mail and People on speed dial and email, and has not refuted any part of the oath. And per his Bradby interview, H is keen on this royalty and monarchy idea.

King moved by Prince William's act of loyalty

bluegreygreen · 11/06/2025 16:21

Serenster · 11/06/2025 16:19

But I guess that just as you know better than the security experts, you know better than 3 High Court judges too?

(Being a pedant here) one High Court judge, and then three Court of Appeal judges, including the Master of the Rolls, the most senior civil judge in the judiciary!

Indeed.

In fact:

'All of these issues have been examined repeatedly and meticulously by the courts, with the same conclusion reached on each occasion.'

Plasticcheeeandgherkins · 11/06/2025 16:23

smilesy · 11/06/2025 13:24

I will ask you again @Plasticcheeeandgherkins (what is “cheee” btw? 😆), how does all this concern for the Sussexes and their place within the RF align with the fact that you have stated elsewhere that you are a republican?

“plasticheee” is how my little niece used to ask for that dreadful processed stuff that goes on top of burgers 😃 her mum calls it “plastic cheese”

Yes I’d prefer it if the monarchy was slimmed down or preferably abolished. I have sympathy for Harry because he’s the underdog in this situation. Also, he is not afraid to show his true feelings, so comes across as very human, faults and all.

Serenster · 11/06/2025 16:24

Plasticcheeeandgherkins · 11/06/2025 15:57

“Liege of life and limb”

“Glory and honour to the realm”

Steady on, have you overdosed on Georgette Heyer?

As a lifelong fan of Georgette Heyer, I protest!

Anya Seton or Jean Plaidy would definitely have used those phrases. But you are doing it rather too brown if you mean to suggest that Ms Heyer would have indulged in such phrases. Not the thing, not the thing at all! 🤣

Plasticcheeeandgherkins · 11/06/2025 16:25

My2cents1975 · 11/06/2025 16:20

I was just highlighting the terms and conditions that H signed up to of his own free will. H was present at the coronation. He sat in the third/fourth row as Prince William took the oath on behalf of ALL members of the royal family.

The Prince kneeled before the King declaring: “I, William, Prince of Wales, pledge my loyalty to you, and faith and truth I will bear unto you, as your liege man of life and limb. So help me God.”

The oath of allegiance pledged by the heir to the King was given on behalf of all members of the Royal family. The Archbishop of Canterbury had been the first dignitary to offer allegiance, in his case on behalf of Bishops of the Church of England.

H has been in front of TV cameras several times since then, has Bryony at the Daily Mail and People on speed dial and email, and has not refuted any part of the oath. And per his Bradby interview, H is keen on this royalty and monarchy idea.

King moved by Prince William's act of loyalty

I see! Apologies you’ll have to forgive my ignorance about the minutiae of the oath-swearing.

My2cents1975 · 11/06/2025 16:28

BTW, Georgette Heyer does make for some light summer afternoon reading!

I wonder if we will get a new reinvention of the regency genre if KC3 decides to retire but not abdicate...regency romance in the era of social media could be an interesting take on the romance genre.

Per Microsoft Co-Pilot:
"Lady Eleanor Pingleton-Travers had never imagined that her fate would be sealed with a single notification. As the belle of London’s virtual Season, her carefully curated posts—featuring moonlit garden walks and ballgown selfies—had garnered the admiration of the ton.

Yet it was Lord Algernon Butterfields' cryptic message that set her heart aflame: “A love unspoken is a love unrealized. Meet me at midnight.” Against the backdrop of swirling rumors and strategically placed hashtags, Eleanor slipped out of her family’s grand estate, her silk skirts whispering against marble floors. The world watched through filtered glimpses, but only she knew that behind the screens, a romance was brewing more passionate than any viral spectacle."

Plasticcheeeandgherkins · 11/06/2025 16:29

Serenster · 11/06/2025 16:24

As a lifelong fan of Georgette Heyer, I protest!

Anya Seton or Jean Plaidy would definitely have used those phrases. But you are doing it rather too brown if you mean to suggest that Ms Heyer would have indulged in such phrases. Not the thing, not the thing at all! 🤣

Yes, you are quite right Serenster my mistake! 😆

I confess to having enjoyed the odd Georgette Heyer way back when 😀

OctopusFriend · 11/06/2025 16:31

Plasticcheeeandgherkins · 11/06/2025 16:23

“plasticheee” is how my little niece used to ask for that dreadful processed stuff that goes on top of burgers 😃 her mum calls it “plastic cheese”

Yes I’d prefer it if the monarchy was slimmed down or preferably abolished. I have sympathy for Harry because he’s the underdog in this situation. Also, he is not afraid to show his true feelings, so comes across as very human, faults and all.

He's certainly not an underdog! So wealthy and privileged!
Also, it's not ok to "show your feelings" if you're doing it to harm others and make money from it.

JSMill · 11/06/2025 16:47

MaturingCheeseball · 11/06/2025 16:14

@Plasticcheeeandgherkins - do you think Harry thought he was in mortal danger wandering round Fulham pressing random doorbells?

Didn’t he realise someone might go to the media with their ringgo camera footage? Actually he probably has no idea about such things.

Nagginthenag · 11/06/2025 17:43

Plasticcheeeandgherkins · 11/06/2025 15:58

If it’s genuinely not out of spite then I can understand it.

But I sense a touch of revenge in the decision.

So do you think RAVEC are being spiteful to the Princess Royal? To Edward and Sophie? What with them only having security when they're undertaking royal duties which have been planned previously?

AskingQuestionsAllTheTime · 11/06/2025 17:46

If the Heyer accuracy is indicative of the rest, I think we can safely ignore anything further from the source in question.

Perhaps rather than allowing a perpetual derail into whether or not it is OK for Harry Mountbatten-Windsor to swan around expecting unprecedented and undeserved special treatment, we ought to go back to whether the unfortunate Markle progeny are liable to be merched at any moment.

OctopusFriend · 11/06/2025 17:46

JSMill · 11/06/2025 16:47

Didn’t he realise someone might go to the media with their ringgo camera footage? Actually he probably has no idea about such things.

No, because he's so used to it being him going to the media, and selling stories about others.
Boot, other foot.

BustingBaoBun · 11/06/2025 18:06

AtIusvue · 11/06/2025 09:29

She went for photo op to keep her name in the press because her show was delayed. Get real.

A anonymous donation of £££££££s would have been better appreciated. But that doesn’t get your face in the press does it?

How strange.

Time and time again I have heard Meghan and Harry detractors on here say unequivocally, stop advertising what you donate to.

How do you categorically know they didn't donate anonymously?

smilesy · 11/06/2025 18:18

Plasticcheeeandgherkins · 11/06/2025 16:23

“plasticheee” is how my little niece used to ask for that dreadful processed stuff that goes on top of burgers 😃 her mum calls it “plastic cheese”

Yes I’d prefer it if the monarchy was slimmed down or preferably abolished. I have sympathy for Harry because he’s the underdog in this situation. Also, he is not afraid to show his true feelings, so comes across as very human, faults and all.

Ah. Thanks for the explanation of the name 😆

”Slimming down the monarchy” is not the same as republicanism though, is it? And you do seem to be in favour of more money being spent on Harry’s security 🤷‍♀️

Special protection also look after politicians, not just the Royals, so 28 days notice would seem eminently reasonable to allow for rosters to be adjusted as well as appropriate arrangements to be made if Harry wants to visit

typo and meant to add that I’m not sure Harry seems more human for showing his emotions when they mostly consist of “waaagh” 😆

AtIusvue · 11/06/2025 18:29

BustingBaoBun · 11/06/2025 18:06

How strange.

Time and time again I have heard Meghan and Harry detractors on here say unequivocally, stop advertising what you donate to.

How do you categorically know they didn't donate anonymously?

Because they need to announce everything they do, it’s in their nature. There’s another thread right now about the good work Harry has done donating to a UK charity. Wonder how that info got out??? They don’t do anything unless it’s good PR.

Uricon2 · 11/06/2025 18:48

Plasticcheeeandgherkins · 11/06/2025 16:23

“plasticheee” is how my little niece used to ask for that dreadful processed stuff that goes on top of burgers 😃 her mum calls it “plastic cheese”

Yes I’d prefer it if the monarchy was slimmed down or preferably abolished. I have sympathy for Harry because he’s the underdog in this situation. Also, he is not afraid to show his true feelings, so comes across as very human, faults and all.

I imagine the poor stable lass who he apparently lost his virginity too (the "older woman" who was also a teenager) and the benighted school matron he ridiculed would have been quite happy if fewer of his "true feelings" had been made public, to make him money.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread