Harry and RAVEC #2

[Baital]

To continue...

He’s unbearably entitled and seems to have a very tenuous grip on reality. There’s certainly no awareness that what he has done to his family has caused them significant pain and heartache. He’s like some of the kids I used to teach in secondary schools - they would throw a chair at your head/thump you/push you over and then be outraged and upset that they were in real and proper trouble. ‘I know I broke your hand, but I said sorry and you started it by asking me to put my tie on!’ It’s like there is a bit missing in the brain that makes the link between actions and consequences.

I am minded to write a sternly worded letter to the BBC - it won't do any good but it might make me feel better 😂If only I lived in Tunbridge Wells it might carry more weight.

Harry has a habit of using generalised language to hide what he is really saying so he has the ability to deny. Very much like the racism claims that actually weren't when questioned. He has basically said the late Queen and Charles have acted unconstitutional by using influence over a government body but again he uses the royal family so anybody who questions with a direct name gets the response of I didn't say that it's the media twisting things. By this point as Charles and Catherine are proof of social media have already attacked. His words have caused the damage he craves.

The Daily Mail; now provided with "information" by the Sussexes, as relayed by their friend Bryony Gordon. It's all true!!

A crash pad where BBC stafffers stay while away perhaps?

Honestly @IcedPurple, I’m not sure I would be able to ask questions without asking the idiot if he was either..
A irretrievably stupid
B drunk
C so mentally damaged by his prolonged and prolific drug use.

I doubt any proper journalist would get any decent answers, he’s simply too stupid to understand the questions.

...or A, B and C.

Probably @PoppysAunt!! 🤣

Seriously, where are Sky and BBC getting their 'royal experts' from?

Do they know that Harry does get security when he visits Britain? They don't appear to.

He has private armed security in other 'unsafe' countries.

Best he stay in unsafe countries then.

Poor William. And here I was thinking my brother was an annoying twat

I presume who gets IPP status has been set via some international agreement. And I imagine it is drawn pretty narrowly. It places obligations on other governments and those countries would not be prepared to incur the cost for another country’s celebrities or distant royals.

🤷‍♀️ the unemployment office?
anyway I need to step away for now , I’m finding myself to angry to post anything worthwhile that doesn’t include long strings of swearing 🤬

I'd love to interview him 😁
Me: Harry, what day is it?
Harry: It's my family's fault, also the press, RAVEC, the Phantom of the Opera and dog bowl manufacturers.

Seriously, where are Sky and BBC getting their 'royal experts' from?

The snug bar down at the Dog and Duck?

The interviewer is based in New York. They will have sent her as the nearest to California. Such a missed opportunity, BBC.

I never understood why she came out the front door of the hotel into the throng of photographers. All these top hotels have underground parking with back exit, its how private celebrities and trades people get in and out without being seen.

While simultaneously saying in the same short interview that the experts were wrong and his father hadn't intervened like he should have done ...

All unchallenged by the useless BBC.

From Sky News
Buckingham Palace statement on outcome of Harry security case
We can bring you reaction from Buckingham Palace now, after the Court of Appeal decision on Prince Harry's UK security arrangements today.
Buckingham Palace said in a statement: "All of these issues have been examined repeatedly and meticulously by the courts, with the same conclusion reached on each occasion."
It's understood that the King felt it would have been constitutionally improper to intervene while the case was being considered by the government and reviewed by the courts.
It comes after Harry said in his BBC interview earlier: "I have had it described to me, once people knew about the facts, that this is a good old-fashioned establishment stitch-up, and that is what it feels like."

The BBC et al need to be thinking long term here. W&C are already taking more control of their own media - photos and videos released first on their own channels, rather than going to the BBC etc. Piss them off too much you might find in future the King's Christmas message and other significant events are being handled 'in house' rather than via BBC, ITV, Sky etc.

And then the Judge explained that they felt Sir Richard had very good reason to do so in Harry's specific case.

The Palace obv thought they needed to get a statement out sharpish before everyone started their long weekends.

He could save a lot flying first class instead of private jet.

Harry is clearly upset and angry, he has not moved on and if anything wants some parts of his life back that he gave up and blew up. There is no way he goes home and shuts all this off. I can't believe for a second he is in some sort of honeymoon period. I don't have much sympathy but he is broken and the one thing I do agree with him and his ghostwriter is that he sees his emotional truth as important as objective facts but this is not a good quality. He must be a nightmare to live with